本文選題：區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì) + 指標(biāo)體系　； 參考：《河南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化，區(qū)域一體化的浪潮迭起，在這經(jīng)濟(jì)迅速發(fā)展的形勢(shì)下怎樣應(yīng)對(duì)區(qū)域問(wèn)題并對(duì)應(yīng)解決，這是一個(gè)非常重要又熱門(mén)的課題。中國(guó)既為最大的發(fā)展中國(guó)家，又為最大的社會(huì)主義國(guó)家，它的區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)一直面臨著巨大的機(jī)遇，更面臨著前所未有的挑戰(zhàn)。結(jié)合新的歷史背景，敢于正視并認(rèn)真研究中國(guó)在新時(shí)期的區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展問(wèn)題，為協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展，優(yōu)化中國(guó)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)，區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式轉(zhuǎn)變具有十分重要的理論意義和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者關(guān)于中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展差距的研究主要有對(duì)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)差距的現(xiàn)狀考察和差異產(chǎn)生的原因分析,也有通過(guò)分析區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)差異的過(guò)去表現(xiàn)來(lái)預(yù)測(cè)未來(lái)差異的走向。由于研究對(duì)象不同、分析的期間不同、選擇的指標(biāo)不同和研究的方法不同,現(xiàn)有的研究沒(méi)有形成一致的研究結(jié)論。區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)的相關(guān)理論主要以區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)非均衡、區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)與差異兩個(gè)方面為基礎(chǔ)。 本文進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析需要的指標(biāo)都遵循科學(xué)客觀性、全面重要性、層次性、易得性、動(dòng)態(tài)可比性等五大原則，本文采用最傳統(tǒng)的以省級(jí)行政單位的分法進(jìn)行研究，根據(jù)本文研究需要，選擇17個(gè)統(tǒng)計(jì)指標(biāo)，各指標(biāo)或發(fā)展的各個(gè)環(huán)節(jié)也是不一致的，區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展是一個(gè)綜合的范疇，單一指標(biāo)不能反映全部，所以必須計(jì)算出一個(gè)綜合指數(shù)，這樣才能對(duì)區(qū)域市區(qū)總體發(fā)展水平有個(gè)判斷和排序。并對(duì)GDP、居民收入、居民儲(chǔ)蓄存款余額、進(jìn)出口總值、地方公共財(cái)政預(yù)算收入、社會(huì)消費(fèi)品零售總額、全社會(huì)固定資產(chǎn)投資、城鎮(zhèn)化率等指標(biāo)進(jìn)行了一定的解釋?zhuān)倔w系采取常用的專(zhuān)家評(píng)定法（Delphi法）和因子分析結(jié)合來(lái)確定指標(biāo)的權(quán)重。 中國(guó)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)證研究主要分為三個(gè)部分。首先選用代表經(jīng)濟(jì)綜合實(shí)力的七個(gè)指標(biāo)，，它們分別是GDP、居民總收入、居民儲(chǔ)蓄存款余額、進(jìn)出口總額、財(cái)政一般預(yù)算收入、社會(huì)消費(fèi)品零售總額、全社會(huì)固定資產(chǎn)投資，綜合分析單項(xiàng)指標(biāo)的重要程度，采取專(zhuān)家投票方法，確定這七個(gè)指標(biāo)的權(quán)重，建立區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)綜合實(shí)力指標(biāo)體系，以2000年為基期，對(duì)比研究全國(guó)31個(gè)省市區(qū)2000年、2005年、2010年、2012年的區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)綜合實(shí)力發(fā)展指數(shù)及排名。然后選用代表經(jīng)濟(jì)綜合發(fā)展水平的十個(gè)指標(biāo)，它們分別是人均GDP、人均居民收入、人均居民儲(chǔ)蓄存款余額、人均進(jìn)出口總額、人均財(cái)政一般預(yù)算收入、人均社會(huì)消費(fèi)品零售總額、人均全社會(huì)固定資產(chǎn)投資、第三產(chǎn)業(yè)占GDP比重、居民收入占GDP比重、城鎮(zhèn)化率，綜合分析單項(xiàng)指標(biāo)的重要程度，采取專(zhuān)家投票方法，確定這十個(gè)指標(biāo)的權(quán)重，建立區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平指標(biāo)體系，以2000年為基期，實(shí)證研究全國(guó)31個(gè)省市區(qū)2000年、2005年、2010年、2012年的綜合發(fā)展指數(shù)及排名。最后結(jié)合對(duì)比2012年中國(guó)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平的因子分析，共同得出中國(guó)區(qū)域之間的經(jīng)濟(jì)綜合實(shí)力與發(fā)展水平在不斷地提高的同時(shí)也是不均衡的，而且這種不均衡仍在持續(xù)。 造成我國(guó)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展不均衡的原因是復(fù)雜的，系統(tǒng)來(lái)看，導(dǎo)致這種不均衡發(fā)展的態(tài)勢(shì)是由自然稟賦、歷史政策、經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)、資本技術(shù)、人口、對(duì)外開(kāi)放等多種因素綜合作用的結(jié)果，然后根據(jù)這些影響因素提出了相關(guān)的政策建議，主要有完善基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)、系統(tǒng)區(qū)域政策體系，深化經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革、繼續(xù)優(yōu)化產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)，持續(xù)加大教育科研投資、健全人才保障體系，助推城鄉(xiāng)經(jīng)濟(jì)良性互動(dòng)，擴(kuò)大對(duì)外開(kāi)放區(qū)域。
[Abstract]:With the economic globalization and the wave of regional integration, it is a very important and hot topic how to deal with the regional problems and solve them in the situation of rapid economic development. China is the largest developing country and the largest socialist country. Its regional economy has been faced with great opportunities and more face to face. Facing the unprecedented challenge, combining with the new historical background, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to face and seriously study the problems of regional economic development in China in the new period. It is of great theoretical and practical significance for the coordinated development, the optimization of China's regional economic structure and the transformation of regional economic growth mode.
The domestic and foreign scholars' research on the gap between China's economic development mainly includes the analysis of the current situation of regional economic gap and the cause analysis of the difference, and the trend of predicting the future difference through the analysis of the past performance of regional economic differences. The existing research has not formed a consistent research conclusion. The related theories of regional economy are mainly based on two aspects of regional economic disequilibrium, regional economic growth and differences.
In this paper, the indicators need to follow the five principles of scientific objectivity, overall importance, level, availability, dynamic comparability, and so on. This paper uses the most traditional division of administrative units at the provincial level to study. According to the needs of this paper, 17 statistical indicators are selected, and the various links of each index or development are also inconsistent, Regional economic development is a comprehensive category, the single index can not reflect the whole, so we must calculate a comprehensive index, so that the overall development level of regional urban areas can be judged and ordered. And GDP, resident income, resident savings balance, total value of import and export, local public finance budget income, social consumer goods retail. The total social fixed assets investment, the urbanization rate and other indicators have been explained. The system adopts the common expert evaluation method (Delphi method) and factor analysis to determine the weight of the index.
The empirical study of China's regional economy is divided into three parts. First, we choose seven indexes representing the comprehensive strength of the economy. They are GDP, the total income of the residents, the balance of the savings deposits, the total import and export, the general budget income, the total retail sales of social consumer goods, the investment in the fixed assets of the whole society, and the comprehensive analysis of the single index. Degree, adopt expert voting method, determine the weight of these seven indexes, establish the index system of regional economic comprehensive strength, take 2000 as the base period, compare and study the regional economic comprehensive strength development index and ranking of the 31 provinces and municipalities in 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2012, and choose the ten indexes representing the comprehensive economic development level. They are per capita GDP, per capita income, per capita household savings balance, per capita total import and export, per capita gross financial budget income, per capita retail sales of social consumer goods, per capita social fixed assets investment, the proportion of the third industry in the proportion of GDP, the income of residents in the GDP ratio, the urbanization rate, the importance of the comprehensive analysis of single index, and the importance of the comprehensive analysis of the single index. Take the method of expert voting to determine the weight of the ten indexes and establish the index system of regional economic development level. Taking 2000 as the base period, the comprehensive development index and ranking of the 31 provinces and municipalities in 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2012 are empirically studied. Finally, the factor analysis on the development level of regional economic development in China in 2012 is used to draw China together. The comprehensive economic strength and development level between regions are uneven and uneven.
The cause of the unbalanced development of China's regional economic development is complicated. In a systematic view, the situation of this unbalanced development is the result of a combination of natural endowment, historical policy, economic structure, capital technology, population and opening to the outside world. Then, the relevant policy suggestions are put forward according to these factors, which are mainly finished. The construction of good infrastructure, the system of regional policy, the deepening of the reform of the economic system, the continuous optimization of the industrial structure, the continuous increase of investment in education and scientific research, the improvement of the system of personnel protection, the positive interaction between the urban and rural economy and the expansion of the open area.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F127

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 羅仁福,李小建,覃成林;中國(guó)省際經(jīng)濟(jì)趨同的定量分析[J];地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2002年01期

2 洪國(guó)志;胡華穎;李郇;;中國(guó)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展收斂的空間計(jì)量分析[J];地理學(xué)報(bào);2010年12期

3 范劍勇,朱國(guó)林;中國(guó)地區(qū)差距演變及其結(jié)構(gòu)分解[J];管理世界;2002年07期

4 戈銀慶;中國(guó)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題研究綜述[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年01期

5 范劍勇;;產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)失衡、空間集聚與中國(guó)地區(qū)差距變化[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年02期

6 宋德勇,李忠華;中國(guó)省級(jí)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的差異分析[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年06期

7 魏后凱;我國(guó)地區(qū)發(fā)展差距的形成、影響及其協(xié)調(diào)途徑[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究參考;1997年14期

8 李會(huì)寧;葉民強(qiáng);;我國(guó)東中西部三地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展差距分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題探索;2006年02期

9 周毅;李京文;;區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展理論演化及其啟示[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家;2012年03期

10 蔡f ,都陽(yáng);中國(guó)地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的趨同與差異——對(duì)西部開(kāi)發(fā)戰(zhàn)略的啟示[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2000年10期

本文編號(hào)：1854806