環(huán)境規(guī)制對(duì)區(qū)域技術(shù)效率的影響研究
本文關(guān)鍵詞: 環(huán)境規(guī)制 環(huán)境容量 技術(shù)效率 RD 出處:《重慶師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文 論文類(lèi)型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】:環(huán)境問(wèn)題一直是我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展中的焦點(diǎn)和熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題,針對(duì)存在的環(huán)境問(wèn)題,國(guó)家提出環(huán)境規(guī)制政策。但環(huán)境規(guī)制政策是否在保護(hù)環(huán)境的同時(shí)促進(jìn)區(qū)域技術(shù)效率卻是目前一個(gè)爭(zhēng)論不休的熱點(diǎn)話(huà)題。本文在充分梳理國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,,引入環(huán)境容量這一指標(biāo),并充分考慮我國(guó)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展不平衡這一現(xiàn)狀,先把我國(guó)30個(gè)省份進(jìn)行統(tǒng)一分析,在此基礎(chǔ)上再對(duì)東、西部進(jìn)行分開(kāi)研究,在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)比分析環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度對(duì)我國(guó)地區(qū)技術(shù)效率是否有著顯著性影響。 本文利用DEA工具基于C2R模型采用我國(guó)30個(gè)省份2006年至2010年的面板數(shù)據(jù)對(duì)區(qū)域技術(shù)效率進(jìn)行分析。在大量閱讀國(guó)內(nèi)外參考文獻(xiàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,本文選定“RD經(jīng)費(fèi)投入”和“RD人員投入”作為技術(shù)效率投入指標(biāo),選定“國(guó)內(nèi)三種專(zhuān)利申請(qǐng)授理數(shù)”作為技術(shù)效率產(chǎn)出指標(biāo)來(lái)分析區(qū)域技術(shù)效率。本文實(shí)證分析表明,在技術(shù)效率這一方面,東部地區(qū)的技術(shù)效率確實(shí)是比西部地區(qū)要高一些。但是,西部追趕之勢(shì)強(qiáng)大,二者之間的差距在逐步縮小,截止到2011年已相差不大。 在此基礎(chǔ)上,把“區(qū)域技術(shù)效率”作為被解釋變量,把代表環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度的“工業(yè)廢水排放較少量”,“二氧化硫排放減少量”,“污染治理投資所占GDP的比例”和環(huán)境容量中的代表之一“水環(huán)境容量”,“環(huán)境污染、破壞事件(突然事件)的次數(shù)”及“地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)!弊鳛榻忉屪兞浚选癛D經(jīng)費(fèi)投入”和“RD人員投入”作為控制變量進(jìn)行計(jì)量回歸分析;貧w分析表明,環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度對(duì)我國(guó)區(qū)域技術(shù)效率的影響是顯著的,而環(huán)境容量對(duì)我國(guó)區(qū)域技術(shù)效率卻沒(méi)有顯著的影響。 因?yàn)槲覈?guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展情況存在著很大的地區(qū)差異性,鑒于此,本文把我國(guó)東西兩部分開(kāi)研究,在此基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)比分析。實(shí)證分析結(jié)果表明,就我們東部地區(qū)而言,環(huán)境規(guī)制對(duì)其地區(qū)技術(shù)效率的影響是顯著的,但對(duì)我們西部地區(qū)而言,則影響不大。而環(huán)境容量對(duì)我國(guó)西部地區(qū)的技術(shù)進(jìn)步率有著顯著的影響,而對(duì)我國(guó)東部地區(qū)則影響不顯著。
[Abstract]:Environmental problems have always been the focus and hot issues in China's economic development, aiming at the existing environmental problems. The national environmental regulation policy is put forward, but whether the environmental regulation policy promotes the regional technical efficiency while protecting the environment is a hot topic at present. . Introducing the index of environmental capacity and taking into account the imbalance of regional economic development in China, the 30 provinces of our country are analyzed in a unified way, and then the east and west are studied separately. On the basis of this, the paper contrasts and analyzes whether the environmental regulation intensity has significant influence on the regional technical efficiency of our country. Based on the C2R model, this paper analyzes the regional technical efficiency by using the panel data from 2006 to 2010 in 30 provinces of China using DEA tools. Based on a large number of references at home and abroad, this paper analyzes the efficiency of regional technology. . This paper chooses "R D funds input" and "R D personnel input" as the technical efficiency input index. Selected "three kinds of patent application grant number" as the technical efficiency output index to analyze the regional technical efficiency. The empirical analysis shows that the technical efficiency in this respect. The technical efficiency of the eastern region is indeed higher than that of the western region, but the western catch-up trend is strong, and the gap between the two regions is gradually narrowing, and by 2011 there was no difference. On this basis, "regional technical efficiency" is taken as the explanatory variable, "industrial wastewater discharge is small" and "sulfur dioxide emission is reduced", which represents the intensity of environmental regulation. "proportion of pollution control investment in GDP" and "water environmental capacity", "environmental pollution", one of the representatives of environmental capacity. "the number of destructive events (sudden events)" and "regional economic scale" as explanatory variables, "R D expenditure" and "R D personnel input" as control variables were used as econometric regression analysis. Regression analysis showed that. The influence of environmental regulation intensity on the regional technical efficiency is significant, but the environmental capacity has no significant effect on the regional technical efficiency of our country. Because there is a great regional difference in the economic development of our country, in view of this, this paper studies the east and west parts of our country, on the basis of which, the comparative analysis. The empirical analysis results show that. As far as our eastern region is concerned, the impact of environmental regulation on its regional technical efficiency is significant, but for our western region. The environmental capacity has a significant effect on the rate of technological progress in the western part of China, but not on the eastern part of China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:重慶師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:F124.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 趙紅;;環(huán)境規(guī)制對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的影響——基于中國(guó)面板數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證分析[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年03期
2 白雪潔;宋瑩;;環(huán)境規(guī)制、技術(shù)創(chuàng)新與中國(guó)火電行業(yè)的效率提升[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年08期
3 張成;于同申;郭路;;環(huán)境規(guī)制影響了中國(guó)工業(yè)的生產(chǎn)率嗎——基于DEA與協(xié)整分析的實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)理論與經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2010年03期
4 吳清;;環(huán)境規(guī)制與企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新研究——基于我國(guó)30個(gè)省份數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證研究[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2011年18期
5 王國(guó)印;王動(dòng);;環(huán)境規(guī)制與企業(yè)科技創(chuàng)新——低碳視角下波特假說(shuō)在東部地區(qū)的檢驗(yàn)性研究[J];科技與經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年05期
6 趙細(xì)康,李建民,王金營(yíng),周春旗;環(huán)境庫(kù)茲涅茨曲線(xiàn)及在中國(guó)的檢驗(yàn)[J];南開(kāi)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2005年03期
本文編號(hào):1487572
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/shijiejingjilunwen/1487572.html