Community is the basic unit of society and the "last link" of implementing national policies and measures,providing public services and realizing social reform.As an important basis for national and social governance,the effectiveness and level of community governance bear on social harmony and stability and long-term stability of the country,as well as the smooth realization of comprehensively deepening the overall goal of reform and advancing the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity.In strengthening and innovating social governance,the 19 th CPC report proposes to establish a social governance pattern of co-construction and co-governance,and points out that the reform of community governance should be advanced,the focus of social governance should be gradually shifted from the upper level to the lower level,and the power of social organizations should be utilized to promote positive interaction between the government and residents.The construction of rural communities in Dongsheng district started late and is still in the stage of exploration and development.while the achievements in rural community governance are being made,there are still some problems that restrict the development of rural communities.Based on the current situation of rural community development in Dongsheng district and through field investigation and analysis,this paper is intended to summarize the problems existing in rural community governance in Dongsheng district.Among which the more prominent problems are the single governance of rural communities,the low participation of residents,the lack of multi-subject participation,and the overall quality of community work team.with the aid of good governance theory,multi-center governance theory,combining the characteristics of dongsheng district of rural community,put forward some advance dongsheng district of the opinions and Suggestions of rural community governance,First,the government plays the role of guiding and supporting;Second,foster the consciousness of the main body of the residents and improve the enthusiasm of the community residents;Third,to stimulate the vitality of social organizations and give play to the role of multiple subjects;Fourth,strengthen the construction of community talent,to stimulate work vitality.It is hoped that this paper can provide references for further improvement of rural community governance in dongsheng district.
【學(xué)位單位】：內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位年份】：2018
【中圖分類】：D422.6
【文章目錄】：
abstract
引言
    （一）研究的背景和意義
    （二）國內(nèi)外研究概況和發(fā)展趨勢
        1.國外研究綜述
        2.國內(nèi)研究綜述
    （三）論文的研究內(nèi)容與研究方法
        1.研究思路
        2.研究方法
一、相關(guān)概念及理論基礎(chǔ)
    （一）相關(guān)概念
        1.社區(qū)與農(nóng)村社區(qū)
        2.治理
        3.社區(qū)治理與農(nóng)村社區(qū)治理
    （二）基礎(chǔ)理論
        1.善治理論
        2.多中心治理理論
二、東勝區(qū)農(nóng)村社區(qū)治理狀況
    （一）東勝區(qū)農(nóng)村社區(qū)基本情況
        1.社區(qū)陣地建設(shè)不同
        2.社區(qū)基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)不同
        3.社區(qū)居民的人員構(gòu)成不同
        4.社區(qū)工作方式不同
    （二）東勝區(qū)農(nóng)村社區(qū)治理現(xiàn)狀
        1.東勝區(qū)農(nóng)村社區(qū)的組織架構(gòu)
        2.東勝區(qū)農(nóng)村社區(qū)治理的治理主體
        3.東勝區(qū)農(nóng)村社區(qū)治理的方式
        4.東勝區(qū)社區(qū)治理工作機(jī)制
三、東勝區(qū)農(nóng)村社區(qū)治理存在的問題及原因分析
    （一）社區(qū)治理方式單一,公共服務(wù)投入不足
    （二）居民主體意識淡薄,參與度不高
    （三）社會(huì)組織發(fā)展不足,缺乏多元主體的參與
    （四）社區(qū)人才隊(duì)伍缺乏,整體素質(zhì)偏低
四、推進(jìn)東勝區(qū)農(nóng)村社區(qū)治理的對策建議
    （一）政府發(fā)揮引導(dǎo)和支持的作用
    （二）培養(yǎng)居民主體意識,提高社區(qū)居民積極性
    （三）激發(fā)社會(huì)組織活力,發(fā)揮多元主體的作用
    （四）加強(qiáng)社區(qū)人才建設(shè),激發(fā)工作活力
結(jié)束語
參考文獻(xiàn)
附錄
致謝

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡文秀;李壯;;治理理論視角下我國農(nóng)村社區(qū)管理體制創(chuàng)新研究[J];福建行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年03期

2 李潤國;姜慶志;李國鋒;;治理現(xiàn)代化視野下的農(nóng)村社區(qū)治理創(chuàng)新研究[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年06期

3 楊亮承;魯可榮;;城市化進(jìn)程中城郊型農(nóng)村社區(qū)治理困境與策略選擇[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年05期

4 孫迪亮;;農(nóng)村社區(qū)社會(huì)組織參與提供社區(qū)公共服務(wù)的理據(jù)與價(jià)值[J];天津行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年03期

5 項(xiàng)繼權(quán);王明為;;農(nóng)村社區(qū)建設(shè):發(fā)展態(tài)勢與階段特征[J];青海社會(huì)科學(xué);2015年02期

6 羅菲;謝恒峰;;新型農(nóng)村社區(qū)治理:理念、路徑與對策——基于襄陽紅水家園的實(shí)證調(diào)查[J];市場周刊(理論研究);2015年02期

7 王名;蔡志鴻;王春婷;;社會(huì)共治:多元主體共同治理的實(shí)踐探索與制度創(chuàng)新[J];中國行政管理;2014年12期

8 常安;陳偉航;;新型農(nóng)村社區(qū)建設(shè)中的農(nóng)民主體性彰顯問題研究[J];中州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年02期

9 姚中進(jìn);;非政府組織在社區(qū)治理中的地位和作用[J];學(xué)習(xí)月刊;2013年24期

10 門獻(xiàn)敏;;社會(huì)管理創(chuàng)新視野下我國農(nóng)村社會(huì)組織的角色定位[J];社會(huì)主義研究;2012年02期

本文編號：2888835