【摘要】：摘要：從全球范圍內(nèi)來看,由都市群構(gòu)成的經(jīng)濟(jì)圈已成為世界經(jīng)濟(jì)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的主角,它們的發(fā)展對(duì)一定區(qū)域乃至一國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展起著不可替代的作用。在我國(guó)以首都為中心的經(jīng)濟(jì)圈內(nèi),生產(chǎn)要素分布不均衡,產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)不盡合理,二元經(jīng)濟(jì)現(xiàn)象突出,產(chǎn)業(yè)梯度比較大,區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展極不平衡。在北京的城市功能定位和產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級(jí)影響下,其工業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)必然向外轉(zhuǎn)移,而作為首都經(jīng)濟(jì)圈區(qū)域內(nèi)具有工業(yè)和資源優(yōu)勢(shì)的天津和河北來說,合理承接北京移出的工業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè),不僅將對(duì)其經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展具有推動(dòng)作用,而且對(duì)首都經(jīng)濟(jì)圈區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化和整體經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展都將是十分重要的。但目前首都經(jīng)濟(jì)圈產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的涉及范圍不夠廣泛,產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移層次也不高,主要還是因?yàn)閰^(qū)域整體缺乏協(xié)作機(jī)制與合作機(jī)制,政府沒有根據(jù)市場(chǎng)條件適時(shí)引導(dǎo)。 本文以京津冀作為首都經(jīng)濟(jì)圈產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的研究對(duì)象,綜合運(yùn)用實(shí)證分析、比較分析、規(guī)范分析相結(jié)合的研究方法,論述首都經(jīng)濟(jì)圈產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移機(jī)理、轉(zhuǎn)移行業(yè)選擇及產(chǎn)業(yè)優(yōu)化布局。 在系統(tǒng)梳理產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移理論和區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展理論的基礎(chǔ)上,以首都經(jīng)濟(jì)圈經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移問題著手,分析問題存在的原因,進(jìn)一步闡述首都經(jīng)濟(jì)圈產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移機(jī)理,包括市場(chǎng)驅(qū)動(dòng)和政府調(diào)控兩方面,并將生產(chǎn)要素稟賦差異和產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)差異作為市場(chǎng)驅(qū)動(dòng)的主要因素,部分產(chǎn)業(yè)應(yīng)從北京轉(zhuǎn)移至河北和天津,同時(shí)天津又可將部分產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移至相對(duì)落后的河北。本文對(duì)比分析了京津冀三地工業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)梯度,指出該地區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)錯(cuò)位發(fā)展途徑,即北京應(yīng)發(fā)展高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)和生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè),天津應(yīng)發(fā)展石油能源和設(shè)備制造業(yè),而河北則發(fā)展現(xiàn)代工業(yè)和現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè),從而得出該地區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)的合理布局。為保證產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的順利實(shí)施,首都經(jīng)濟(jì)圈整體應(yīng)統(tǒng)籌規(guī)劃、協(xié)同發(fā)展,產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移方應(yīng)積極發(fā)揮引擎作用,而產(chǎn)業(yè)承接方則應(yīng)重點(diǎn)提升自身水平。 論文的創(chuàng)新在于尊重市場(chǎng)導(dǎo)向在前,政府引導(dǎo)在后的規(guī)律,整體把握首都經(jīng)濟(jì)圈的發(fā)展,重視經(jīng)濟(jì)圈核心城市的輻射作用,而不在乎經(jīng)濟(jì)圈的范圍和邊界。在進(jìn)行產(chǎn)業(yè)梯度分析時(shí),對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)出地增加了動(dòng)態(tài)產(chǎn)業(yè)變化分析,即構(gòu)建比較行業(yè)增長(zhǎng)率,綜合判斷具有產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移趨勢(shì)的行業(yè)。論文包括圖7幅,表17個(gè),參考文獻(xiàn)41篇。
[Abstract]:Abstract: from a global perspective, the economic circle composed of urban clusters has become the main role of the world economic competition, and their development plays an irreplaceable role in the economic development of a certain region or even a country. In the economic circle with the capital as the center, the distribution of factors of production is not balanced, the industrial structure is unreasonable, the phenomenon of dual economy is prominent, the industrial gradient is relatively large, and the development of regional economy is extremely unbalanced. Under the influence of Beijing's urban function orientation and industrial structure upgrading, the industrial industry of Beijing must be transferred outwards. Tianjin and Hebei, which have the advantages of industry and resources in the region of the capital economic circle, should reasonably undertake the industrial industries moved out of Beijing. It will not only promote its economic development, but also play an important role in the optimization of regional industrial structure and the overall economic development of the Capital Economic Circle. But at present, the scope of industrial transfer in the capital economic circle is not wide enough, and the level of industrial transfer is not high, mainly because of the lack of coordination mechanism and cooperation mechanism in the region as a whole, and the government does not guide in time according to the market conditions. This paper takes Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei as the research object of the industrial transfer of the capital economic circle, and discusses the mechanism of the industrial transfer of the capital economic circle by means of empirical analysis, comparative analysis and normative analysis. Transfer industry selection and industry optimization layout. On the basis of systematically combing the theory of industrial transfer and the theory of regional economic development, starting with the problems of economic development and industrial transfer in the capital economic circle, this paper analyzes the causes of the problems, and further expounds the mechanism of industrial transfer in the capital economic circle. Including market drive and government regulation and control, and taking the difference of factor endowment and industrial structure as the main factors of market driving, some industries should be transferred from Beijing to Hebei and Tianjin. At the same time, Tianjin can transfer some industries to relatively backward Hebei. This paper compares and analyzes the industrial gradients in the three places of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, and points out the ways to develop the industrial dislocation in this area, that is, Beijing should develop high and new technology industries and producer services, Tianjin should develop petroleum, energy, and equipment manufacturing industries. And Hebei develops modern industry and modern agriculture, thus obtains the reasonable layout of industry in this area. In order to ensure the smooth implementation of industrial transfer, the capital economic circle as a whole should be planned as a whole, coordinated development, industrial transfer should play an active role in the engine, and the industry should focus on upgrading their own level. The innovation of this paper lies in respecting the laws of market orientation and government guidance, grasping the development of the capital economic circle as a whole, paying attention to the radiation function of the core city of the economic circle, and not paying attention to the scope and boundary of the economic circle. In the industrial gradient analysis, the dynamic industry change analysis is added to the industrial transition, that is, to construct a comparative industry growth rate, and to comprehensively judge the industry with the trend of industrial transfer. The paper includes 7 figures, 17 tables and 41 references.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F127

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張少軍;劉志彪;;全球價(jià)值鏈模式的產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移——?jiǎng)恿�、影響與對(duì)中國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)和區(qū)域協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的啟示[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年11期

2 陳剛,張解放;區(qū)際產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的效應(yīng)分析及相應(yīng)政策建議[J];華東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2001年02期

3 沈玉芳,陳江嵐,張超;上海與長(zhǎng)江中上游地區(qū)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的不平衡性及其協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制研究[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年02期

4 黃鐘儀;吳良亞;馬斌;;西部承接?xùn)|部產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇研究——以重慶為例[J];科技管理研究;2009年08期

5 孫啟明;白麗健;彭惠;宋陽(yáng);;區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)波動(dòng)的微觀動(dòng)態(tài)基礎(chǔ):企業(yè)遷移和產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2012年12期

6 王虹;陸冰蕊;張華凱;;承接產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移促進(jìn)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化升級(jí)機(jī)理分析[J];合作經(jīng)濟(jì)與科技;2013年14期

7 陳蕊;熊必琳;;基于改進(jìn)產(chǎn)業(yè)梯度系數(shù)的中國(guó)區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移戰(zhàn)略構(gòu)想[J];中國(guó)科技論壇;2007年08期

8 鄭燕偉;產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移理論初探[J];中共浙江省委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

9 李小建,覃成林,高建華;我國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移與中原經(jīng)濟(jì)崛起[J];中州學(xué)刊;2004年03期

10 周春山;劉毅;;廣東省產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移對(duì)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)差異的影響分析[J];云南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2205165