發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-04 07:11

  本文選題：印度 + 經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展�。� 參考：《山東師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：進(jìn)入21世紀(jì)，印度的經(jīng)濟(jì)迅猛增長(zhǎng)引起了世人的廣泛關(guān)注。作為世界上經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)最快而又采用不同發(fā)展模式的兩個(gè)發(fā)展中國(guó)家，中國(guó)和印度不可避免地成為了世人對(duì)比研究的熱點(diǎn)。通過(guò)對(duì)中印經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的比較，可為我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)轉(zhuǎn)變提供一定的理論借鑒意義。 本文借助區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)理論和經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)模式理論，，以及一些最新的研究成果，探索21世紀(jì)印度經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展特點(diǎn)以及比較中印兩國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展模式、發(fā)展特征等。論文分為五個(gè)部分:第一部分提出研究背景及意義，國(guó)內(nèi)外有關(guān)研究現(xiàn)狀述評(píng)。第二部分闡述區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的基礎(chǔ)理論，包括經(jīng)濟(jì)起飛理論、創(chuàng)新與傳播理論、二元經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)理論、區(qū)域生產(chǎn)綜合體理論、梯度推移發(fā)展理論、增長(zhǎng)極開(kāi)發(fā)理論、點(diǎn)軸開(kāi)發(fā)理論、網(wǎng)絡(luò)開(kāi)發(fā)理論等內(nèi)容。第三部分對(duì)印度的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展特征進(jìn)行分析，探討三次產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展、經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的結(jié)構(gòu)性特征和外資外貿(mào)對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的作用。第四部分對(duì)中印經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行比較，主要從軟件服務(wù)業(yè)、硬件軟件基礎(chǔ)、未來(lái)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力和各自經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展所面臨的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析對(duì)比。最后，第五部分論述印度發(fā)展模式的啟示和對(duì)中國(guó)的借鑒意義。 論文研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，在經(jīng)濟(jì)的規(guī)模、結(jié)構(gòu)、外資外貿(mào)的發(fā)展、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)、人口整體素質(zhì)、政府的權(quán)威、政策執(zhí)行的效率、經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)分配對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的拉動(dòng)等方面，中國(guó)領(lǐng)先于印度；而在社會(huì)民主程度、經(jīng)濟(jì)自由化、私營(yíng)企業(yè)的培育、利用外資的效率、法律制度、金融證券體系的完善程度、與歐美發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家的文化融合、英語(yǔ)的普及程度、軟件服務(wù)業(yè)的發(fā)展、擴(kuò)大國(guó)內(nèi)需求方面，中國(guó)暫時(shí)還落后于印度。中印兩國(guó)的發(fā)展模式各有利弊，在不同方面各自具有競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力。中國(guó)和印度經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的差距正在逐步縮小，甚至印度的GDP增長(zhǎng)速度將很快會(huì)超過(guò)中國(guó)；但是至少在二十年內(nèi)印度難以趕超中國(guó)，中國(guó)仍然會(huì)繼續(xù)領(lǐng)先于印度。這一點(diǎn)與許多國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者的“印度經(jīng)濟(jì)將在十年內(nèi)趕超中國(guó)”的看法大相徑庭。
[Abstract]:In the 21 st century, India's rapid economic growth has aroused widespread concern. As two developing countries with the fastest economic growth and different development models, China and India have inevitably become the focus of comparative research. By comparing the economic development between China and India, it can provide some theoretical reference for China's economic growth transformation. With the help of regional economic growth theory, economic growth model theory and some latest research results, this paper explores the characteristics of India's economic development in the 21st century and compares the economic development patterns and development characteristics between China and India. The thesis is divided into five parts: the first part puts forward the research background and significance, domestic and foreign related research review. The second part describes the basic theories of regional economic development, including economic take-off theory, innovation and communication theory, dual economic structure theory, regional production complex theory, gradient development theory, growth pole development theory. Point axis development theory, network development theory and so on. The third part analyzes the characteristics of India's economic development, discusses the three industrial development, the structural characteristics of economic growth and the role of foreign trade on economic growth. The fourth part compares the characteristics of economic development between China and India, mainly from the software service industry, hardware and software foundation, future competitiveness and the problems faced by their respective economic development. Finally, the fifth part discusses the enlightenment of India's development model and its significance to China. The paper finds that China is ahead of India in economic scale, structure, development of foreign trade, infrastructure construction, overall quality of population, authority of government, efficiency of policy implementation and economic structure distribution. On the other hand, the degree of social democracy, economic liberalization, the cultivation of private enterprises, the efficiency of utilizing foreign capital, the legal system, the perfection of the financial and securities system, the cultural integration with the developed countries in Europe and the United States, and the popularity of English, China lags behind India for the development of software services and the expansion of domestic demand. China and India have their own advantages and disadvantages and are competitive in different ways. The gap between China and India is narrowing, and even India's GDP growth will soon outpace China's; but India will struggle to catch up with China for at least two decades, and China will continue to lead India. This contradicts the view of many domestic and foreign scholars that India's economy will overtake China within a decade.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F135.1;F124.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 姜廣東;;印度經(jīng)濟(jì)會(huì)超越中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)嗎?——一個(gè)理論與經(jīng)驗(yàn)視角的分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2008年09期

2 王學(xué)人;;印度基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施及公共服務(wù)領(lǐng)域的公私合作[J];城市問(wèn)題;2009年03期

3 趙偉;;對(duì)外開(kāi)放與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng):中國(guó)與印度的比較——后冷戰(zhàn)以來(lái)績(jī)效與分析框架[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2011年01期

4 周建華;;對(duì)外貿(mào)易、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)——基于中國(guó)和印度的比較[J];東南亞南亞研究;2010年04期

5 吳宗杰;王秀娟;;中印服務(wù)業(yè)國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力差異比較分析[J];東岳論叢;2009年11期

6 華民;;中國(guó)和印度經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展面對(duì)的挑戰(zhàn)[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2006年03期

7 李曉;;印度經(jīng)濟(jì)能夠趕超中國(guó)嗎?——兼“論中印比較”的意義[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2006年06期

8 王秋實(shí);;印度經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展模式對(duì)我國(guó)中長(zhǎng)期發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略的啟示[J];財(cái)經(jīng)界(學(xué)術(shù)版);2014年01期

9 尹國(guó)勝;中印兩國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)改革之比較研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題探索;2003年08期

10 王俊周;;印度經(jīng)濟(jì):面臨重重困難[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2011年27期

本文編號(hào)：1842082