本文選題：公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺 + 治理模式��； 參考：《南京工業(yè)大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：目前各級政府為了加快產(chǎn)業(yè)的提檔升級，落實創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動戰(zhàn)略，，建設(shè)公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺的需求十分迫切。但是由于我國公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺的建設(shè)歷史不長，缺乏足夠的建設(shè)經(jīng)驗積累。而且，公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺主要是面向產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚區(qū)或園區(qū)的中小企業(yè)，提供共性技術(shù)服務(wù)，不同的區(qū)域經(jīng)濟狀況或者不同的企業(yè)需求決定著平臺的建設(shè)運營模式都有所不同。如何根據(jù)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟基礎(chǔ)、立足企業(yè)需求，根據(jù)不同的具體情況來選擇合適的平臺治理模式，以充分發(fā)揮公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺的技術(shù)支撐作用，是政府、企業(yè)等各方都最為關(guān)心的問題。但是專門研究公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺的理論文獻較少，且現(xiàn)有研究多集中在公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺的功能、作用等方面，對于平臺的實際建設(shè)和運營工作不能給與足夠的指導。 本文首先對現(xiàn)有的理論文獻加以回顧，從公共產(chǎn)品理論、公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺的研究現(xiàn)狀以及治理的概念和治理模式等方面梳理相關(guān)研究成果，從中吸取可資借鑒的思想并總結(jié)存在的不足。 其次，在分析了公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺的性質(zhì)、特征及平臺主體要素的基礎(chǔ)上，從平臺投資者和平臺建設(shè)運營主體兩個維度來劃分公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺的治理模式類型。繼而提取出平臺服務(wù)內(nèi)容、服務(wù)群體、技術(shù)稀缺性、平臺外部環(huán)境這四個影響公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺治理模式選擇的因素，在影響因素和治理模式類型之間構(gòu)建起聯(lián)系。 接著，依據(jù)復制法則選取兩個不同治理模式的公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺樣本，在理論分析的框架和邏輯指引下，利用收集到的資料數(shù)據(jù)對其進行案例分析，對前述理論命題進行驗證。 最后，通過以上分析，得出如下結(jié)論：第一、公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺作為準公共產(chǎn)品，應由政府作為平臺主要投資方，同時吸引企業(yè)、高�？蒲性核墓餐瑓⑴c。第二、公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺根據(jù)投資主體和建設(shè)運營主體的不同，可以劃分為政府投資、政府建設(shè)運營模式和混合投資、企業(yè)/高�？蒲性核ㄔO(shè)運營模式。第三、公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺的服務(wù)內(nèi)容、服務(wù)群體、所提供服務(wù)的技術(shù)稀缺性以及平臺所處環(huán)境四個因素決定著平臺的治理模式選擇。
[Abstract]:At present, governments at all levels are in urgent need of accelerating the upgrading of industries, implementing innovation-driven strategies, and building public technology service platforms. But because our country public technology service platform construction history is not long, lacks sufficient construction experience accumulates. Moreover, the public technology service platform is mainly oriented to the small and medium-sized enterprises in the industrial agglomeration area or the park, which provides common technology service. Different regional economic situation or different enterprise demand determine the construction and operation mode of the platform are different. It is the government that how to choose the appropriate platform governance mode according to the regional economic base, the enterprise demand and the different specific conditions, in order to give full play to the technical support function of the public technology service platform. Enterprises and other parties are most concerned about issues. However, there are few theoretical documents devoted to the research of public technology service platform, and the existing research focuses on the function and function of public technology service platform, which can not give enough guidance to the actual construction and operation of the platform. This paper first reviews the existing theoretical literature, combing the relevant research results from the public product theory, the research status of public technology service platform, the concept and governance model of governance, and so on. Draw from the ideas that can be used for reference and sum up the shortcomings. Secondly, on the basis of analyzing the nature, characteristics and main elements of public technology service platform, this paper divides the governance mode of public technology service platform from the two dimensions of platform investors and platform construction operators. Then extract the platform service content, service group, technology scarcity, platform external environment, these four factors affect the choice of public technology service platform governance mode, and establish a relationship between the influencing factors and governance model types. Then, two samples of public technology service platform with different governance models are selected according to the replication rules. Under the framework of theoretical analysis and logical guidance, the data collected are used to analyze the case to verify the above theoretical proposition. Finally, through the above analysis, the following conclusions are drawn: first, as a quasi-public product, the public technology service platform should be taken by the government as the main investor of the platform, while attracting the joint participation of enterprises and scientific research institutes of colleges and universities. Secondly, the public technology service platform can be divided into government investment, government construction and operation mode and mixed investment, enterprise / university scientific research institute construction and operation mode according to the difference between the investment subject and the construction and operation main body. Thirdly, the service content, the service group, the technology scarcity of the service and the environment of the public technical service platform determine the choice of the governance mode of the platform.
【學位授予單位】：南京工業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D630

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王兮;;公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺的建設(shè)模式探析[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2014年15期

2 ;[J];;年期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 沈錫權(quán);中小企業(yè)共性技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺現(xiàn)狀和功能分析[N];中國國門時報;2008年

2 遼寧省中小企業(yè)廳供稿;遼寧省中小企業(yè)公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺[N];中國工業(yè)報;2010年

3 本報深度報道組記者 張璐;破解“公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺”建設(shè)難題[N];南京日報;2012年

4 記者 朱宇 黎欣剛 通訊員 張彩娜;十大公共服務(wù)平臺建成投運[N];寧波日報;2011年

5 霍峰 宋娜 楊敏;青島首個生物公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺通過專家驗收[N];中國高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)導報;2006年

6 孫路平;我市新增兩個公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺[N];丹東日報;2010年

7 李明;公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺助推江蘇丹陽中小企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型發(fā)展[N];中國高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)導報;2011年

8 浙江省質(zhì)監(jiān)局 陳賽云;建設(shè)公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺 促進經(jīng)濟發(fā)展方式轉(zhuǎn)型[N];中國質(zhì)量報;2010年

9 吳姍;服裝業(yè)公共技術(shù)服務(wù)平臺啟用[N];黃石日報;2008年

10 韓國建　Q孟推

本文編號：1793486