產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、金融發(fā)展與中國地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長差異
本文選題:產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu) + 金融發(fā)展; 參考:《華東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:改革開放后的近四十年里,中國經(jīng)濟(jì)高速增長,經(jīng)濟(jì)總量已穩(wěn)居全球第二。但經(jīng)濟(jì)增速下滑,產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)化緩慢,金融發(fā)展水平與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級的匹配效應(yīng)低等問題日益突出。中國經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的神話在一定程度上呈現(xiàn)減弱趨勢,并宣告從此進(jìn)入了"新常態(tài)"的時(shí)代。與此同時(shí),我國區(qū)域間經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平差距也逐漸拉大,產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與金融發(fā)展水平不均衡現(xiàn)象也愈演愈烈。如何調(diào)整產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu),創(chuàng)造適宜經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)發(fā)展的金融環(huán)境,縮小區(qū)域間經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展差距,對我國未來能否成功實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型具有重大戰(zhàn)略意義。因此,本文從產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、金融發(fā)展、經(jīng)濟(jì)增長這三大核心點(diǎn)出發(fā),首先總結(jié)了前人的研究成果,系統(tǒng)地梳理了產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與金融發(fā)展、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長以及金融發(fā)展與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長間相互關(guān)系的理論,并在此基礎(chǔ)上總結(jié)了產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與金融發(fā)展共同對經(jīng)濟(jì)增長影響的內(nèi)在機(jī)制;其次,考察了歷年來我國經(jīng)濟(jì)增長情況、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變遷與金融發(fā)展深化的歷程,并分區(qū)域地歸納了發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀與特征,加深了對區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)變遷的認(rèn)識。再次,通過使用2003-2014年的我國31個(gè)省級面板數(shù)據(jù),構(gòu)建了我國產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、金融發(fā)展與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的一般經(jīng)濟(jì)模型,并分東、中、西部三個(gè)地區(qū),對比考察了地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的內(nèi)在機(jī)制,解釋了形成這種差異化的內(nèi)在原因。最后根據(jù)實(shí)證結(jié)論得出了相應(yīng)的政策建議。本文的研究結(jié)論如下:(1)目前我國產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)對經(jīng)濟(jì)增長促進(jìn)效應(yīng)較大的為資本密集型產(chǎn)業(yè),技術(shù)密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)的推動作用仍有待提高。(2)我國金融發(fā)展水平對經(jīng)濟(jì)增長起到推動作用,并且其作用要弱于產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)對經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的影響。(3)我國產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與金融發(fā)展水平之間形成了有效的共同促進(jìn)機(jī)制,但是共同推動效果較弱,仍有較大的進(jìn)步空間。(4)相較于我國東部地區(qū),中西部地區(qū)的金融發(fā)展水平對經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的作用渠道并不暢通,仍需進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng)地區(qū)金融發(fā)展水平,完善金融體系與市場機(jī)制的共同作用體系。(5)我國經(jīng)濟(jì)增長、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、金融發(fā)展水平之間還未形成一個(gè)高效的、完整的內(nèi)在運(yùn)作機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:In the past 40 years since the reform and opening up, China's economy has grown at a high speed and its total economic output has steadily ranked second in the world.However, the economic growth rate is declining, the industrial structure evolves slowly, and the matching effect between the financial development level and the industrial structure upgrading is low.To some extent, the myth of China's economic growth shows a weakening trend and declares that it has entered the era of "new normal".At the same time, the gap between regional economic development level and the imbalance between industrial structure and financial development level is gradually widening.How to adjust the industrial structure, create a suitable financial environment for the development of economic structure, and narrow the gap between regional economic development is of great strategic significance for the successful economic transformation of our country in the future.Therefore, starting from the three core points of industrial structure, financial development and economic growth, this paper first summarizes the previous research results and systematically combs the industrial structure and financial development.Based on the theory of the relationship between industrial structure and economic growth and between financial development and economic growth, the paper summarizes the internal mechanism of the influence of industrial structure and financial development on economic growth.This paper examines the history of economic growth, industrial structure change and financial development in China over the years, and summarizes the present situation and characteristics of development in different regions, thus deepening the understanding of the changes of regional economic structure.Thirdly, by using the 31 provincial panel data from 2003 to 2014, the general economic model of China's industrial structure, financial development and economic growth is constructed, which is divided into three regions: east, middle and west.The internal mechanism of regional economic growth is compared and the internal reasons for the differentiation are explained.Finally, according to the empirical conclusions of the corresponding policy recommendations.The research conclusions of this paper are as follows: (1) at present, the promotion effect of industrial structure on economic growth in China is greater than that of capital-intensive industries, while that of technology-intensive industries still needs to be improved.) the level of financial development in China plays a role in promoting economic growth.And its function is weaker than the influence of industrial structure on economic growth.Compared with the eastern region of China, the financial development level in the central and western regions does not have an unimpeded role in economic growth, and the level of regional financial development still needs to be further strengthened.Perfecting the common action system of financial system and market mechanism. (5) China's economic growth, industrial structure and financial development level have not yet formed an efficient and complete internal operating mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:F832.7;F127
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 冷艷麗;杜思正;;金融發(fā)展、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長[J];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年05期
2 王濤;石丹;;金融發(fā)展水平、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)失衡與區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長[J];海南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版);2016年03期
3 王銳;朱顯平;;產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、城鎮(zhèn)化與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長——基于省際面板數(shù)據(jù)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)分析[J];中國流通經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年04期
4 盧學(xué)法;杜傳忠;;新常態(tài)下產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變動與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長——基于省級動態(tài)面板數(shù)據(jù)的GMM方法[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2016年02期
5 王妤;李劍;;新常態(tài)下的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)關(guān)系研究[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年02期
6 于斌斌;;產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整與生產(chǎn)率提升的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長效應(yīng)——基于中國城市動態(tài)空間面板模型的分析[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年12期
7 易信;劉鳳良;;金融發(fā)展、技術(shù)創(chuàng)新與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)型——多部門內(nèi)生增長理論分析框架[J];管理世界;2015年10期
8 聞學(xué);查華超;;安徽金融發(fā)展、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長——基于SVAR模型分析[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2015年05期
9 李春生;張連城;;我國經(jīng)濟(jì)增長與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的互動關(guān)系研究——基于VAR模型的實(shí)證分析[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年06期
10 蘇建軍;徐璋勇;;金融發(fā)展、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長——理論與經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年02期
,本文編號:1759170
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/quyujingjilunwen/1759170.html