本文選題：廣西中越邊境　切入點(diǎn)：喀斯特地區(qū)　出處：《廣西師范學(xué)院》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：廣西中越邊境地區(qū)獨(dú)特的喀斯特地貌造就了豐富多樣的喀斯特自然景觀，其景觀質(zhì)量甚至不亞于桂林山水。近年來，廣西中越邊境地區(qū)以“中越神秘邊關(guān)”為旅游品牌，吸引了不少游客前來探秘，但從總體上看，旅游業(yè)發(fā)展仍然較為緩慢，未能充分發(fā)揮該地區(qū)的資源優(yōu)勢。因此，提升喀斯特自然生態(tài)旅游景觀價(jià)值，充分發(fā)揮資源優(yōu)勢，對(duì)于推動(dòng)該地區(qū)的生態(tài)旅游發(fā)展具有重要的意義。 通過實(shí)地考察和資料收集，文章提煉出研究區(qū)五種主要的典型自然生態(tài)旅游景觀類型，分別為森林植被景觀、峰叢地貌景觀、河流水體景觀、巖溶洞穴景觀和峽谷景觀。構(gòu)建了廣西中越邊境喀斯特地區(qū)自然生態(tài)旅游景觀價(jià)值評(píng)價(jià)體系，運(yùn)用層次分析法確定評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)權(quán)重，建立了景觀價(jià)值評(píng)價(jià)模型。運(yùn)用評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和評(píng)價(jià)體系對(duì)研究區(qū)內(nèi)的德天瀑布、龍宮仙境、通靈大峽谷等三個(gè)典型喀斯特自然生態(tài)旅游景觀區(qū)進(jìn)行景觀價(jià)值綜合評(píng)價(jià)。并依據(jù)研究區(qū)景觀特點(diǎn)及評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果分別對(duì)這五種典型景觀類型提出景觀價(jià)值提升措施。研究結(jié)果表明： （1）在評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的準(zhǔn)則層中，，美學(xué)價(jià)值最為重要，其他依次為生態(tài)價(jià)值、科學(xué)文化價(jià)值和開發(fā)價(jià)值，其對(duì)總目標(biāo)的權(quán)重值分別為0.4351、0.3092、0.1501、0.1056；評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)層中的優(yōu)美度、自然度、典型度、奇特度、豐富度、組合度、生態(tài)穩(wěn)定性、生態(tài)環(huán)境容量、植被覆蓋率、空氣清新度、科學(xué)研究價(jià)值、科普教育價(jià)值、歷史文化價(jià)值、區(qū)位條件、區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)、可進(jìn)入性、服務(wù)設(shè)施、運(yùn)營管理等18個(gè)指標(biāo)，其對(duì)總目標(biāo)的權(quán)重分別為0.0637、0.0562、0.0790、0.1531、0.0466、0.0366、0.1308、0.0379、0.0702、0.0792、0.0212、0.0787、0.0501、0.0387、0.0080、0.0201、0.0188、0.0201。 （2）三個(gè)典型景觀區(qū)的美學(xué)價(jià)值均相對(duì)較高，其次為生態(tài)價(jià)值，但分?jǐn)?shù)并非特別理想，科學(xué)文化價(jià)值和開發(fā)價(jià)值分?jǐn)?shù)較低，尤其是開發(fā)價(jià)值�？梢娫谠搮^(qū)未來的發(fā)展中，自然生態(tài)旅游景觀的四種價(jià)值均有待提升，特別是開發(fā)價(jià)值應(yīng)當(dāng)受到政府主管部門的重視。 （3）研究區(qū)自然生態(tài)旅游景觀可從美學(xué)價(jià)值、生態(tài)價(jià)值、科學(xué)文化價(jià)值、開發(fā)價(jià)值等為出發(fā)點(diǎn)，依據(jù)各類景觀特點(diǎn)，通過改造林相、挖掘特殊景觀、匹配景觀要素、優(yōu)化觀景視角、優(yōu)化觀賞路線、完善講解系統(tǒng)、提煉地質(zhì)科普、挖掘文化內(nèi)涵、提升可進(jìn)入性、提升服務(wù)設(shè)施、提升管理運(yùn)營等多種措施全方位提升景觀價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:The unique karst landforms in Guangxi's Sino-Vietnamese border area have created rich and diverse karst natural landscapes, and their landscape quality is no less than that of Guilin's. In recent years, Guangxi's Sino-Vietnamese border areas have taken the "Sino-Vietnamese mysterious border crossing" as a tourist brand. Many tourists have been attracted to visit the secret, but on the whole, the development of tourism is still relatively slow, and the resources advantage of this area has not been brought into full play. Therefore, to promote the value of karst natural ecotourism landscape and give full play to the resource advantage, It is of great significance to promote the development of ecotourism in this area. Through on-the-spot investigation and data collection, five main types of typical natural ecotourism landscape in the study area were abstracted, namely forest vegetation landscape, peak cluster landscape, river water landscape, etc. Karst cave landscape and canyon landscape. The evaluation system of natural ecotourism landscape value in karst area of Sino-Vietnam border in Guangxi is constructed, and the weight of evaluation index is determined by AHP. The evaluation model of landscape value is established. The evaluation system is used to evaluate the Detian Falls, Longgong Wonderland in the study area. Comprehensive evaluation of landscape value of three typical karst ecotourism areas including Tongling Grand Canyon is carried out. Based on the landscape characteristics and evaluation results of the study area, the measures to enhance the landscape value of these five typical landscape types are put forward respectively. ... the results of the study indicate that:. In the criterion layer of evaluation index system, aesthetic value is the most important, and the others are ecological value, scientific and cultural value and development value, the weight of which to the total target is 0.4351 / 0.3092 / 0.1501/ 0.1056 respectively; the degree of beauty, naturalness and typicality in the evaluation index layer, Strangeness, richness, combination, ecological stability, ecological environmental capacity, vegetation coverage, air freshness, scientific research value, popular science education value, historical and cultural value, location conditions, regional economic base, accessibility, The weight to the total target of 18 indexes, such as service facilities, operation management and so on, is 0.0637 / 0.0562/ 0.0790 / 0.1531/ 0.0466/ 0.1306 / 0.1308 / 0 / 0.03799 / 0.0702 / 0.0792 / 0.02120.0787/ 0.0501/ 0.03870.00800.02010.01880.0201. (2) the aesthetic value of the three typical landscape areas is relatively high, followed by ecological value, but the score is not particularly ideal, the value of science and culture and the value of development are low, especially the value of development. The four kinds of value of natural ecotourism landscape need to be improved, especially the value of development should be paid attention to by the government. 3) the natural ecotourism landscape in the research area can be regarded as the starting point of aesthetic value, ecological value, scientific and cultural value, development value and so on. According to the characteristics of all kinds of landscape, the special landscape can be excavated and the landscape elements can be matched. Optimizing the view angle, optimizing the viewing route, perfecting the explanation system, refining the geological science popularization, excavating the cultural connotation, enhancing the investibility, enhancing the service facilities, enhancing the management and operation, and so on, all kinds of measures to enhance the landscape value in all directions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F592.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李暉;王月;王艷分;;桂林會(huì)仙喀斯特濕地生態(tài)環(huán)境調(diào)查及生態(tài)旅游開發(fā)[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2010年27期

2 肖篤寧;解伏菊;魏建兵;;景觀價(jià)值與景觀保護(hù)評(píng)價(jià)[J];地理科學(xué);2006年04期

3 保繼剛;喀斯特洞穴旅游開發(fā)[J];地理學(xué)報(bào);1995年04期

4 程道品;劉宏盈;葉曄;;桂林喀斯特景觀開發(fā)建議與對(duì)策研究[J];東南亞縱橫;2006年02期

5 莊志民;旅游美學(xué)的基本內(nèi)涵及其理論框架[J];桂林旅游高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);1999年S2期

6 劉宏盈;程道品;葉曄;;桂林喀斯特景觀分類與評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];廣西師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2006年S1期

7 李興中;興義馬嶺河喀斯特景觀及旅游開發(fā)探討[J];貴州地質(zhì);1999年02期

8 李興中;貴州高原喀斯特景觀及其旅游形象[J];貴州地質(zhì);2002年02期

9 李杰義;陳端呂;;張家界旅游景觀的系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)及其調(diào)控優(yōu)化[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2012年04期

10 方海川;景觀及旅游景觀特征探討[J];樂山師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 龔克;桂林喀斯特區(qū)生態(tài)旅游資源評(píng)價(jià)與開發(fā)戰(zhàn)略管理研究[D];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)(北京);2012年

本文編號(hào)：1682297