本文選題：獨聯(lián)體　切入點：俄羅斯　出處：《黑龍江大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：黨的十八大《報告》指出，當前我國處于深化改革關鍵期，我們面臨的發(fā)展問題很多，經(jīng)濟結構不合理、生態(tài)破壞嚴重、國際環(huán)境不穩(wěn)定等因素制約著中國經(jīng)濟持續(xù)健康發(fā)展。為了達到全面建成小康社會和全面深化改革開放的目標，十八大明確提出了加快轉變經(jīng)濟發(fā)展方式的重大任務。國內(nèi)學術界加強了對中國轉變經(jīng)濟發(fā)展方式的研究，對發(fā)達國家的相關研究也有一些，，但對與我國同樣處于經(jīng)濟轉型期的獨聯(lián)體國家相關研究還不夠系統(tǒng)。獨聯(lián)體國家經(jīng)濟發(fā)展方式轉變的目標是什么？2008年金融危機發(fā)生后獨聯(lián)體國家轉變經(jīng)濟發(fā)展方式的路徑是什么？采取了哪些具體措施？我們能夠借鑒哪些經(jīng)驗？本文從闡述經(jīng)濟發(fā)展方式的內(nèi)涵、衡量指標以及轉變經(jīng)濟發(fā)展方式基本路徑入手，分析了獨聯(lián)體國家在金融危機后經(jīng)濟發(fā)展方式現(xiàn)狀，指出獨聯(lián)體國家經(jīng)濟結構不均衡，需求結構呈現(xiàn)居民消費和進出口增速較快而固定資產(chǎn)增速緩慢的畸形形態(tài)；產(chǎn)業(yè)結構中第三產(chǎn)業(yè)比重過低；要素結構中資源要素利用率高，科技教育創(chuàng)新等要素利用不足。文章認為獨聯(lián)體國家經(jīng)濟結構畸形、增長方式粗放和增長質(zhì)量脆弱等問題，嚴重制約了經(jīng)濟發(fā)展方式轉型。產(chǎn)生問題的根源既有歷史因素、資源稟賦因素、經(jīng)濟轉軌因素又有經(jīng)濟全球化、科技全球化等多方面的因素，因此也決定了獨聯(lián)體國家轉變經(jīng)濟發(fā)展方式具有系統(tǒng)性、艱巨性和戰(zhàn)略性的特征。獨聯(lián)體國家對轉變經(jīng)濟發(fā)展方式進行了多方面的探索，其基本路徑是體制機制改革、產(chǎn)業(yè)結構優(yōu)化、所有制結構優(yōu)化和發(fā)展技術創(chuàng)新等，而創(chuàng)新是獨聯(lián)體國家轉變經(jīng)濟發(fā)展方式的根本路徑。獨聯(lián)體國家從產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新、企業(yè)創(chuàng)新、堅持人才發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略和依靠次級區(qū)域經(jīng)濟一體化等幾方面努力打造新的核心競爭力，激發(fā)動力和活力，推動經(jīng)濟發(fā)展方式的順利轉變。
[Abstract]:The "report" of the 18 National Congress of the CPC pointed out that at present, China is in a critical period of deepening reform. We are faced with many development problems, the economic structure is unreasonable, and the ecological damage is serious. In order to achieve the goal of building a well-off society in an all-round way and deepening reform and opening up in an all-round way, China's sustained and healthy economic development is restricted by factors such as the instability of the international environment. The 18 National Congress clearly put forward the major task of speeding up the transformation of economic development mode. The domestic academic circles have strengthened the research on China's transformation of economic development mode, and there have also been some related studies on developed countries. But the research on the CIS countries which are also in the economic transition period is not systematic enough. What is the goal of the transformation of the economic development mode of the CIS countries? In 2008, after the financial crisis, what is the path for the CIS countries to change the mode of economic development? What specific measures have been taken? What experience can we learn from? Starting with the connotation of the mode of economic development, the measurement index and the basic path of transforming the mode of economic development, this paper analyzes the present situation of the mode of economic development of the CIS countries after the financial crisis, and points out that the economic structure of the CIS countries is not balanced. The structure of demand presents a deformity of rapid growth of consumption, import and export of residents but slow growth of fixed assets; low proportion of tertiary industry in industrial structure; high utilization rate of resource elements in element structure; The paper points out that the problems of economic structure malformation, extensive growth mode and fragile growth quality in CIS countries have seriously restricted the transformation of economic development mode. The factors of resource endowment, economic transition, economic globalization, scientific and technological globalization, and so on, have also determined that the transformation of the economic development mode of the CIS countries is systematic. The CIS countries have made various explorations to change the mode of economic development. Their basic paths are institutional mechanism reform, optimization of industrial structure, optimization of ownership structure and development of technological innovation, etc. Innovation is the fundamental way for the CIS countries to change their economic development mode. The CIS countries strive to build new core competitiveness from the aspects of industrial innovation, enterprise innovation, adherence to the strategy of talent development and relying on the economic integration of sub-regions. Stimulate power and vitality, promote the smooth transformation of economic development mode.
【學位授予單位】：黑龍江大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F113

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李郇;殷江濱;;國外區(qū)域一體化對產(chǎn)業(yè)影響研究綜述[J];城市規(guī)劃;2012年05期

2 戚文海;;俄羅斯高層應對國際金融危機根本路徑:反思與舉措[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐市場;2009年07期

3 戚文海;經(jīng)濟轉軌國家的國家創(chuàng)新體系評析——以俄羅斯為研究案例[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2005年05期

4 陳新明;;俄羅斯與獨聯(lián)體國家關系:新趨勢與新戰(zhàn)略[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2009年04期

5 徐坡嶺;韓爽;;后危機時期轉型國家經(jīng)濟復蘇與增長的特點及其前景[J];俄羅斯學刊;2011年01期

6 景維民;郎夢圓;;蘇聯(lián)、俄羅斯經(jīng)濟增長方式的轉變及其對中國的啟示[J];俄羅斯學刊;2011年03期

7 余南平;李秋悅;;后金融危機時代俄羅斯經(jīng)濟轉型評估[J];俄羅斯研究;2012年03期

8 郭連成;楊宏;王鑫;;全球產(chǎn)業(yè)結構變動與俄羅斯產(chǎn)業(yè)結構調(diào)整和產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2012年06期

9 王志遠;;俄羅斯與中亞:區(qū)域經(jīng)濟整合的新亮點[J];俄羅斯學刊;2013年05期

10 戚文海;;后金融危機時期俄羅斯發(fā)展創(chuàng)新經(jīng)濟的新趨向[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐市場;2012年02期

本文編號：1626973