本文關(guān)鍵詞：新重商主義理論研究和實(shí)踐分析　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 新重商主義 自由主義 區(qū)域一體化

【摘要】：新重商主義是重商主義的思想在新的時(shí)代的嶄新體現(xiàn),早期用來(lái)解釋美國(guó)的一系列貿(mào)易保護(hù)的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)新思想。隨著世界各國(guó)貿(mào)易活動(dòng)程度的加深與范圍的拓廣,對(duì)新重商主義的研究也更加深入。經(jīng)過(guò)長(zhǎng)期的研究經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家們發(fā)現(xiàn)新重商主義早在美國(guó)貿(mào)易保護(hù)政策之前已經(jīng)產(chǎn)生并可以有效的解決凱恩斯主義滯漲遺留的一系列目前無(wú)法解決的經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題,經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家已對(duì)新重商主義的當(dāng)前地位給予了肯定,認(rèn)為新重商主義是解決當(dāng)前世界經(jīng)濟(jì)難題的方法之一。新重商主義主要思想繼續(xù)古老的重商主義的基本理念:國(guó)家宏觀調(diào)控發(fā)展貿(mào)易、通過(guò)貿(mào)易順差獲得資本積累。這無(wú)疑是非常適應(yīng)當(dāng)前全球化的程度日益增高的全球市場(chǎng)。近年來(lái)無(wú)論是強(qiáng)國(guó)還是弱國(guó)都對(duì)新重商主義非常重視,但是基于各種原因各國(guó)的實(shí)施程度大相徑庭,例如相對(duì)完整的日本新重商主義,實(shí)施部分新重商主義外貿(mào)政策的美國(guó),但是都對(duì)于解決當(dāng)前問(wèn)題效果顯著。因此新重商主義一度被認(rèn)為是一種比新凱恩斯主義與新自由主義更適應(yīng)當(dāng)前世界格局的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)主義。但是伴隨著區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化的發(fā)展壯大,直至世界上第一個(gè)完整強(qiáng)大的區(qū)域一體化集團(tuán)----歐盟的成立,各國(guó)發(fā)現(xiàn)區(qū)域一體化比新重商主義更為快速有效的解決經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題,它所推崇的區(qū)域內(nèi)完全自由思想也被自由主義學(xué)者認(rèn)為是自由主義與初步全球化的完美體現(xiàn)。不過(guò)隨著歐盟的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展,內(nèi)部的自由化程度更深,歐盟對(duì)于外界的貿(mào)易問(wèn)題也逐步體現(xiàn)出來(lái),各種形式的貿(mào)易壁壘開始建立在歐盟與世界各國(guó)之間,歐盟與各國(guó)的貿(mào)易也從自由逐步轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)榉e累資本、追求貿(mào)易順差的趨勢(shì),這和新重商主義的基本理念類似。為探究區(qū)域一體化的轉(zhuǎn)變究竟是不是只是新重商主義的一種新的實(shí)踐方式,本文將對(duì)比較典型的新重商主義國(guó)家日本進(jìn)行分析,總結(jié)新重商主義的本質(zhì)與具體政策體現(xiàn),再進(jìn)一步的對(duì)美國(guó)與歐盟進(jìn)行案例比較與分析,結(jié)合Combessaadi-sedik和Leamer的計(jì)量方法,再對(duì)美國(guó)與歐盟的貿(mào)易政策進(jìn)行定量分析,驗(yàn)證歐盟確實(shí)采用了新重商主義的貿(mào)易政策,并比美國(guó)的新重商主義貿(mào)易系數(shù)更高,以此證明歐盟的區(qū)域一體化是一種新重商主義實(shí)踐的新方式。
[Abstract]:Neo-mercantilism is a new embodiment of mercantilism in the new era. It is used to explain a series of new economic ideas of trade protection in the United States in the early stage. With the deepening of the degree of trade activities and the expansion of the scope of various countries in the world. After a long period of research economists have found that neo-mercantilism has emerged long before the United States trade protection policy and can effectively solve the legacy of Keynesian stagflation. List current economic problems that cannot be solved. Economists have affirmed the current status of neo-mercantilism. It is considered that neo-mercantilism is one of the ways to solve the problems in the world economy. The main idea of neo-mercantilism is to continue the basic idea of ancient mercantilism: state macro-control to develop trade. Capital accumulation through the trade surplus is undoubtedly a global market that is well adapted to the increasing degree of globalization. In recent years, both powerful and weak countries have attached great importance to neo-mercantilism. However, the degree of implementation varies greatly for various reasons, such as the relatively complete Japanese neo-mercantilism and the United States, which implements part of the neo-mercantilist foreign trade policy. Therefore, neo-mercantilism was once considered to be a kind of economicism which is more suitable to the current world pattern than neo-Keynesianism and neoliberalism. But it is accompanied by a regional economy. The development of the body. Until the establishment of the European Union, the world's first integrated and powerful regional integration group, countries found that regional integration was more efficient than neo-mercantilism in solving economic problems. The idea of complete freedom in the region is also regarded by liberalism scholars as the perfect embodiment of liberalism and preliminary globalization, but with the further development of the European Union, the degree of internal liberalization is deeper. European Union for the external trade problems are gradually reflected, various forms of trade barriers began to be established between the European Union and the rest of the world, trade between the European Union and other countries has gradually changed from freedom to capital accumulation. The trend of pursuing trade surplus is similar to the basic idea of neo-mercantilism. In order to find out whether the transformation of regional integration is just a new practical way of neo-mercantilism. This paper will analyze the typical neo-mercantilism country Japan, sum up the essence and concrete policy embodiment of neo-mercantilism, and further compare and analyze the case between the United States and the European Union. Combined with the measurement methods of Combessaadi-sedik and Leamer, the quantitative analysis of the trade policy between the United States and the European Union is carried out. It is proved that the European Union's regional integration is a new way of new mercantilism practice by verifying that the European Union has adopted the new mercantilist trade policy and has a higher trade coefficient than the American new mercantilism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F091.31

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 羅淑媚;;從輪胎特保案論述美國(guó)當(dāng)前的新重商主義[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2010年05期

2 劉時(shí)維;;美國(guó)的新重商主義與我國(guó)必須應(yīng)對(duì)的挑戰(zhàn)[J];吉林省經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

3 王宏淼;;中國(guó)的“新重商主義”及其改進(jìn)思路：對(duì)外開放模式的一個(gè)審視[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2008年04期

4 關(guān)春玉;;重商主義的分析研究及新重商主義的弊端分析[J];天津市財(cái)貿(mào)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

5 胡燕喃;;論“新重商主義”[J];中國(guó)市場(chǎng);2008年26期

6 張潔;;美國(guó)的新重商主義與中國(guó)的貿(mào)易政策選擇[J];吉林省經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期

7 張?zhí)礻?yáng);;論現(xiàn)代貿(mào)易中的新重商主義[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2010年05期

8 吳少云;;對(duì)中美輪胎特保案的新重商主義視角分析[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2010年09期

9 王勝偉;劉家誠(chéng);;中國(guó)新重商主義的特征、困境與對(duì)策分析[J];中國(guó)集體經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年16期

10 W.霍金斯 ,金日;新重商主義:當(dāng)前有征收關(guān)稅的理由嗎?[J];國(guó)外社會(huì)科學(xué);1984年06期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 本報(bào)評(píng)論員 笑蜀;市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的鴨,抑或新重商主義的雞?[N];南方周末;2010年

2 中國(guó)醫(yī)藥保健品進(jìn)出口商會(huì)綜合部主任 許銘;“新重商主義”攻擊下外貿(mào)何去何從[N];醫(yī)藥經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 付明松;中美新重商主義比較分析[D];大連海事大學(xué);2015年

2 戴安然;新重商主義理論研究和實(shí)踐分析[D];山東大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號(hào)：1400260