本文選題：縣域旅游 + 旅游資源�。� 參考：《華僑大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：針對(duì)目前對(duì)區(qū)域旅游資源評(píng)價(jià)存在不完善的問(wèn)題，將生態(tài)位理論引入?yún)^(qū)域旅游資源評(píng)價(jià)研究中，以生態(tài)位相關(guān)理論、系統(tǒng)論、可持續(xù)發(fā)展理論為支撐，并借鑒當(dāng)前旅游生態(tài)位和旅游資源評(píng)價(jià)的研究成果，對(duì)縣域旅游資源生態(tài)位進(jìn)行研究，探索縣域旅游資源開(kāi)發(fā)的和諧發(fā)展之路。通過(guò)文獻(xiàn)綜述分析旅游生態(tài)位的研究現(xiàn)狀及不足，提出未來(lái)的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)，在此基礎(chǔ)上比較分析各旅游資源生態(tài)位相關(guān)概念，歸納出縣域旅游資源生態(tài)位的內(nèi)涵、特征及理論體系。采用專家咨詢的方式構(gòu)建縣域旅游資源生態(tài)位評(píng)價(jià)體系，并運(yùn)用層次分析法確定評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)的權(quán)重。選取泉州市8個(gè)縣域?yàn)檠芯繀^(qū)域，結(jié)合相關(guān)統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù)和專家打分，選取測(cè)量生態(tài)位寬度的Levins指數(shù)和生態(tài)位重疊的Pianka指數(shù)對(duì)泉州市8個(gè)縣域內(nèi)的旅游資源生態(tài)位進(jìn)行測(cè)評(píng)。 根據(jù)測(cè)評(píng)結(jié)果表明：泉州市區(qū)和晉江市的旅游資源占有優(yōu)勢(shì)，在縣域旅游資源種群中處于強(qiáng)勢(shì)地位，永春縣、德化縣安溪縣的旅游資源處于弱勢(shì)地位；泉州市區(qū)與晉江市、晉江市與惠安縣旅游資源生態(tài)位重疊指數(shù)相同，競(jìng)爭(zhēng)強(qiáng)度處于同一階段，市區(qū)與石獅市、惠安縣以及南安市與安溪縣、永春縣、德化縣旅游資源生態(tài)位重疊處于同一階層，都位于第二集團(tuán)的末位；市區(qū)與南安市、安溪縣、德化縣和南安市與石獅市、惠安縣旅游資源生態(tài)位重疊值相對(duì)較小，旅游資源競(jìng)爭(zhēng)程度較低，，旅游資源互補(bǔ)性較強(qiáng)；泉州市各縣域的旅游資源沒(méi)有形成占絕對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)的旅游資源，各縣域利用各種資源開(kāi)發(fā)旅游資源的能力較低，旅游資源生態(tài)位擴(kuò)張的環(huán)境有待于進(jìn)一步優(yōu)化。 通過(guò)泉州8個(gè)縣域旅游資源生態(tài)位的測(cè)度結(jié)果，對(duì)比不同縣域的優(yōu)勢(shì)和劣勢(shì)，采取生態(tài)位錯(cuò)位開(kāi)發(fā)、生態(tài)位分離開(kāi)發(fā)、引進(jìn)生態(tài)位開(kāi)發(fā)策略，提升縣域旅游資源生態(tài)位寬度，增加旅游者數(shù)量，降低縣域旅游資源生態(tài)位重疊，形成不同層次、不同類型的縣域旅游資源布局策略。
[Abstract]:Aiming at the imperfection of regional tourism resources evaluation, the niche theory is introduced into the study of regional tourism resources evaluation, which is supported by niche theory, system theory and sustainable development theory. Based on the current research results of tourism niche and tourism resource evaluation, this paper studies the ecological niche of county tourism resources and explores the road of harmonious development of county tourism resources. Based on the literature review, this paper analyzes the present situation and deficiency of tourism niche research, and puts forward the development trend in the future. On this basis, the relative concepts of tourism resources niche are compared and analyzed, and the connotation of county tourism resource niche is concluded. Characteristics and theoretical system. The ecological niche evaluation system of county tourism resources was constructed by expert consultation, and the weight of the evaluation index was determined by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Eight counties in Quanzhou city were selected as the study area. The Levins index of measuring niche width and the Pianka index of niche overlap were selected to evaluate the ecological niche of tourism resources in 8 counties of Quanzhou city. According to the evaluation results, the tourism resources in Quanzhou and Jinjiang are dominant, and they are in a strong position in the county, Yongchun and Anxi in Dehua are in a weak position, and Quanzhou and Jinjiang are in a weak position. The overlap index of tourism resources niche in Jinjiang city and Huian county is the same, and the competition intensity is in the same stage. The overlap of tourism resources niche between urban area and Shishi city, Huian county, Nanan city and Anxi county, Yongchun county, Dehua county is in the same class. Urban area and Nanan City, Anxi County, Dehua County and Nanan City and Shishi City, Huian County tourism resources niche overlap value is relatively small, tourism resources competition is low, tourism resources are complementary; The tourism resources of every county in Quanzhou City have not formed the tourism resources which occupy the absolute superiority. The ability of exploiting the tourism resources in the counties is low, and the environment of the ecological niche expansion of the tourism resources needs to be further optimized. By comparing the advantages and disadvantages of different counties by measuring the ecological niche of tourism resources in eight counties of Quanzhou, the authors adopt niche dislocation development, niche separation development, the introduction of niche development strategies, and the promotion of the breadth of tourism resources niche in the county region. Increasing the number of tourists, reducing the niche overlap of county tourism resources, forming different levels and different types of county tourism resources layout strategy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：F592.7;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郇亞麗;趙琳;;安徽黟縣旅游對(duì)縣域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展貢獻(xiàn)研究[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年01期

2 孟德友;陸玉麒;;基于生態(tài)位理論的旅游地發(fā)展策略研究——以黔東南州巴拉河流域鄉(xiāng)村旅游區(qū)為例[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2006年21期

3 向延平;;旅游競(jìng)爭(zhēng)研究:生態(tài)位角度分析的新視角[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2009年26期

4 金姝蘭;金威;章新傳;徐磊;;基于生態(tài)位理論的江西旅游網(wǎng)絡(luò)構(gòu)建[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2010年29期

5 李付娥;梁留科;張中波;;河南省旅游競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力生態(tài)位對(duì)比分析[J];商業(yè)研究;2009年07期

6 向延平;陳友蓮;;基于生態(tài)位理論的旅游發(fā)展問(wèn)題探析——以湖南鳳凰為例[J];長(zhǎng)江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自科版)農(nóng)學(xué)卷;2007年04期

7 賀伶俐;袁書(shū)琪;李海峰;;基于生態(tài)位理論的福州市內(nèi)河旅游開(kāi)發(fā)策略[J];重慶師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2010年01期

8 陳鷹;黃磊昌;王祥榮;;區(qū)域旅游規(guī)劃中旅游資源集合區(qū)生態(tài)位的研究[J];城市規(guī)劃;2007年04期

9 祁新華,陳烈,程煜,蔡克光;區(qū)域旅游可持續(xù)發(fā)展的生態(tài)學(xué)透視[J];地理與地理信息科學(xué);2005年01期

10 江金波;余構(gòu)雄;;基于生態(tài)位理論的長(zhǎng)江三角洲區(qū)域旅游競(jìng)合模式研究[J];地理與地理信息科學(xué);2009年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 袁立梅;區(qū)域旅游資源生態(tài)位測(cè)評(píng)與開(kāi)發(fā)策略研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：1954590