本文關(guān)鍵詞： 嶺南 漢墓 陶提筒 比較研究　出處：《廣西師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：陶提筒是嶺南地區(qū)秦漢時(shí)期土著文化中最具代表性的典型器物,大約流行于西漢早期到東漢后期,出土數(shù)量較多,分布區(qū)域較廣,類型復(fù)雜多樣并極具地方特色,為進(jìn)行相關(guān)問題的研究提供了豐富的實(shí)物資料。本文共收錄了嶺南各地出土的二百五十件陶提筒的資料,立足基礎(chǔ)材料,結(jié)合前人的研究成果,對(duì)其進(jìn)行較為系統(tǒng)的研究。全文共分為六個(gè)部分：第一部分對(duì)選題緣由及意義和研究方法作以闡述,并對(duì)陶提筒的研究現(xiàn)狀加以回顧；第二部分簡(jiǎn)述陶提筒的出土概況,首先通過整合嶺南地區(qū)目前漢墓出土陶提筒的資料,從出土地點(diǎn)及分布特征論述陶提筒主要分布在越族地區(qū),其次通過對(duì)出土陶提筒的墓葬形制和器物組合關(guān)系等特征分析說明陶提筒的實(shí)用功能和社會(huì)意義；第三部分運(yùn)用類型學(xué)方法對(duì)嶺南地區(qū)出土陶提筒進(jìn)行型式分析,并找出其演變規(guī)律,同時(shí)結(jié)合隨葬品的組合關(guān)系、出土位置及陶提筒上的銘文分析其用途；第四部分把嶺南西漢早期陶提筒與越南東山文化和云南滇文化出土的銅提筒進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析,探討嶺南陶提筒的淵源,認(rèn)為嶺南漢墓出土的陶提筒源自越南東山文化輸入嶺南的銅提筒,而嶺南、云南以及越南銅提筒也存在緊密的聯(lián)系；第五部分簡(jiǎn)略論述漢武帝統(tǒng)一嶺南后,漢文化對(duì)嶺南陶提筒的影響,并探討嶺南陶提筒與其他地區(qū)陶提筒的早晚關(guān)系,并結(jié)合兩漢各時(shí)期陶提筒的出土情況,研究嶺南漢墓隨葬陶提筒流行的年代,分析兩漢時(shí)期陶提筒所反映的文化交流；第六部分總結(jié)全文,認(rèn)為隨著社會(huì)的發(fā)展和文化的融合,陶提筒象征的社會(huì)意義在漢文化的沖擊下逐漸弱化,財(cái)富觀念逐步加強(qiáng),促使嶺南地區(qū)社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的進(jìn)步和農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,為漢代大一統(tǒng)文化的形成提供了基礎(chǔ),最終是嶺南融入漢代大一統(tǒng)的文化區(qū),與中原地區(qū)進(jìn)入同步發(fā)展的時(shí)期。
[Abstract]:Pottery tube is the most representative of the indigenous culture in the period of Qin and Han dynasties in Lingnan region. It was popular from the early Western Han Dynasty to the late Eastern Han Dynasty. The types are complex and have local characteristics, which provides abundant material for the study of related problems. This paper collected 250 pieces of earthen tubing unearthed in the south of Lingnan, based on the basic materials. The thesis is divided into six parts: the first part expounds the reason and significance of the topic and the research method, and reviews the research status quo of the pottery tube; The second part briefly describes the unearthed outline of the earthenware, first of all through the integration of Lingnan area at present unearthed from the Han tombs of the data, from the unearthed location and distribution characteristics of the main distribution of pottery in the region of Yue. Secondly, the practical function and social significance of the earthenware lifting tube are explained through the analysis of the characteristics of the tomb shape and the combination of the utensils. The third part uses the typology method to analyze the type of the earthenware tube unearthed in Lingnan area, and find out its evolution law, at the same time, combine with the combination relation of the funerary objects, unearthed position and inscription on the earthenware lift tube to analyze its use; In the 4th part, the author makes a comparative analysis of the earthen tubing in the early period of the Western Han Dynasty, the Dongshan culture of Vietnam and the Yunnan Yunnan culture, and probes into the origin of the earthen pottery tubing in the South of the five ridges. It is believed that the unearthed pottery tubs of the Han Tomb in the south of the five ridges originated from the copper tubing imported from the Dong Shan culture of Vietnam, and that there are also close relations among the Lingnan, Yunnan and Vietnam copper drawers. Part 5th briefly discusses the influence of Han culture on the earth-lifting of Lingnan pottery after Emperor Wu Han unified Lingnan, and probes into the relationship between Lingnan pottery lifting and other areas in the morning and evening, and combines with the unearthed situation of the earth-lifting tubing in each period of the Han Dynasty. This paper studies the popular age of pottery lifting in the Han tombs of Lingnan, and analyzes the cultural exchange reflected by the pottery lifting in the Han Dynasty. Part 6th summarizes the full text, with the development of society and the integration of culture, the social significance of the symbol of the pottery tube gradually weakened under the impact of Han culture, and the concept of wealth gradually strengthened. Promoting the progress of social economy and the development of agricultural economy in the south of the five ridges provided the foundation for the formation of the unified culture of the Han Dynasty and finally was the cultural area in which Lingnan was integrated into the unification of the Han Dynasty. And the Central Plains region into the synchronous development of the period.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：K876.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔣廷瑜;西漢南越國時(shí)期的銅桶[J];東南文化;2002年12期

2 王超超;越南東山文化及其起源的有關(guān)問題概述[J];東南亞;1992年02期

3 萬輔彬,,田豐,蔣廷瑜;論田東出土萬家壩型銅鼓的意義[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1997年03期

4 樊海濤;;云南古代貯貝器藝術(shù)[J];長(zhǎng)江文明;2010年03期

5 高占盈;;南越王墓船紋銅提筒紋飾研究[J];華南理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年04期

6 楊豪;;廣東韶關(guān)市郊古墓發(fā)掘報(bào)告[J];考古;1961年08期

7 熊瑛;孫太初;;云南祥云大波那木i柰啄骨謇肀ǜ鎇J];考古;1964年12期

8 ;廣西合浦西漢木i枘筟J];考古;1972年05期

9 ;廣西田東發(fā)現(xiàn)戰(zhàn)國墓葬[J];考古;1979年06期

10 周世榮;;蠶桑紋尊與武士靴形鉞[J];考古;1979年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1487826