【摘要】：自然壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)規(guī)制問(wèn)題一直是產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)領(lǐng)域最為活躍的研究課題之一,也是當(dāng)前中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革的熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題。自20世紀(jì)70年代以來(lái),西方國(guó)家在自然壟斷領(lǐng)域中掀起了一場(chǎng)聲勢(shì)浩大的規(guī)制改革運(yùn)動(dòng),要求在自然壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)領(lǐng)域引入競(jìng)爭(zhēng)機(jī)制。自1994年成立中國(guó)聯(lián)合通信有限公司以來(lái),中國(guó)在電信等傳統(tǒng)自然壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)中拉開了規(guī)制改革的序幕。 目前中國(guó)自然壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)的規(guī)制改革還停留在政企分開和對(duì)原有國(guó)家壟斷格局的分拆上,所形成的只是形式上的競(jìng)爭(zhēng),而對(duì)規(guī)制改革中最核心的問(wèn)題:規(guī)制什么,規(guī)制誰(shuí),對(duì)誰(shuí)規(guī)制,誰(shuí)來(lái)規(guī)制“規(guī)制者”等問(wèn)題并沒(méi)有真正得到解決。 本文以此為背景,從理論和實(shí)踐兩條主線出發(fā),來(lái)分析自然壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)放松規(guī)制的原因及對(duì)策。首先由自然壟斷理論的發(fā)展推進(jìn)了人們對(duì)自然壟斷及其產(chǎn)業(yè)有了新的思索,對(duì)自然壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)與競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性產(chǎn)業(yè)之間的區(qū)分,對(duì)自然壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)中的自然壟斷業(yè)務(wù)和非自然壟斷業(yè)務(wù)之間的劃分都有了新的認(rèn)識(shí);其次政府規(guī)制的失靈、規(guī)制理論的進(jìn)步、規(guī)制改革的不成熟,都要求我們對(duì)原有的規(guī)制進(jìn)行重新思考;結(jié)合西方發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家規(guī)制改革的實(shí)踐和中國(guó)規(guī)制改革的實(shí)際,有必要對(duì)自然壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)政府規(guī)制改革作重新研究,認(rèn)為自然壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)規(guī)制改革中放松規(guī)制與重新規(guī)制必須同步進(jìn)行。
[Abstract]:The regulation of natural monopoly industry has always been one of the most active research topics in the field of industrial economics. Since the 1970s, Western countries have launched a huge regulatory reform movement in the field of natural monopoly, which requires the introduction of competition mechanism in the field of natural monopoly industry. Since the establishment of China United Communications Co., Ltd. in 1994, China has opened the prologue of regulatory reform in traditional natural monopoly industries such as telecommunications. At present, the regulation reform of China's natural monopoly industry is still in the separation of government and enterprise and the division of the original state monopoly pattern, which forms only formal competition, and the core problem in the regulation reform is: what to regulate, who to regulate, The problems of who regulate and who regulate the regulator have not been solved. Based on this background, this paper analyzes the reasons and countermeasures of deregulation of natural monopoly industry from two main lines of theory and practice. Firstly, with the development of natural monopoly theory, people have a new thinking about natural monopoly and its industry, and the distinction between natural monopoly industry and competitive industry. There is a new understanding of the division between the natural monopoly business and the non-natural monopoly business in the natural monopoly industry. Secondly, the failure of government regulation, the progress of regulation theory and the immaturity of regulation reform require us to rethink the original regulation. Combined with the practice of regulation reform in western developed countries and the reality of regulation reform in China, it is necessary to re-study the government regulation reform of natural monopoly industry. It is considered that deregulation and re-regulation must be carried out simultaneously in the regulation reform of natural monopoly industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類號(hào)】：F062.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 戚聿東;自然壟斷管制的理論與實(shí)踐[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2001年12期

2 謝地,魏益華;自然壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)國(guó)有經(jīng)濟(jì)改革與發(fā)展的路徑選擇——有效競(jìng)爭(zhēng)、公眾參與、形象重塑[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2003年06期

3 徐華;我國(guó)自然壟斷行業(yè)的價(jià)格管制:問(wèn)題與對(duì)策[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2001年06期

4 王俊豪;中英電信產(chǎn)業(yè)政府管制體制改革比較[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);1998年08期

5 王廷惠;自然壟斷邊界變化與政府管制的調(diào)整[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2002年11期

6 于良春;論自然壟斷與自然壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)的政府規(guī)制[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年02期

7 于良春,于華陽(yáng);自然壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)壟斷的“自然性”探析[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年11期

8 陳小洪;中國(guó)電信業(yè):政策、產(chǎn)業(yè)組織的變化及若干建議[J];管理世界;1999年01期

9 伍世安,王萬(wàn)山;自然壟斷產(chǎn)品的價(jià)格形成與優(yōu)化分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)經(jīng)緯;2004年01期

10 宋立;現(xiàn)代西方規(guī)制理論及其演進(jìn)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);1997年09期

，

本文編號(hào)：2379420