【摘要】：政治經(jīng)濟學關(guān)于資本主義生產(chǎn)方式的邏輯體系的各個概念范疇都是對資本主義生產(chǎn)方式的發(fā)生、發(fā)展的主觀反映。因此,將作為《資本論》邏輯起點的商品僅僅看作是資本主義的商品,必然無法清楚地說明資本主義生產(chǎn)方式的來龍去脈,《資本論》這一光輝的巨著也將變成一個不完備的體系;將作為《資本論》邏輯起點的商品歸于商品一般,會否定范疇是變化和運動的屬性;而將作為《資本論》邏輯起點的商品僅僅看作是資本主義以前的簡單商品,會弱化或忽視從抽象上升到具體的邏輯的重要性。正確的理解應該是,作為《資本論》邏輯起點的商品,既可看成是歷史上存在的作為資本主義歷史前提的簡單商品,又可看作是資本主義商品舍棄了資本主義關(guān)系的一般商品,這既是唯物史觀的要求,也是辯證法的應用。
[Abstract]:Every concept category of the logical system of political economy on capitalist production mode is a subjective reflection of the occurrence and development of capitalist mode of production. Therefore, the commodities that serve as the logical starting point of Capital are only regarded as the commodities of capitalism. Inevitably, it is impossible to clearly explain the origin of the capitalist mode of production, and this glorious masterpiece, Capital, will also become an incomplete system; the commodities that serve as the logical starting point of Capital will be attributed to commodities in general. To deny that category is the attribute of change and movement, and to regard the commodity as the starting point of Capital as a simple commodity before capitalism weakens or neglects the importance of rising from abstract to concrete logic. The correct understanding should be that commodities, as the logical starting point of Capital, can be regarded as a simple commodity that existed in history as the historical premise of capitalism, and as a general commodity in which capitalist goods have abandoned the capitalist relationship. This is not only the requirement of historical materialism, but also the application of dialectics.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學經(jīng)濟學院;
【分類號】：F014.3
，

本文編號：2283797