【摘要】：加州學(xué)派關(guān)注近代早期歐洲和明清時(shí)期中國的對(duì)比,關(guān)注中國江南和西歐重點(diǎn)地區(qū)的對(duì)比,其研究視角和研究方法給人耳目一新的感覺,但他們的純經(jīng)濟(jì)化的數(shù)據(jù)分析和對(duì)外生因素的關(guān)注卻招致了很多的批評(píng)和質(zhì)疑。這些批評(píng)的中心內(nèi)容大多是質(zhì)疑他們對(duì)于制度、結(jié)構(gòu)等內(nèi)在因素的忽視。不過,學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)"加州學(xué)派"的研究主要集中于學(xué)派內(nèi)主要代表人物的重要著作,很少直接涉及對(duì)整個(gè)學(xué)派的研究。同時(shí),學(xué)派內(nèi)部的學(xué)者的研究取向各有自己的側(cè)重點(diǎn),研究方法和研究風(fēng)格各有千秋,即使對(duì)同一問題的看法也是不同的。
[Abstract]:The California School paid close attention to the contrast between the early modern Europe and China during the Ming and Qing dynasties, and to the comparison between the south of the Yangtze River and the key areas of Western Europe. However, their purely economic data analysis and the attention of external factors have attracted a lot of criticism and doubt. The central content of these criticisms is to question their neglect of internal factors such as institution and structure. However, the study of California School mainly focuses on the important works of the main representatives of the school, and rarely directly involves the study of the whole school. At the same time, scholars in the school have their own research orientation, research methods and research styles are different, even on the same issue is different.
【作者單位】： 廈門大學(xué)歷史系;
【分類號(hào)】：F091.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 榮明杰;;西方世界的興起及啟示[J];當(dāng)代教育理論與實(shí)踐;2013年12期

，

本文編號(hào)：2131734