本文選題：經(jīng)濟(jì)哲學(xué) + 市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)�。� 參考：《武漢科技大學(xué)》2003年碩士論文

【摘要】： 縱觀西方經(jīng)濟(jì)哲學(xué)和科技哲學(xué)發(fā)展史，我們不難發(fā)現(xiàn)，經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的發(fā)展從來(lái)都離不開(kāi)經(jīng)濟(jì)哲學(xué)思想的指導(dǎo)，而經(jīng)濟(jì)哲學(xué)的發(fā)展又離不開(kāi)科技哲學(xué)思想發(fā)展的影響。本文試圖運(yùn)用經(jīng)濟(jì)哲學(xué)觀點(diǎn)，從馬克思社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)五形態(tài)及三形態(tài)理論出發(fā)，對(duì)我國(guó)社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)進(jìn)行歷史定位。并在此基礎(chǔ)上，，對(duì)社會(huì)主義初級(jí)階段理論、社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)主體以及國(guó)有企業(yè)中的法人治理結(jié)構(gòu)等現(xiàn)實(shí)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行探討。 本文的第1章闡述經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的發(fā)展從來(lái)離不開(kāi)哲學(xué)思想的引導(dǎo)，馬克思本人就是世界公認(rèn)的將經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)和哲學(xué)互動(dòng)研究的大師，他的一生的兩大發(fā)現(xiàn)——唯物史觀和剩余價(jià)值，就是在此基礎(chǔ)上完成的。 本論文的第2章，著重闡述了科技哲學(xué)的發(fā)展對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)哲學(xué)發(fā)展的影響。筆者認(rèn)為，在新的歷史階段，堅(jiān)持和發(fā)展馬克思主義經(jīng)濟(jì)哲學(xué)思想，必須聯(lián)系西方科技哲學(xué)的研究成果及思想發(fā)展進(jìn)程，并將其應(yīng)用到一系列現(xiàn)實(shí)問(wèn)題的解決中。 論文的第3章，筆者為了說(shuō)明馬克思社會(huì)五形態(tài)和三形態(tài)理論形成的理論依據(jù)專(zhuān)門(mén)截取了封建社會(huì)這一典型歷史階段，將亞細(xì)亞和西歐兩種生產(chǎn)方式進(jìn)行歷史對(duì)比。筆者認(rèn)為，馬克思的五形態(tài)理論是從西歐生產(chǎn)方式中得出的，而亞細(xì)亞生產(chǎn)方式則是根據(jù)亞洲生產(chǎn)方式的特點(diǎn)提出的，因而，在社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)條件下，全面把握馬克思的社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)形態(tài)理論，既不能認(rèn)為社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)五形態(tài)理論是唯一正確的，也決不能輕視和誤解社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)三形態(tài)說(shuō)。在第3章的最后，筆者根據(jù)馬克思的三形態(tài)和五形態(tài)理論，認(rèn)為：社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)處于五形態(tài)理論中社會(huì)主義階段中的初級(jí)階段，和三形態(tài)理論中商品經(jīng)濟(jì)階段中的計(jì)劃經(jīng)濟(jì)向商品經(jīng)濟(jì)過(guò)渡階段及在人的發(fā)展形態(tài)上處于人對(duì)物的依賴(lài)關(guān)系向人的個(gè)性全面發(fā)展的過(guò)渡階段。 論文的第4章，筆者在前面理論問(wèn)題分析的基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)我國(guó)在當(dāng)前應(yīng)如何理解社會(huì)主義初級(jí)階段的歷史必然性，社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)主體如何在加入WTO以后調(diào)整角色以及國(guó)有企業(yè)的法人治理結(jié)構(gòu)應(yīng)如何完善的現(xiàn)實(shí)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析。
[Abstract]:Throughout the history of western economic philosophy and scientific philosophy, it is not difficult to find that the development of economics has always been inseparable from the guidance of economic philosophy, and the development of economic philosophy can not be separated from the influence of the development of philosophy of science and technology. This article attempts to use the economic philosophy point of view, from Marx's social economy five forms and three forms theory, carries on the historical localization to our country socialism market economy. On this basis, the theory of the primary stage of socialism, the main body of the socialist market and the corporate governance structure in the state-owned enterprises are discussed. The first chapter of this paper expounds that the development of economics has never been inseparable from the guidance of philosophical thought. Marx himself is recognized as the master of the interactive study of economics and philosophy in the world, and his two major discoveries in his life-historical materialism and surplus value. It is on this basis that the completion. The second chapter of this paper focuses on the impact of the development of philosophy of science and technology on the development of economic philosophy. The author believes that in the new historical stage, to adhere to and develop Marxist economic philosophy, we must link with the research results and ideological development process of western philosophy of science and technology, and apply it to the solution of a series of practical problems. In chapter 3, in order to explain the theoretical basis of Marx's theory of five forms and three forms of society, the author specifically intercepts the typical historical stage of feudal society, and compares the two modes of production in Asia and Western Europe. The author believes that Marx's theory of five forms was derived from the mode of production in Western Europe, while the Asian mode of production was put forward according to the characteristics of the Asian mode of production. Therefore, under the conditions of the socialist market economy, To grasp Marx's theory of social and economic form in an all-round way, we can neither think that the theory of the five forms of social economy is the only correct one, nor should we belittle and misunderstand the theory of the three forms of social economy. At the end of chapter 3, according to Marx's theory of three forms and five forms, the author thinks that the socialist market economy is in the primary stage of the socialist stage in the theory of five forms. And the transition stage from planned economy to commodity economy in the stage of commodity economy in the theory of three forms, and the transition stage in the form of human development from the dependence of man on things to the all-round development of individual character. Chapter 4, on the basis of the analysis of the previous theoretical problems, discusses how to understand the historical inevitability of the primary stage of socialism in our country. How to adjust the role of the main body of socialist market after China's entry into WTO and how to perfect the corporate governance structure of state-owned enterprises are analyzed.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2003
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F0-02

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊家祚;我國(guó)理論界關(guān)于經(jīng)濟(jì)哲學(xué)討論綜述[J];國(guó)際關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年04期

2 陳志生;經(jīng)濟(jì)哲學(xué)與科學(xué)哲學(xué)[J];合肥聯(lián)合大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

3 丁文鋒;對(duì)中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論的反思[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家;1997年03期

4 陳章亮;論哲學(xué)與經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)結(jié)盟的重大意義[J];毛澤東鄧小平理論研究;1998年05期

5 黃家瑤;論科學(xué)哲學(xué)對(duì)西方經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的影響[J];寧波大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文科學(xué)版);2001年02期

6 吳德勤;經(jīng)濟(jì)哲學(xué)何以可能[J];社會(huì)科學(xué);2001年09期

7 楊玉成,李丹;后現(xiàn)代主義對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論的挑戰(zhàn)及其有效性質(zhì)疑[J];中共福建省委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2002年01期

8 劉澄;經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析范式的轉(zhuǎn)換與經(jīng)濟(jì)哲學(xué)發(fā)展[J];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

9 曾祥云;經(jīng)濟(jì)哲學(xué):哲學(xué)與經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的聯(lián)盟——“全國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)哲學(xué)高級(jí)研討會(huì)”綜述[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);1998年05期

10 張建偉;西方經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的貧困與中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)哲學(xué)建設(shè)[J];中州學(xué)刊;1998年06期

本文編號(hào)：1917409