本文選題：具體 + 總體　； 參考：《南開學報(哲學社會科學版)》2016年03期

【摘要】：馬克思在"思維"與"現(xiàn)實"的非對稱性關系中所區(qū)分的"思維的具體"與"現(xiàn)實的具體",是《資本論》得以展開的坐標;以"勞動一般"為表征的"思維"與"現(xiàn)實"之間的直接同一性,則是《資本論》得以展開的理論前提;在此前提下如何構造"資本"這個"具體的總體",則構成了馬克思《資本論》的主題。由于馬克思《資本論》以一個十分發(fā)達的社會總體作為現(xiàn)實前提,以"抽象的范疇"與"真實的現(xiàn)實"之間的同一性作為理論前提,其構造出來的"具體的總體"雖然具有典范的意義,但決不能混淆于"現(xiàn)實的具體"并將其非法擴張;同時,由于馬克思所構造的"具體的總體"是在物質生產領域中展開的,而經濟生活與政治生活之間存在著根本的差異,因此,《資本論》也不能直接被轉譯為"正義論"。
[Abstract]:Marx's distinction between "concrete thinking" and "reality" in the asymmetric relationship between "thinking" and "reality" is the coordinate of "Capital". The direct identity between "thinking" and "reality", characterized by "labor in general", is the theoretical premise of Capital. Under this premise, how to construct the "capital", the "concrete collectivity", constitutes the theme of Marx's "Capital". Because Marx's "Capital" takes a very developed society as its realistic premise and the identity between "abstract category" and "real reality" as its theoretical premise, The "concrete collectivity" constructed by Marx is of exemplary significance, but it must not be confused with the "concrete reality" and unlawfully expand it; at the same time, since the "concrete collectivity" constructed by Marx is carried out in the field of material production, However, there is a fundamental difference between economic life and political life. Therefore, Capital cannot be translated directly into Justice.
【作者單位】： 南開大學哲學院;
【分類號】：F091.91

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 王時中;;論柄谷行人跨越性批判的非對稱性立場[J];江海學刊;2015年02期

【共引文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 王時中;;從“具體”到“總體”——重評《資本論》的理論進路[J];南開學報(哲學社會科學版);2016年03期

，

本文編號：1837708