發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-02 04:43

  本文選題：產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)演進(jìn) + 產(chǎn)值�。� 參考：《重慶大學(xué)》2003年碩士論文

【摘要】： 對產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)研究雖然沒有西方經(jīng)濟(jì)理論研究歷史久遠(yuǎn)，但由于它對經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展有著重要意義，所以從上個(gè)世紀(jì)以來許多著名的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家都致力于產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的研究，但這些研究中大多數(shù)研究都是通過對經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展中產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)演變的現(xiàn)象加以歸納，總結(jié)從而得出產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)演進(jìn)規(guī)律，這種方法固然使理論與實(shí)際能很好的吻合，但只是對現(xiàn)象的簡單加工，并沒有從深層次去揭示產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)演進(jìn)的內(nèi)在規(guī)律，這也不利于產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)理論進(jìn)一步深化和發(fā)展。 表征產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)指標(biāo)很多，但產(chǎn)值比重指標(biāo)最具代表性，因此本文中將采用產(chǎn)值比重作為產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的指標(biāo)，于是產(chǎn)值的變化便成為產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變遷的關(guān)鍵，產(chǎn)值增長率相對較快的部門或產(chǎn)業(yè)、產(chǎn)值比重自然會上升。從長遠(yuǎn)的角度來看，，大多數(shù)部門終將處于消費(fèi)者主權(quán)的時(shí)期，所以產(chǎn)值主要由消費(fèi)者偏好、該產(chǎn)業(yè)的必須消費(fèi)額占收入比重等市場需求因素決定。在短期和一般長期內(nèi)，消費(fèi)者偏好，和該產(chǎn)業(yè)必須消費(fèi)額占收入比重可以認(rèn)為是恒量，則此時(shí)，產(chǎn)值的變動(dòng)主要取決于要素的邊際生產(chǎn)力的變化。本文首先依據(jù)經(jīng)濟(jì)控制論的原理分別建立于“長遠(yuǎn)時(shí)間內(nèi)”、“短期”和“長期”的產(chǎn)值時(shí)間序列函數(shù)，然后得出產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的時(shí)間序列函數(shù)，分析產(chǎn)值調(diào)整的具體過程，并對庫茲涅茨的結(jié)論進(jìn)行了一般性的解釋。從中得出結(jié)論：站在長遠(yuǎn)的角度看，應(yīng)該認(rèn)為市場中消費(fèi)者偏好的改變導(dǎo)致需求結(jié)構(gòu)改變是產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變化的一個(gè)動(dòng)力來源。但市場經(jīng)濟(jì)體制下，行業(yè)產(chǎn)量調(diào)整，產(chǎn)值的變化實(shí)質(zhì)上是行業(yè)內(nèi)要素調(diào)整的結(jié)果，或者說是要素流動(dòng)的結(jié)果。要素經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)應(yīng)是產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)理論的核心內(nèi)容。所以可以認(rèn)為經(jīng)濟(jì)體內(nèi)的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的演進(jìn)，實(shí)質(zhì)上是產(chǎn)業(yè)間要素流動(dòng)的一種外在經(jīng)濟(jì)表現(xiàn)，產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的演進(jìn)的過程就是要素流動(dòng)的過程。根本的動(dòng)力是產(chǎn)業(yè)的市場需求結(jié)構(gòu)的變動(dòng)，直接的動(dòng)力是要素的邊際生產(chǎn)力的變動(dòng)。 要素流動(dòng)是一個(gè)極其復(fù)雜的過程。本文中借用了人力資本、物質(zhì)資本和金融資本的概念。筆者認(rèn)為三者中，只有人力資本和物質(zhì)資本才是直接的生產(chǎn)要素，金融資本并非是直接生產(chǎn)要素。金融資本是通過轉(zhuǎn)化為人力資本或物質(zhì)資本然后參與生產(chǎn)過程中。在此認(rèn)識的基礎(chǔ)上筆者進(jìn)一步論證了這三者本質(zhì)上都是人類勞動(dòng)的凝結(jié)，只是存在形式和參與生產(chǎn)的方式不同。所以文中分別對人力資本和物質(zhì)資本流動(dòng)的影響因素和金融資本的支持因素作了逐一分析，并結(jié)合國際上其它國家的經(jīng)驗(yàn)，得出一些啟示以促進(jìn)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的合理發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Although the study of industrial structure is not as long as that of western economic theory, but because of its great significance to economic development, many famous economists have devoted themselves to the study of industrial structure since the last century. However, most of these studies are through the economic development of the industrial structure of the evolution of the phenomenon summarized, summed up to obtain the evolution of industrial structure, this method certainly makes the theory and practice can be very good agreement. However, the simple processing of the phenomenon does not reveal the inherent law of the evolution of industrial structure from a deep level, which is not conducive to the further deepening and development of the theory of industrial structure. There are many indicators to characterize the industrial structure, but the proportion of output value is the most representative. Therefore, the proportion of output value is used as the index of industrial structure in this paper, so the change of output value becomes the key to the change of industrial structure. The growth rate of output value is relatively fast in departments or industries, the proportion of output value will naturally rise. In the long run, most sectors will eventually be in the period of consumer sovereignty, so the output value is mainly determined by consumer preferences, the industry must consume the proportion of income and other market demand factors. In the short and general long term, consumer preference and the proportion of consumption to income can be regarded as constant, then the change of output value mainly depends on the change of marginal productivity of factors. Based on the principle of economic cybernetics, this paper first establishes the time series function of output value in "long time", "short term" and "long term", then obtains the time series function of industrial structure and analyzes the concrete process of output value adjustment. A general explanation of Kuznets' conclusion is given. From the conclusion: in the long run, it should be considered that the change of consumer preference in the market leads to the change of demand structure, which is a driving force for the change of industrial structure. However, under the market economy system, the change of industry output and output value is essentially the result of the adjustment of factors within the industry, or the result of factor flow. Factor economics should be the core content of industrial structure theory. Therefore, it can be considered that the evolution of industrial structure in an economy is essentially an external economic performance of the flow of elements between industries, and the process of evolution of industrial structure is the process of the flow of elements. The fundamental motive force is the change of the market demand structure of the industry, and the direct power is the change of the marginal productivity of the factor. Factor flow is an extremely complex process. This article borrows the human capital, the material capital and the financial capital concept. The author thinks that only human capital and material capital are the direct factors of production and financial capital is not the direct factor of production. Financial capital is transformed into human or material capital and then participate in the production process. On the basis of this understanding, the author further demonstrates that the three are essentially the condensation of human labor, but the forms of existence and the ways of participating in production are different. So this paper analyzes the influencing factors of human capital and material capital flow and the supporting factors of financial capital one by one. Combined with the experience of other countries in the world, some enlightenments are obtained to promote the rational development of industrial structure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2003
【分類號】：F062.9

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 邵毅;;我國發(fā)展方式轉(zhuǎn)變對地勘單位改革的影響分析[J];中國礦業(yè);2012年04期

2 邵毅;;我國發(fā)展方式轉(zhuǎn)變倒逼地勘單位進(jìn)入改革拐點(diǎn)[J];中國國土資源經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年07期

本文編號：1832407