論普遍達爾文主義在演化經(jīng)濟學(xué)領(lǐng)域作為研究綱領(lǐng)的應(yīng)用合法性問題
發(fā)布時間:2018-04-01 22:04
本文選題:普遍達爾文主義 切入點:社會-經(jīng)濟演化 出處:《自然辯證法研究》2017年05期
【摘要】:霍奇遜和納森等經(jīng)濟學(xué)家致力于整合演化經(jīng)濟學(xué)的基礎(chǔ)理論,試圖將普遍達爾文主義發(fā)展成為演化經(jīng)濟學(xué)的統(tǒng)一研究綱領(lǐng)。不過,普遍達爾文主義在演化經(jīng)濟學(xué)理論體系中使用的合法性尚存有爭議,亟需厘清。作為宏觀啟發(fā)觀念的普遍達爾文主義不是具體的科學(xué)理論,不能直接解釋經(jīng)濟演化現(xiàn)象。按照科學(xué)理論語義觀,如果被理解為范·弗拉森所言的“模型簇”,普遍達爾文主義就可以涵蓋多種理論類型;而特定理論的任務(wù)就在于連接普遍達爾文主義與具體經(jīng)驗現(xiàn)象。因此,必須為普遍達爾文主義解釋社會-經(jīng)濟演化現(xiàn)象給出所需的特定理論,而選擇型理論則是當(dāng)前最為適合的一種理論。
[Abstract]:Economists such as Hodgson and Nathan are committed to integrating the basic theories of evolutionary economics and trying to develop universal Darwinism into a unified research framework for evolutionary economics. The legitimacy of the use of universal Darwinism in the theoretical system of evolutionary economics is still controversial and needs to be clarified. As a macroscopic heuristic concept, universal Darwinism is not a specific scientific theory. The phenomenon of economic evolution can not be explained directly. According to the semantic view of scientific theory, if it is understood as "model cluster" by Van Fraxen, universal Darwinism can cover a variety of theoretical types. The task of a particular theory is to link universal Darwinism with concrete empirical phenomena. The selective theory is the most suitable theory at present.
,
本文編號:1697477
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/jingjililun/1697477.html
最近更新
教材專著