本文關(guān)鍵詞： 新自由主義 實(shí)踐 本質(zhì) 后果 啟示　出處：《南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：新自由主義以自由放任為原則,強(qiáng)調(diào)私有制為基礎(chǔ)的市場(chǎng)機(jī)制對(duì)資源配置的自發(fā)作用,反對(duì)政府對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)的過多干預(yù),它是一種為資本主義制度辯護(hù)的經(jīng)濟(jì)思潮。20世紀(jì)70年代以后,伴隨著政府對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)干預(yù)政策的失效,凱恩斯主義受到懷疑和攻擊,新自由主義再度勃興,并取代凱恩斯主義成為西方主流經(jīng)濟(jì)思潮。1979年,新自由主義的實(shí)踐首先從英美兩國(guó)開始,1979年,“華盛頓共識(shí)”的出臺(tái)是新自由主義以政策范式的形式開始在拉美發(fā)展中國(guó)家和東歐轉(zhuǎn)軌國(guó)家推行的標(biāo)志�？v觀新自由主義在不同國(guó)家的盛行,不可否認(rèn)取得了一定得積極效果,但透過現(xiàn)象看本質(zhì),新自由主義的盛行更深層次的意義是國(guó)際壟斷資本主義全球擴(kuò)張的戰(zhàn)略布局,無法脫離資本主義剝削的本質(zhì),所以新自由主義的盛行更多的是對(duì)發(fā)展中國(guó)家以及世界經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展所產(chǎn)生的消極影響。 本文以馬克思主義的辨證唯物主義和歷史唯物主義為指導(dǎo),利用馬克思主義政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)壟斷資本主義理論、市場(chǎng)理論、收入分配理論等剖析新自由主義實(shí)踐及其帶來的后果,進(jìn)而進(jìn)一步揭示新自由主義引起世界范圍內(nèi)經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī)的內(nèi)在機(jī)理,并結(jié)合“北京共識(shí)”討論了對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示。第一章導(dǎo)論部分主要闡述了本文選題的背景和意義、研究思路以及論文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)。面對(duì)2008年下半年爆發(fā)的全球性的金融和經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī),筆者結(jié)合近些年盛極一時(shí)的新自由主義思潮,經(jīng)過簡(jiǎn)單論證后認(rèn)為新自由主義與經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī)之間存在一定的關(guān)系,需要運(yùn)用多種方法加以深入的探討。第二章對(duì)自由主義經(jīng)濟(jì)思想加以梳理,逐一評(píng)述了古典自由主義經(jīng)濟(jì)思想、庸俗經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的自由主義思想、新古典學(xué)派的經(jīng)濟(jì)自由主義思想,以此來深入了解自由主義的理論淵源并理解新自由主義的思想來源。同時(shí)結(jié)合理論淵源對(duì)新自由主義的理論框架進(jìn)行了分析。第三章重點(diǎn)對(duì)新自由主義的實(shí)踐進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析研究,分別論述了新自由主義在英美發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家、拉美國(guó)家、俄羅斯為代表的東歐國(guó)家以及東南亞國(guó)家的實(shí)踐和后果,并利用歸納演繹的方法得出了新自由主義全球化的實(shí)質(zhì)與影響。在前面章節(jié)的鋪墊之上,第四章運(yùn)用馬克思主義的立場(chǎng)、觀點(diǎn)、方法對(duì)新自由主義進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)分析,對(duì)比研究了新自由主義與馬克思主義,形成了對(duì)新自由主義本質(zhì)的初步認(rèn)識(shí)。第五章主要針對(duì)新自由主義在發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家和發(fā)展中國(guó)家實(shí)踐所造成的后果,結(jié)合第四章,提出了新自由主義引起經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī)的內(nèi)在機(jī)理。最后一章結(jié)合“北京共識(shí)”提出的“中國(guó)模式”針對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)實(shí)際得出新自由主義實(shí)踐后果對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示。
[Abstract]:Neoliberalism, based on laissez-faire, emphasizes the spontaneous effect of private ownership based market mechanism on resource allocation and opposes excessive government intervention in economic activities. It was an economic trend of thought that defended the capitalist system. After 70s, with the failure of the government's policy of economic intervention, Keynesianism came under suspicion and attack, and neoliberalism flourished again. And replaced Keynesianism as the mainstream economic trend in the West. In 1979, The practice of neoliberalism began in the United States and the United States. In 1979, the "Washington consensus" was the symbol of neoliberalism being implemented in the form of policy paradigm in the developing countries of Latin America and the countries in transition in Eastern Europe. The prevalence of idealism in different countries, There is no denying that some positive results have been achieved, but through the phenomenon to see the essence, the deeper significance of the prevalence of neoliberalism is the strategic layout of the global expansion of international monopoly capitalism, which cannot be separated from the essence of capitalist exploitation. So the prevalence of neoliberalism is more of a negative impact on the development of developing countries and the world economy. Under the guidance of Marxist dialectical materialism and historical materialism, this paper analyzes the practice of neoliberalism and its consequences by using Marxist political economics monopoly capitalism theory, market theory, income distribution theory, etc. Then it further reveals the inner mechanism of the economic crisis in the world caused by neoliberalism, and discusses the enlightenment to our country with the "Beijing consensus". The first chapter introduces the background and significance of this thesis. In the face of the global financial and economic crisis that broke out in the second half of 2008, the author combines the neoliberal trend of thought which is the most popular in recent years. After simple argumentation, it is concluded that there is a certain relationship between neoliberalism and economic crisis, which needs to be discussed in depth by various methods. Chapter two combs the economic thought of liberalism. The economic thoughts of classical liberalism, vulgar economics, neo-classical school of thought of economic liberalism are reviewed one by one. In order to understand the theoretical origin of liberalism and understand the ideological source of neoliberalism, the theoretical framework of neoliberalism is analyzed. Chapter three focuses on the practice of neoliberalism. Through empirical analysis, The paper discusses the practice and consequences of neoliberalism in the developed countries of the United States and the United States, the Latin American countries, the Eastern European countries represented by Russia, and the Southeast Asian countries. The essence and influence of neoliberal globalization are obtained by means of inductive and deductive methods. On the basis of the preceding chapters, Chapter 4th makes systematic analysis of neoliberalism by means of Marxist standpoint, viewpoint and method. A comparative study of neoliberalism and Marxism has formed a preliminary understanding of the essence of neoliberalism. Chapter 5th focuses on the consequences of neoliberalism in practice in developed and developing countries, combined with Chapter 4th. This paper puts forward the internal mechanism of the economic crisis caused by neoliberalism. The last chapter combines the "Chinese model" put forward by the "Beijing consensus" to draw inspiration from the practical consequences of neoliberalism in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：F091.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曹東勃;秦茗;;金融創(chuàng)新與技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的耦合——兼論金融危機(jī)的深層根源[J];財(cái)經(jīng)科學(xué);2009年01期

2 劉小波;侯鑫;;經(jīng)濟(jì)自由主義和國(guó)家干預(yù)主義的演進(jìn)及其啟示[J];消費(fèi)導(dǎo)刊;2009年02期

3 鄒曉青;;對(duì)新自由主義經(jīng)濟(jì)思潮的反思[J];貴州教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年11期

4 江匯;;美式自由資本主義風(fēng)雨飄搖[J];決策與信息;2008年11期

5 張岱年;文化傳統(tǒng)和綜合創(chuàng)新[J];江海學(xué)刊;2003年05期

6 曾國(guó)安;20世紀(jì)80、90年代世界各國(guó)居民收入差距的比較[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2002年01期

7 何東;;金融危機(jī)后的貨幣政策操作——東亞國(guó)家的經(jīng)驗(yàn)及啟示[J];金融研究;2007年05期

8 藍(lán)慶新;;新自由主義的失敗與美國(guó)金融危機(jī)的警示[J];南京社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年01期

9 譚揚(yáng)芳;;新自由主義的困境與馬克思的觀點(diǎn)——當(dāng)前國(guó)際金融危機(jī)根源探析[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期

10 程恩富,王中保;經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化與新自由主義的范式危機(jī)[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)研究;2005年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張飛岸;新自由主義與資本主義危機(jī)[D];中央民族大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1538692