本文關(guān)鍵詞： 哈耶克 福利國家 社會保障　出處：《華中科技大學(xué)》2004年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：哈耶克的政治理念充滿了鮮明的自由秩序特征 其經(jīng)濟(jì)主張也以倡導(dǎo)市 場競爭而見長 哈耶克的社會福利思想由此孕育而生 本文正是在介紹哈耶 克政治經(jīng)濟(jì)思想的基礎(chǔ)之上 闡述了他對西方社會福利制度的批判態(tài)度與建 構(gòu)主張 第一部分從三個方面論述了哈耶克的政治理念:一是政府與權(quán)力的主張 二是自由與責(zé)任的理解 三是反對平均主義的思想 哈耶克的經(jīng)濟(jì)主張主要 有兩個方面 一是反對經(jīng)濟(jì)計劃與分配正義 二是倡導(dǎo)經(jīng)濟(jì)自由與市場競爭 第二部分講述了哈耶克對西方國家社會福利制度的批判態(tài)度 首先 哈耶 克從三方面對福利國家進(jìn)行了批判 一是福利國家存在三大錯誤動機(jī) 二是 福利國家威脅自由原則 三是福利國家縱容收入保障 其次 哈耶克對西方 社會保障制度提出了批評 這種批評主要是基于收入再分配與國家壟斷存在 不合理性以及社會保險制度發(fā)生異化來進(jìn)行的 第三部分講述了哈耶克對西方國家社會福利制度的建構(gòu)主張 首先 哈耶 克分析了貧困問題的產(chǎn)生原因及解決方法 其次 他論證了社會保障制度存 在的合理性 并且主張實行最低收入保障制度 最后 哈耶克從三方面提出 了現(xiàn)有社會保障制度的改革策略 一是避免政府壟斷 倡導(dǎo)市場競爭 二是 避免中央集權(quán) 倡導(dǎo)地方分權(quán) 三是發(fā)揮個人主導(dǎo)作用 最后一部分對哈耶克的社會福利思想進(jìn)行評價 首先點(diǎn)明了哈耶克社會福 利思想對西方社會保障實踐的影響 然后提出了福利經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家巴爾對哈耶克 思想的挑戰(zhàn) 闡述兩人在福利國家及社會保險思想上的巨大分歧 最后將包 括哈耶克新保守主義福利思想在內(nèi)的二十世紀(jì)三大福利思潮進(jìn)行了對比 指 出三者在社會福利基本原則及制度設(shè)計上的差異 本文結(jié)尾對哈耶克學(xué)術(shù)思 想進(jìn)行了總結(jié)
[Abstract]:Hayek's political ideas are full of distinct liberal order characteristics, and his economic propositions also advocate the market. The social welfare thought of Hayek is born out of this. This article is just to introduce Haye. On the basis of his political and economic thought, he expounds his critical attitude and construction to the western social welfare system. Construction claim The first part discusses Hayek's political idea from three aspects: first, the proposition of government and power. Second, the understanding of freedom and responsibility. Third, the thought of opposing egalitarianism. Hayek's economic proposition is the main one. There are two aspects: opposing economic planning and distributing justice. Second, advocating economic freedom and market competition. The second part describes Hayek's critical attitude towards the social welfare system of western countries. First, Hayes. He criticizes the welfare state from three aspects. The first is that there are three wrong motives in welfare state. Welfare State threatens Freedom the third is that the Welfare State connives at income security next to Hayek to the West The criticism of the social security system is mainly based on income redistribution and the existence of state monopolies. Irrationality and alienation of the social security system The third part describes Hayek's construction of social welfare system in western countries. First, Hayes. He analyzed the causes and solutions of the poverty problem. Secondly, he demonstrated the existence of the social security system. On the rationality of the minimum income guarantee system and on the implementation of the minimum income guarantee system finally Hayek put forward from three aspects The reform strategy of the existing social security system is to avoid government monopoly and advocate market competition. Avoiding centralization of power and advocating decentralization the third is to give play to the individual leading role The last part evaluates Hayek's social welfare thought. First, it points out Hayek's social welfare. The influence of the thought of benefit on the practice of Social Security in the West and then put forward the welfare economist Barr Hayek The challenge of thinking expound that the two men's huge differences in thinking about the welfare state and social security will end up in In 20th century, three welfare thoughts, including Hayek's neo-conservative welfare thought, were compared and pointed out. The difference between the three in the basic principles of social welfare and the design of the system. At the end of this paper, I give Hayek academic thoughts. Wanted to sum up.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2004
【分類號】：F061.4

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李偉蘭;哈耶克內(nèi)在規(guī)則理論的研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2008年

2 張秀金;公民資格與社會權(quán)利：馬歇爾福利思想研究[D];華東理工大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1490121