本文關(guān)鍵詞： 馬克思生態(tài)思想 民族旅游 生態(tài)危機(jī)　出處：《廣西民族研究》2017年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：馬克思有無(wú)生態(tài)思想已在中外學(xué)界掀起激烈論爭(zhēng),國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)者基本上對(duì)馬克思的生態(tài)思想持肯定態(tài)度。人與自然辯證統(tǒng)一、人與自然對(duì)立導(dǎo)致生態(tài)異化,生態(tài)異化最終反映在生態(tài)危機(jī)上是其生態(tài)思想的基本意蘊(yùn)。民族旅游在馬克思生態(tài)思想視域下存在對(duì)民族旅游內(nèi)涵認(rèn)識(shí)模糊、對(duì)民族旅游活動(dòng)潛藏生態(tài)危機(jī)認(rèn)識(shí)不足兩大誤區(qū)。發(fā)展民族旅游要根植文化與自然的互動(dòng)適應(yīng)意識(shí),制定民族旅游生態(tài)補(bǔ)償相關(guān)法規(guī)。
[Abstract]:Whether Marx has ecological thought has aroused fierce debate in Chinese and foreign academic circles. Domestic scholars basically hold positive attitude to Marx's ecological thought. Man and nature are dialectically unified, and the antagonism between man and nature leads to ecological alienation. Ecological alienation is ultimately reflected in the ecological crisis is the basic meaning of its ecological thought, and there is a vague understanding of the connotation of ethnic tourism in the field of Marx's ecological thought. There are two misunderstandings about the latent ecological crisis of the national tourism activities. To develop the national tourism, we should plant the interactive adaptation consciousness between culture and nature, and formulate the relevant laws and regulations on the ecological compensation of national tourism.
【作者單位】： 中央民族大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;
【基金】：中央民族大學(xué)一流大學(xué)一流學(xué)科經(jīng)費(fèi)資助項(xiàng)目“貴州省民族旅游生態(tài)補(bǔ)償法制保障研究”(10301-0170040601-029)
【分類號(hào)】：F091.91;F205;F592.7
【正文快照】： 一、馬克思生態(tài)思想論爭(zhēng)馬克思有無(wú)生態(tài)思想已在中外掀起激烈論爭(zhēng)。就馬克思的自然觀是否具有生態(tài)思想、其生態(tài)思想是否具有生態(tài)文明建設(shè)的理論視域以及學(xué)科性是中外學(xué)術(shù)界爭(zhēng)論最激烈的話題之一。這些爭(zhēng)論包括否定說(shuō)、二分說(shuō)、指責(zé)詰難說(shuō)以及肯定說(shuō)。[1]隨著批判與擁護(hù)雙方論，

本文編號(hào)：1457397