【摘要】：隨著京杭大運(yùn)河于2014年6月成功入選世界文化遺產(chǎn)名錄,運(yùn)河沿線豐富的景觀資源越來越受到人們的重視,城市運(yùn)河公園作為運(yùn)河景觀的主要代表類型,在承擔(dān)著城市公園的基礎(chǔ)使用功能的同時(shí),立足于運(yùn)河獨(dú)特的生態(tài)景觀資源和歷史文化資源。開展城市運(yùn)河公園的研究,對(duì)于運(yùn)河生態(tài)環(huán)境資源的保護(hù)和運(yùn)河文化的傳承有著積極的作用。本文以京杭大運(yùn)河北京通州段的通州運(yùn)河公園和大運(yùn)河森林公園為例,對(duì)其使用狀況進(jìn)行綜合評(píng)價(jià)研究,對(duì)北京運(yùn)河公園以及運(yùn)河沿線其他公園的規(guī)劃建設(shè)、景觀提升以及發(fā)展研究,具有一定參考和指導(dǎo)價(jià)值。(1)本文通過進(jìn)行文檔文獻(xiàn)閱讀和對(duì)北京運(yùn)河公園進(jìn)行實(shí)地調(diào)研及人物訪談的形式,對(duì)北京運(yùn)河公園進(jìn)行定性分析研究,從而較為構(gòu)建出北京運(yùn)河公園的使用狀況評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系,以北京運(yùn)河公園使用狀況綜合評(píng)價(jià)為目標(biāo),選取歷史文化要素、生態(tài)景觀要素、社會(huì)管理要素、游憩交通要素為一級(jí)指標(biāo),以地域文化獨(dú)特性、文化內(nèi)涵體現(xiàn)性、科普教育豐富度等十五個(gè)指標(biāo)為二級(jí)指標(biāo),構(gòu)建了北京運(yùn)河公園使用狀況評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系。(2)通過向城市規(guī)劃、景觀生態(tài)學(xué)等專家發(fā)放征詢問卷的方式,對(duì)專家的打分結(jié)果運(yùn)用層次分析法進(jìn)行數(shù)據(jù)分析,得到各個(gè)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)的判斷矩陣,從而計(jì)算出各個(gè)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)間的相對(duì)重要程度排序,即權(quán)重值,要素層各評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)的相對(duì)重要程度排序?yàn)樯鷳B(tài)景觀要素(0.523) 游憩交通要素(0.299) 歷史文化要素(0.121) 社會(huì)管理要素(0.0565);因子層各評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)的相對(duì)重要程度排序?yàn)樗w視覺印象(0.2737) 外部交通可達(dá)性(0.1715) 景觀層次美感度(0.1566) 內(nèi)部交通便捷性(0.0775) 文化內(nèi)涵體現(xiàn)性(0.0726) 植物種類豐富性(0.0633) 地域文化特性(0.0363) 空間布局合理性(0.0347) ＞公共服務(wù)設(shè)施完善度(0.0328) ＞空氣環(huán)境質(zhì)量(0.0296) 游憩舒適性(0.0157) 治安管理狀況(0.0134) 科普教育豐富性(0.0121) 公園衛(wèi)生條件(0.0073) 設(shè)施養(yǎng)護(hù)管理(0.003)。(3)運(yùn)用問卷調(diào)查的方式,對(duì)通州運(yùn)河公園和大運(yùn)河森林公園進(jìn)行使用者滿意度調(diào)查,通過對(duì)兩個(gè)公園的基礎(chǔ)信息部分問卷的分析,得出通州運(yùn)河公園和大運(yùn)河森林公園的基本現(xiàn)狀;通過對(duì)語(yǔ)義差別部分調(diào)查問卷的分析,運(yùn)用語(yǔ)義差別法進(jìn)行數(shù)據(jù)計(jì)算,得到通州運(yùn)河公園評(píng)價(jià)體系指標(biāo)的滿意度平均賦值,如地域文化特性(0.981)、文化內(nèi)涵體現(xiàn)性(0.856)、科普教育豐富性(0.904)、植物種類豐富性(1.385)、景觀層次美感度(1.572)等;得到大運(yùn)河森林公園評(píng)價(jià)體系指標(biāo)的滿意度平均賦值如地域文化特性(0.433)、文化內(nèi)涵體現(xiàn)性(0.705)、科普教育豐富性(0.891)、植物種類豐富性(1.376)、景觀層次美感度(1.547)等。(4)通過將通州運(yùn)河公園和大運(yùn)河森林公園的使用狀況評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)的權(quán)重值和滿意度平均賦值進(jìn)行綜合計(jì)算,結(jié)合層次分析法和語(yǔ)義差別法兩種量化方法,將專家的相對(duì)重要性分析和使用者的滿意度分析結(jié)果相結(jié)合,得出通州運(yùn)河公園的最終綜合評(píng)價(jià)得分D=78.333,滿意度綜合評(píng)價(jià)得分V=77.396,可知通州運(yùn)河公園使用狀況綜合評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果為較好;得出大運(yùn)河森林公園的最終綜合評(píng)價(jià)得分D=79.774,大運(yùn)河森林公園滿意度綜合評(píng)價(jià)得分V=77.796,可知大運(yùn)河森林公園使用狀況綜合評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果為較好。(5)對(duì)通州運(yùn)河公園和大運(yùn)河森林公園的各個(gè)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)滿意度進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析,得出北京運(yùn)河公園的整體評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果均較好,公園的景觀層次美感度、植物種類豐富度和游憩舒適性整體較好,公園的水體視覺印象、治安管理狀況、公園衛(wèi)生條件整體較差,而地域文化特性、文化內(nèi)涵體現(xiàn)性、科普教育豐富性等方面整體較為一般。(6)根據(jù)北京運(yùn)河公園的綜合評(píng)價(jià)及對(duì)比分析結(jié)果,對(duì)北京運(yùn)河公園的未來規(guī)劃建設(shè)給予以下優(yōu)化建議,建議應(yīng)加強(qiáng)園區(qū)治安管理,提高園內(nèi)衛(wèi)生水平;找尋通州地域文化特點(diǎn),深化運(yùn)河文化內(nèi)涵;保護(hù)運(yùn)河歷史遺跡,增加科普教育體驗(yàn)活動(dòng);整治運(yùn)河水質(zhì),凈化園內(nèi)空氣環(huán)境質(zhì)量;增強(qiáng)公園外部交通可達(dá)性,提升內(nèi)部交通便捷性;調(diào)整園區(qū)內(nèi)空間的格局,提升公園的游憩舒適度。通過本文的研究,對(duì)北京運(yùn)河公園進(jìn)行使用狀況綜合評(píng)價(jià),為運(yùn)河公園的研究提供了參考作用,從而對(duì)“后世界遺產(chǎn)時(shí)代”的運(yùn)河公園發(fā)展,起到了積極的促進(jìn)作用。
[Abstract]:With the success of the Grand Canal of the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal in the World Heritage List in June 2014, the rich landscape resources along the canal are becoming more and more important, and the city canal park is the main representative type of the canal landscape, and at the same time as the basic use function of the city park, It is based on the unique ecological landscape resources and historical and cultural resources of the canal. The research of the city canal park has a positive effect on the protection of the canal ecological environment and the inheritance of the canal culture. Taking the Tongzhou Canal Park and Grand Canal Forest Park in the Tongzhou section of Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal as an example, this paper makes a comprehensive evaluation of its use situation, and studies the planning and construction of the Beijing Canal Park and other parks along the canal, the improvement of the landscape and the development of the Grand Canal Forest Park. And has certain reference and guiding value. (1) The paper makes a qualitative analysis of the Beijing Canal Park by carrying out the document reading and the field investigation and the character interview of the Beijing Canal Park, so as to construct the evaluation index system of the use condition of the Beijing Canal Park. Taking the comprehensive evaluation of the use condition of the Beijing Canal Park as the target, selecting the historical and cultural elements, the ecological landscape elements, the social management elements and the recreation and traffic elements as the first-level indicators, and taking the fifteen indexes such as the regional cultural uniqueness, the cultural connotation and the popularization of the science popularization education as the secondary indexes, The evaluation index system of the use condition of the Beijing Canal Park is constructed. and (2) carrying out data analysis on the scoring result of the experts by using a hierarchical analysis method to obtain a judgment matrix of each evaluation index through the method of issuing a consultation questionnaire to experts such as urban planning, landscape ecology and the like, so as to calculate the relative importance degree between each evaluation index, namely, the weight value and the relative importance degree of each evaluation index of the element layer are ranked as the ecological landscape element (0.523), the recreation traffic element (0.299) historical and cultural element (0.121) social management element (0.121), and the social management element (0.0565); The relative importance of each evaluation index of the factor layer is ranked as the visual impression of the water body (0.2737), the external traffic accessibility (0.1715), the aesthetic degree of the landscape level (0.1566), the interior traffic convenience (0.0775), the cultural connotation (0.0726), the richness of the plant species (0.0633) and the spatial layout of the regional cultural characteristic (0.0363). Rationality (0.0347)> Public Service Facilities (0.0328)> Air Quality (0.0296) Recreational Comfort (0.0157) Public Security (0.0134) Public Security (0.0121) Park Sanitary Conditions (0.0073) Facilities Maintenance Management (0.003). (3) The survey of user's satisfaction is carried out in Tongzhou Canal Park and Grand Canal Forest Park by means of the questionnaire, and the basic status of Tongzhou Canal Park and Grand Canal Forest Park is obtained through the analysis of the basic information part questionnaire of two parks; By means of the analysis of the semantic difference part questionnaire, the data calculation is carried out by means of the semantic difference method, and the average value of the satisfaction degree of the index of the evaluation system of the Tongzhou Canal Park is obtained, such as the regional cultural property (0.981), the cultural connotation (0.856) and the abundance of the popular science education (0.904). The diversity of the plant species (1.385), the aesthetic degree of the landscape (1.572) and so on; the average value of the satisfaction of the evaluation system of the Grand Canal Forest Park, such as the regional cultural identity (0.433), the cultural connotation (0.705), the richness of the popular science education (0.891), the richness of the plant species (1.376), The aesthetic degree of landscape level (1.547) and so on. and (4) carrying out comprehensive calculation on the weight value and the satisfaction average value of the utilization condition evaluation index of the Tongzhou Canal Park and the Grand Canal Forest Park, and combining the two quantitative methods of the hierarchical analysis method and the semantic difference method, Based on the analysis of the relative importance of the experts and the results of the user's satisfaction analysis, the final comprehensive evaluation score of Tongzhou Canal Park is D = 78.333, and the score of satisfaction comprehensive evaluation (V = 77.396), and it can be found that the comprehensive evaluation result of the use condition of Tongzhou Canal Park is good; The final comprehensive evaluation score of the Grand Canal Forest Park is D = 79.774, and the comprehensive evaluation score of the Grand Canal Forest Park is V = 77.796. It can be found that the comprehensive evaluation result of the use condition of the Grand Canal Forest Park is good. (5) The overall evaluation results of the Grand Canal Park and the Grand Canal Forest Park are compared and analyzed, and the overall evaluation results of the Beijing Canal Park are good, the landscape level of the park is good, the diversity of the plant species and the recreation comfort are better, The visual impression of the water body in the park, the situation of public security administration, the overall poor sanitation of the park, and the characteristics of the regional culture, the cultural connotation and the richness of popular science education are more and more general. (6) According to the comprehensive evaluation of the Beijing Canal Park and the results of the comparative analysis, the following optimization suggestions are given to the future planning and construction of the Beijing Canal Park, and it is suggested that the public security management of the park should be strengthened, the health level of the park should be improved, the regional cultural characteristics of Tongzhou should be found, and the cultural connotation of the canal should be deepened; To protect the historical sites of the canal and to increase the experience of the popularization of science education; to improve the water quality of the canal, to purify the air quality in the garden, to enhance the accessibility of the outside traffic of the park, to improve the convenience of internal transportation, to adjust the pattern of the space in the park and to improve the recreation comfort of the park. Through the research of this paper, the comprehensive evaluation of the use situation of the Beijing Canal Park, which provides a reference for the research of the canal park, has played an active role in the development of the "the post-World Heritage Times" 's canal park.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽(yáng)農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：TU986.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱建新,李中秋,畢經(jīng)寶;層次分析法在環(huán)保設(shè)備故障診斷中的應(yīng)用[J];交通環(huán)保;1991年04期

2 林琳;林敏慧;;中山大學(xué)南校區(qū)校前區(qū)空間特征分析及建議[J];現(xiàn)代城市研究;2008年07期

3 李濱,張敏中;基于層次分析法的汽車系統(tǒng)分析[J];江蘇理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2000年04期

4 隋學(xué)深,高長(zhǎng)元;層次分析法在通信企業(yè)考評(píng)運(yùn)營(yíng)指標(biāo)中的應(yīng)用[J];哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2003年02期

5 呂躍進(jìn),覃菊瑩;層次分析法建模中的結(jié)構(gòu)問題[J];廣西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2003年S2期

6 魏仁干,李敏;層次分析法在汽車零部件客戶價(jià)值評(píng)估中的應(yīng)用[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2005年17期

7 孫冬,宋娜娜,劉巍;基于層次分析法解決消費(fèi)者購(gòu)車問題[J];河南機(jī)電高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

8 吳哲敏;梁海霞;;改進(jìn)的層次分析法在大學(xué)生厭學(xué)分析中的應(yīng)用[J];武漢理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(信息與管理工程版);2006年01期

9 沈劍;呂文元;;層次分析法在大型醫(yī)療設(shè)備選購(gòu)中的應(yīng)用[J];中國(guó)設(shè)備工程;2007年02期

10 楊振華;郝金鵬;;橫糊層次分析法在設(shè)備采購(gòu)中的應(yīng)用[J];河南水利與南水北調(diào);2007年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 田平;孫宏才;徐關(guān)堯;;關(guān)于AHP與ANP的比較和分析[A];決策科學(xué)與評(píng)價(jià)——中國(guó)系統(tǒng)工程學(xué)會(huì)決策科學(xué)專業(yè)委員會(huì)第八屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2009年

2 金式容;;層次分析法在評(píng)估區(qū)域可持續(xù)發(fā)展中的應(yīng)用[A];系統(tǒng)工程與可持續(xù)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略——中國(guó)系統(tǒng)工程學(xué)會(huì)第十屆年會(huì)論文集[C];1998年

3 金菊良;魏一鳴;付強(qiáng);丁晶;;計(jì)算層次分析法中排序權(quán)值的新方法[A];2001年中國(guó)管理科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2001年

4 陳會(huì)祥;黃德寅;張倩;;層次分析法在職業(yè)健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理中的應(yīng)用研究[A];風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分析和危機(jī)反應(yīng)的創(chuàng)新理論和方法——中國(guó)災(zāi)害防御協(xié)會(huì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分析專業(yè)委員會(huì)第五屆年會(huì)論文集[C];2012年

5 趙菊花;;淺談層次分析法在科技項(xiàng)目管理中的應(yīng)用[A];2012管理創(chuàng)新、智能科技與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展研討會(huì)論文集[C];2012年

6 林鵬程;;層次分析法在設(shè)備評(píng)標(biāo)過程中的應(yīng)用[A];上海空港（第5輯）[C];2007年

7 駱正清;;基于聚類與合并算法的層次分析法[A];Well-off Society Strategies and Systems Engineering--Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of System Engineering Society of China[C];2004年

8 王鐵成;李新華;;改進(jìn)的層次分析法在重大建設(shè)工程項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)識(shí)別中的應(yīng)用[A];中國(guó)災(zāi)害防御協(xié)會(huì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分析專業(yè)委員會(huì)第二屆年會(huì)論文集（一）[C];2006年

9 陳孝文;;層次分析法在比質(zhì)比價(jià)采購(gòu)中的應(yīng)用研究[A];湖北省煙草學(xué)會(huì)2006年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2006年

10 靳文生;郝世強(qiáng);;層次分析法在應(yīng)對(duì)整車項(xiàng)目研發(fā)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)中的應(yīng)用[A];西南汽車信息：2013年第9期（總第330期）[C];2013年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 中海油能源發(fā)展股份有限公司 王曉峰;層次分析法在石油企業(yè)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估中的應(yīng)用探究[N];中國(guó)會(huì)計(jì)報(bào);2012年

2 本報(bào)記者 徐蔚冰;中國(guó)總部企業(yè)國(guó)際影響力不斷提升[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)報(bào);2014年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張小琳;基于修正層次分析法的我國(guó)石油貿(mào)易風(fēng)險(xiǎn)問題研究[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2014年

2 蔡樺楊;基于臨床病例和層次分析法的中醫(yī)臨床實(shí)踐指南應(yīng)用評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2015年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 代嘉冕;基于層次分析法和語(yǔ)義差別法的北京運(yùn)河公園使用狀況評(píng)價(jià)[D];沈陽(yáng)農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2017年

2 陳卓;基于層次分析法的海上油氣田節(jié)能評(píng)價(jià)體系研究[D];北京建筑大學(xué);2015年

3 張玉杰;政府公共財(cái)政績(jī)效審計(jì)研究[D];河北大學(xué);2015年

4 崔恩澤;層次分析法在工程招投標(biāo)中的應(yīng)用研究[D];山東建筑大學(xué);2015年

5 劉長(zhǎng)鑫;基于層次分析法的遠(yuǎn)程教學(xué)質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)體系研究[D];渤海大學(xué);2015年

6 趙海云;K市市級(jí)統(tǒng)建“棄土消納場(chǎng)”社會(huì)管理方引進(jìn)選擇評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];昆明理工大學(xué);2015年

7 韓靜;楊凌熱電廠工程農(nóng)業(yè)生態(tài)環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2015年

8 張飛;微店網(wǎng)電子商務(wù)模式的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分析與評(píng)價(jià)[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2015年

9 Martin AkelimbonaAtebiya（馬�。�;加納礦業(yè)投資環(huán)境評(píng)價(jià)[D];中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)(北京);2015年

10 呂杰;交叉橋梁與被交運(yùn)營(yíng)公路施工安全評(píng)估研究[D];長(zhǎng)安大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2482709