本文選題：結(jié)構(gòu)主義 + 方法論�。� 參考：《山東建筑大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文旨在亞歷杭德羅·阿拉維納獲得2016年普利茨克建筑獎(jiǎng)的背景下,對(duì)基于結(jié)構(gòu)主義方法論的建筑可變性設(shè)計(jì)思想與實(shí)踐源流進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)整理,歸納其設(shè)計(jì)體系,并結(jié)合當(dāng)前背景與趨勢(shì)對(duì)建筑可變性設(shè)計(jì)未來的發(fā)展作出展望。這類建筑設(shè)計(jì)思路在結(jié)構(gòu)主義哲學(xué)廣泛流行的20世紀(jì)60年代開始集中涌現(xiàn),包括以阿爾多·凡·艾克與赫曼·赫茨伯格為代表的荷蘭結(jié)構(gòu)主義建筑,以約納·弗里德曼、建筑電訊集團(tuán)和新陳代謝運(yùn)動(dòng)為代表的技術(shù)烏托邦式建筑理論實(shí)踐,以及以約翰·哈布拉肯的SAR體系支撐體住宅、開放建筑運(yùn)動(dòng)為代表的反烏托邦式的建筑理論實(shí)踐等方面。與阿拉維納的住房項(xiàng)目相似,它們均展現(xiàn)了以結(jié)構(gòu)主義方法論為基礎(chǔ)的、預(yù)留建筑可變性的特征,可被一同納入到“基于結(jié)構(gòu)主義方法論的建筑可變性設(shè)計(jì)”這一統(tǒng)一框架下進(jìn)行研究與比較。同時(shí),基于共同的方法論基礎(chǔ)和可變性設(shè)計(jì)意圖,它們發(fā)展出了各自不同的建筑可變性設(shè)計(jì)方法模式,使我們能夠通過理論與實(shí)踐兩個(gè)層面的分析,總結(jié)其設(shè)計(jì)體系與思路,并在當(dāng)前的社會(huì)背景下予以再定位。本文試圖通過“基于結(jié)構(gòu)主義方法論的建筑可變性設(shè)計(jì)”這一共同的體系框架對(duì)上述各類實(shí)踐進(jìn)行研究與辨析,找出這類建筑在設(shè)計(jì)操作層面的基本模式,在共時(shí)與歷時(shí)的基礎(chǔ)上總結(jié)其設(shè)計(jì)體系,為當(dāng)前背景下進(jìn)行建筑可變性設(shè)計(jì)提供更為全面的參照與思路。在此基礎(chǔ)上,本文分為四個(gè)部分,共六章。第一部分(第1章)闡述了研究背景、研究目的、國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀、研究內(nèi)容與框架及研究意義。第二部分(第2章至第4章)從結(jié)構(gòu)主義方法論和建筑可變性兩個(gè)層面檢視了20世紀(jì)60年代至今的各類建筑思想與實(shí)踐,提出統(tǒng)一的研究框架與范疇,并在此范疇內(nèi)對(duì)所涉及的典型建筑理論與實(shí)踐分別進(jìn)行分析、對(duì)比與總結(jié)。以歷時(shí)的對(duì)比研究為基礎(chǔ),歸納結(jié)構(gòu)主義方法論與建筑可變性設(shè)計(jì)目標(biāo)對(duì)應(yīng)到建筑體系下的設(shè)計(jì)方法論,指出建筑可變性設(shè)計(jì)的基本觀念開放性基礎(chǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)在建筑物質(zhì)體系與功能體系下的構(gòu)成方式。第三部分(第5章)基于上述研究,對(duì)應(yīng)到當(dāng)前的數(shù)字化建筑設(shè)計(jì)背景下對(duì)未來的可能性作出預(yù)期和展望。最后,第6章作為結(jié)語,總結(jié)了全文的結(jié)論與不足,并指出了未來的研究方向。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to systematize the source and practice of architectural variability design based on structuralism methodology under the background of Alejandro Alavena winning the 2016 Pritzker Architecture Award, and to sum up its design system. Combined with the current background and trend, the future development of architectural variability design is prospected. Such architectural design ideas began to emerge in the 1960s, when structuralist philosophy became popular, including Dutch structuralist architecture represented by Aldo Van Eyck and Herman Hertzberg, and Jonah Friedman. The Utopian architectural theory and practice represented by architectural telecommunication group and metabolic movement, and the anti-utopian architectural theory practice represented by John Hablarken's SAR system support house and open building movement. Similar to Alavina's housing projects, they all exhibit structural methodological features that allow for architectural variability. It can be studied and compared under the unified framework of "Architectural variability Design based on Structuralism Methodology". At the same time, based on the common methodology foundation and the design intention of variability, they have developed different architectural variability design methods and patterns, which enable us to sum up the design system and train of thought through theoretical and practical analysis. And in the current social background to reposition. This paper attempts to study and discriminate the above kinds of practices through the common system frame of "Architectural variability Design based on Structuralism Methodology", and find out the basic mode of this kind of architecture in the design operation level. On the basis of synchronic and diachronic, the design system is summarized, which provides a more comprehensive reference and train of thought for the design of architectural variability under the current background. On this basis, this paper is divided into four parts, a total of six chapters. The first part (Chapter 1) describes the research background, research purpose, domestic and foreign research status, research content and framework and research significance. The second part (chapter 2 to chapter 4) examines all kinds of architectural ideas and practices from the perspectives of structuralism methodology and architectural variability, and puts forward a unified research framework and category. In this category, the typical architectural theory and practice are analyzed, compared and summarized respectively. On the basis of diachronic comparative study, we conclude that the methodology of structuralism and the design objective of architectural variability correspond to the design methodology under the architectural system. It is pointed out that the basic concept of architectural variability design is the construction mode of open infrastructure under the system of building material and function. The third part (Chapter 5) is based on the above research, corresponding to the prospect of the future under the background of the current digital architecture design. Finally, chapter 6 as a conclusion, summarizes the conclusions and shortcomings of the paper, and points out the future research direction.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東建筑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：TU201

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宋照青;建筑人生——我的建筑觀[J];新材料新裝飾;2004年12期

2 章明;我的建筑觀[J];建筑創(chuàng)作;2005年06期

3 鄭光復(fù);;負(fù)正論——建筑本質(zhì)新析[J];新建筑;1984年02期

4 陳綱倫;;建筑是藝術(shù)嗎?[J];新建筑;1984年01期

5 侯幼彬;;建筑民族化的系統(tǒng)考察[J];新建筑;1986年02期

6 周春雨　,彭晉媛;廣義建筑觀[J];規(guī)劃師;2000年01期

7 陶莉;建筑文化的明天──全球文化與地域文化[J];華中建筑;2000年02期

8 陸e，

本文編號(hào)：2058163