本文關(guān)鍵詞： 參與式規(guī)劃 村莊規(guī)劃 公眾參與 岜扒村　出處：《西安建筑科技大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：城鄉(xiāng)規(guī)劃作為一項(xiàng)公共政策,編制與實(shí)施中多元主體的參與十分必要。在住建部和無止橋基金會(huì)的支持下研究團(tuán)隊(duì)在岜扒村開展參與式規(guī)劃實(shí)踐研究,實(shí)踐中呈現(xiàn)出村民參與意識淡薄、參與積極性差,并出現(xiàn)與相關(guān)部門就村莊建設(shè)問題斡旋調(diào)解失敗、急功近利的村干部對研究團(tuán)隊(duì)質(zhì)疑,村民對村莊發(fā)展及文化傳承的冷漠等一系列參與失效的問題。因此,研究以岜扒村參與式規(guī)劃實(shí)踐為對象,回顧與反思實(shí)踐過程,總結(jié)經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn)。研究基于國內(nèi)外參與式規(guī)劃理論與方法的梳理及案例借鑒,建構(gòu)參與式規(guī)劃路徑的理論框架用以指導(dǎo)岜扒村參與式規(guī)劃實(shí)踐;并從前期調(diào)研、方案交流、規(guī)劃評審、項(xiàng)目實(shí)施四個(gè)階段回顧實(shí)踐中的不同境遇,總結(jié)經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn)及面臨的現(xiàn)實(shí)困境;基于政治學(xué)、經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、文化學(xué)、社會(huì)學(xué)等多學(xué)科的理論視野,思考并挖掘問題的本質(zhì),澄清鄉(xiāng)村參與式規(guī)劃建設(shè)陷入困境的深層次原因;并以岜扒實(shí)踐中的問題為導(dǎo)向、原因探析為基礎(chǔ),對現(xiàn)實(shí)環(huán)境下規(guī)劃學(xué)科及規(guī)劃專業(yè)人員如何推動(dòng)參與式規(guī)劃的發(fā)展提出相應(yīng)建議。研究認(rèn)為:岜扒實(shí)踐陷入困境源于當(dāng)前政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化、社會(huì)等因素的影響,政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)因素是導(dǎo)致參與失效的核心因素。政治因素決定多元主體參與的成長性質(zhì),是主導(dǎo)村民能否參與、參與深度的主要因素。經(jīng)濟(jì)因素是參與式規(guī)劃開展的物質(zhì)基礎(chǔ),影響參與主體的參與意識與能力。文化因素是村民參與意識淡薄、組織化程度低的重要原因。鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)的局限性及變化的社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)也影響村民參與。因此,參與式規(guī)劃的開展是一項(xiàng)社會(huì)系統(tǒng)工程,發(fā)展任重道遠(yuǎn),現(xiàn)實(shí)環(huán)境中規(guī)劃工作者應(yīng)回歸理性,通過切實(shí)可行的規(guī)劃行動(dòng)推動(dòng)參與式規(guī)劃的研究與實(shí)踐。隨著制度的完善、經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展、公民社會(huì)的成長,參與式規(guī)劃將會(huì)在適宜的土壤中更好的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Urban and rural planning as a public policy, the preparation and implementation of the participation of multiple subjects is very necessary. Under the support of the Ministry of Housing and Non-stop Bridge Foundation, the research team carried out participatory planning practice research in Basha village. In practice, villagers' participation consciousness is weak, participation enthusiasm is poor, and with the relevant departments on the issue of village construction mediation failure, eager for quick success of the village cadres questioned the research team. The villagers' apathy to the village development and the cultural inheritance and so on a series of participation invalidation questions. Therefore, the research takes the Basha village participatory planning practice as the object, reviews and reflects the practice process. Based on the theories and methods of participatory planning at home and abroad and case studies, the paper constructs the theoretical framework of participatory planning path to guide the practice of participatory planning in Bazaowan village. And from the previous research, program exchange, planning review, project implementation of the four stages of the review of different circumstances in practice, summing up experience and lessons and the practical difficulties faced; Based on the theory of politics, economics, culture, sociology and so on, the author ponders and excavates the essence of the problem, and clarifies the deep reason why the rural participatory planning and construction falls into a dilemma. And based on the problems in the practice of Basha bazaar, the analysis of the reasons is the foundation. This paper puts forward corresponding suggestions on how to promote the development of participatory planning in the field of planning and planning professionals in the realistic environment. The research shows that the predicament of Basha's practice stems from the current politics, economy and culture. The influence of social factors, political and economic factors are the core factors that lead to the failure of participation. Political factors determine the growth nature of multi-subject participation, is the dominant participation of villagers. The main factors of the depth of participation. Economic factors are the material basis of participatory planning, which affects the participation consciousness and ability of the participants. The cultural factor is the weak participation consciousness of villagers. The limitation of rural society and the changing social structure also affect villagers' participation. Therefore, the development of participatory planning is a social system engineering, and the development of it has a long way to go. In the realistic environment, planners should return to rationality and promote the research and practice of participatory planning through feasible planning actions. With the improvement of system, the development of economy and the growth of civil society. Participatory planning will develop better in the right soil.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西安建筑科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：TU982.29

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李昌平;;回首鄉(xiāng)建一百年,有待我輩新建設(shè)[J];建筑師;2016年05期

2 吳智剛;王帥;陳忠暖;;村鎮(zhèn)規(guī)劃中的公眾參與:理論與路徑安排[J];城市觀察;2015年02期

3 邊防;趙鵬軍;張銜春;屠李;;新時(shí)期我國鄉(xiāng)村規(guī)劃農(nóng)民公眾參與模式研究[J];現(xiàn)代城市研究;2015年04期

4 李良品;李思睿;;改土歸流:國家權(quán)力在西南民族地區(qū)鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)的擴(kuò)張[J];青海民族研究;2015年02期

5 樊海強(qiáng);張鷹;劉淑虎;趙立珍;;基于自組織理論的傳統(tǒng)村落更新模式實(shí)證研究[J];長安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年04期

6 樊海強(qiáng);劉淑虎;張鷹;;傳統(tǒng)村落的空心化與AMTR規(guī)劃設(shè)計(jì)策略——以尤溪縣桂峰村為例[J];建筑與文化;2014年11期

7 童小溪;;從“鄉(xiāng)土中國”到“離土中國”:城鄉(xiāng)變遷的時(shí)空維度[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2014年05期

8 邵沁妍;;農(nóng)民政治參與的困境與原因探析[J];科學(xué)社會(huì)主義;2014年01期

9 李慧;王思元;吳丹子;;反磁力吸引體系——解決“空心村”問題的新探索[J];中國園林;2013年12期

10 楊芙蓉;黃應(yīng)霖;;我國臺(tái)灣地區(qū)社區(qū)規(guī)劃師制度的形成與發(fā)展歷程探究[J];規(guī)劃師;2013年09期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 黃亞平;羅吉;彭陽;;社會(huì)發(fā)展視角下城市規(guī)劃制度價(jià)值取向研究[A];和諧城市規(guī)劃——2007中國城市規(guī)劃年會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 田毅鵬;;中國社會(huì)后單位時(shí)代來臨?[N];社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2010年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 高洪貴;中國農(nóng)民工政治參與：制度環(huán)境、現(xiàn)狀分析與實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 賀文萃;社區(qū)發(fā)展規(guī)劃中的公眾參與研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2014年

2 張堯;村民參與型鄉(xiāng)村規(guī)劃模式的建構(gòu)[D];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

3 劉婧;歷史文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)中的公眾參與[D];重慶大學(xué);2007年

4 劉學(xué)鵬;構(gòu)建農(nóng)民利益表達(dá)機(jī)制研究[D];四川大學(xué);2005年

5 沈銳;社區(qū)規(guī)劃的理論分析與探索[D];西北大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：1446302