血液感染優(yōu)勢細菌和真菌種類分析及Verigene-DNA芯片快速檢測效果的研究
[Abstract]:Purpose To understand the species and drug resistance of the blood-infected bacteria and fungi in the third People's Hospital of Hangzhou from 2008 to 2014, and to study the effect of the Veriene-DNA chip on the rapid detection of the Gram-positive bacteria in the blood Fruit. Methods The bacteria and fungi were isolated and cultured in 19789 human peripheral blood samples by using BacT/ ALERT3D blood specimen culture system and one-sided single-bottle, one-sided double-bottle and two-sided double-bottle method. The strains were identified by the VITEK2Compact system and the paper-paper diffusion method, respectively. Sensitivity of the element. The test-tested bacterial isolates, p-, were confirmed using the CLSI-recommended method of paper diffusion. The positive rate of isolation and culture of different blood culture modes, the superiority of the bacteria or the fungi, and the drug sensitivity of the isolated strains were investigated by using the statistical software. Sex analysis was carried out. The isolated 98 strains of Gram-positive bacteria were identified by the Veriene-DNA chip and their drug-resistant genes were tested. The results of the strain identification were compared with the VITEK2Compact system. PC Results In the above 19789 peripheral blood samples, the positive rate of bacterial and fungal blood culture (29,22%) of the two-sided double-bottle method was significantly higher than that of one-sided single-bottle (8.28%) and one-sided double-bottle (12.34 %) (p0.01). Among the 124 isolated strains of 1876, Staphylococcus hominis, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphyloc@@ S (s capitis), Enterococcus faecium, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus faecalis were 11.46%-3.00% and the remaining 114 species were isolated. The separation rates of Candida parapsilosis, Candida albicans, Candida glabrata and Candida guillimondii were 25.00%, 21.32%, 16.91% and 11.76%, respectively, and the other 14 fungi were isolated. The isolation rate was less than 8%. All of the strains of Staphylococci were sensitive to rilenalidomide, vancomycin and tigecycline, but the rate of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci (MRCoNS) (87.88%,116/132) was significantly higher than that of methicillin-resistant S. aureus, MRS A) (54.77%,109/199) (p0.01). The sensitive rate of tigecycline was 100% in 92 strains of Enterococcus faecium and 56 strains of Enterococcus faecium, and the sensitive rate of the rilenalamine was 97.01% and 95.56%, respectively. The detection rates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) were 15.22% (14/92) and 8.93% (5/56) respectively. The sensitivity of imipenem, ertapenem, tigecycline, cefotitan, amikacin, zacillin/ tafluvial/ tafluvial and babbitum was 92.31%-99.52%, but 1.03% and 0.48% of the strains were resistant to carbapenem The sensitivity of 122 strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae to amikacin, cefotitan, tigecycline and compound neomycin was 77.05%-79.51%, but 32.71% and 31.15% respectively applied to carbapenem antibacterial drug. The sensitivity of the 71 strains of Acinetobacter baumannii to polymyxin B, tigecycline, amikacin, and ceftriaxone/ sulbactam was 60% to 100%, and 29 strains of Candida albicans were sensitive to fluconazole, Iqu concha, g. The sensitive rate of mycotoxin,5-fluorophonate, nystatin and amphotericin B was 100%, and the sensitivity of 34 strains of near-smooth Candida to 5-fluorophonate and myxin B was 100%. The sensitive rate of the 5-fluorophonate, the amphotericin B and the myxin B was 100%, but the sensitive rate was 56.52% ~ 85.71%, and the sensitive rate was 56.52% ~ 85.71%. The 16 strains were also sensitive to 5-fluoro-cytomycin and amphotericin B. The results of the identification of 16 98 strains of Gram-positive bacteria and VITEK2Compact system were 91.84% (90/98), 91.67% (55/60), 92.59% (25/27) and 90.00% (9/10), respectively. At the time of the identification, about 3.1 h, but when the VITEK2Compact system was identified for about 43 h.22 strains of S. aureus and 12 S. epidermidis, the Verigene-DNA chip method was used to detect 21 and 8 strains of methicillin-resistant related mecA gene, and the result of the PCR was completely consistent with that of the 9 strains of Enterococcus faecalis. And 1 and 5 strains of vancomycin-resistant vanA gene were detected by the Veriene-DNA chip method, and the results of PCR were the same, but the results of PCR showed that 2 strains of enterococcus faecium were found. bacteria-carrying Conclusion The two-sided double-bottle method can increase the blood sample. The positive rate of bacterial and fungal isolates was positive. The dominant blood-infected bacteria were Staphylococcus, E. coli, S. aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis (10%), and the dominant blood-infected fungi were Candida, Candida albicans, and Nostoglobus glabrata. In spite of the differences in the sensitivity of different kinds of bacteria and fungal clinical strains to different antibacterial drugs, the Gram-positive strain has a high sensitivity to the tigecycline and tigecycline, and the Gram-negative strains are highly sensitive to tigecycline and Amicka. 5-fluoro-1-(5-fluoro-1)-(2-)-(2-)-(5-fluorophenyl) in comparison with that VITEK2compact system, the Veriene-DNA chip method has the advantages of fast, accurate, simple and convenient and simultaneous detection of the bacterial drug resistance gene,
【學(xué)位授予單位】:浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號】:R446.5
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 丁爽;閆玲;李若倩;黃平;馬萍;;PCT和CRP對菌血癥的診斷價值比較[J];國際檢驗醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2014年07期
2 嚴(yán)育忠;范惠清;徐英;周秀梅;陸燕春;;兩種檢測超廣譜β-內(nèi)酰胺酶表型方法的比較[J];中國感染控制雜志;2012年05期
3 李光輝;朱德妹;汪復(fù);倪語星;孫景勇;徐英春;張小江;胡云建;艾效曼;俞云松;林潔;孫自鏞;陳中舉;賈蓓;黃文祥;卓超;蘇丹虹;魏蓮花;吳玲;張朝霞;季萍;王傳清;王愛敏;張泓;孔菁;徐元宏;沈繼錄;單斌;杜艷;楊青;;2011年中國CHINET血培養(yǎng)臨床分離菌的分布及耐藥性[J];中國感染與化療雜志;2013年04期
4 張慧;楊啟文;徐英春;謝秀麗;陳民鈞;;北京協(xié)和醫(yī)院2000~2013年血培養(yǎng)病原菌分布及耐藥性分析[J];檢驗醫(yī)學(xué)與臨床;2014年18期
5 李光輝;朱德妹;汪復(fù);胡志東;李全;孫自鏞;陳中舉;徐英春;張小江;王傳清;王愛敏;倪語星;孫景勇;褚云卓;俞云松;林潔;徐元宏;沈繼錄;蘇丹虹;卓超;魏蓮花;吳玲;張朝霞;季萍;張泓;孔菁;胡云建;艾效曼;單斌;杜艷;;2012年中國CHINET血培養(yǎng)臨床分離菌的分布及耐藥性[J];中國感染與化療雜志;2014年06期
6 徐英春;臨床微生物學(xué)血培養(yǎng)操作規(guī)范[J];中華檢驗醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2004年02期
7 彭佳;府偉靈;張曉兵;;血培養(yǎng)中真菌的分布及耐藥性分析[J];中華醫(yī)院感染學(xué)雜志;2006年11期
8 李冰;郭珊;呂錦琪;;血流感中的病原菌分布及耐藥性分析[J];中國微生態(tài)學(xué)雜志;2014年03期
9 張凱;喻華;黃湘寧;劉鑫;黃影;;四川省細菌耐藥監(jiān)測網(wǎng)2011~2012年血流感染病原菌分布及耐藥分析[J];實用醫(yī)院臨床雜志;2014年06期
10 楊兵,陳小青,嚴(yán)杰;腹膜炎患者臨床標(biāo)本中無芽孢厭氧菌的分離和鑒定[J];微生物學(xué)雜志;2001年04期
,本文編號:2506283
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/huliyixuelunwen/2506283.html