比較腹腔鏡法及傳統(tǒng)手術(shù)法腹透管植入術(shù)安全性及導(dǎo)管生存率的meta分析
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-04 08:02
【摘要】：目的：腹膜透析(Peritoneal Dialysis)是現(xiàn)代腎臟替代治療方法的基本方法之一。腹膜透析管是腹透患者的“生命線”,但各種導(dǎo)管相關(guān)并發(fā)癥會影響腹透管功能,很多病人甚至因此退出腹膜透析。目前已有許多觀察性研究報道了腹透管植入方法會影響導(dǎo)管相關(guān)并發(fā)癥的發(fā)生率,本文旨在通過對這些臨床研究進(jìn)行meta分析以比較腹腔鏡及常規(guī)腹膜透析置管術(shù)的安全性及導(dǎo)管生存率。方法：以“腹膜透析"、“腹腔鏡”為主要檢索詞檢索中國知網(wǎng)、維普等數(shù)據(jù)庫,以"peritoneal dialysis"、"peritoneoscopic"、"peritoneoscopy"、"laparoscopy"及"laparoscopic"等主要檢索詞檢索Pubmed、Elsevier Sciencedirect、Cochrane Library及Springer等外文數(shù)據(jù)庫。收集比較兩種腹膜透析置管方式安全性及導(dǎo)管生存率隨機(jī)對照試驗或觀察性研究。采用R evMan5.3軟件進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計處理,最后對所有結(jié)論采用GRADE標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行證據(jù)質(zhì)量分級,并制作結(jié)果匯總表,所用軟件為GRADEprofiler3.6。結(jié)果：通過計算機(jī)檢索得到文獻(xiàn)共553篇,經(jīng)過初篩及全文篩選,共入選文獻(xiàn)19篇。Meta分析結(jié)果顯示：腹腔鏡下置管術(shù)在控制導(dǎo)管移位方面優(yōu)于傳統(tǒng)手術(shù)(OR 0.22,95% CI 0.13 to 0.39; P0.00001),但會輕微增加出血的風(fēng)險(OR 2.13,95% CI 1.07 to 4.23; P= 0.03),而兩組手術(shù)在其它導(dǎo)管相關(guān)并發(fā)癥方面無顯著性差異。另外,腹腔鏡置管術(shù)較傳統(tǒng)手術(shù)的導(dǎo)管生存率高(1年生存率：OR 2.64,95% CI 1.69 to 4.14;P0.0001；2年生存率：OR 2.18,95% CI 1.48 to 3.21; P0.0001)。以上結(jié)果的GRADE分級只有腹透管移位的研究質(zhì)量為A級,其余皆為B級或C級�？傮w研究質(zhì)量屬于中等。結(jié)論：總體而言,腹腔鏡置管術(shù)較傳統(tǒng)手術(shù)能減少導(dǎo)管移位及提高導(dǎo)管生存率,但會輕微增加出血風(fēng)險,本研究總體質(zhì)量屬于中等,尚需進(jìn)一步研究支持。
[Abstract]:Objective: peritoneal dialysis (Peritoneal Dialysis) is one of the basic methods of modern renal replacement therapy. Peritoneal dialysis tube is the lifeline of peritoneal dialysis patients, but many patients even quit peritoneal dialysis because of various catheter related complications. At present, there have been many observational studies on the incidence of catheter-related complications that can be affected by the implantation of abdominal dialysis tubes. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and survival rate of laparoscopic and conventional peritoneal dialysis catheterization by meta analysis of these clinical studies. Methods: using "peritoneal dialysis" and "laparoscopy" as the main keywords to search the database of China Zhiwang, Weip and other databases, Pubmed,Elsevier Sciencedirect, was searched with the main keywords of "peritoneal dialysis", "peritoneoscopic", "peritoneoscopy", "laparoscopy" and "laparoscopic". Cochrane Library, Springer and other foreign language databases. A randomized controlled trial or observational study was conducted to compare the safety and survival rate of two peritoneal dialysis catheterization methods. R evMan5.3 software is used for statistical processing. Finally, GRADE standard is used to classify the quality of evidence, and a summary table of results is made. The software used is GRADEprofiler3.6.. Results: a total of 553 articles were obtained by computer retrieval. The results of Meta analysis showed that laparoscopic catheterization was superior to traditional operation in controlling catheter displacement (OR 0.2295% CI 0.13 to 0.39; P0.00001, but slightly increased the risk of bleeding (OR 2.1395% CI 1.07 to 4.23; P = 0.03), but there was no significant difference in other catheter-related complications between the two groups. In addition, the catheter survival rate of laparoscopic catheterization was higher than that of conventional catheterization (1-year survival rate: OR 2.64%, 95% CI 1.69 to 4.14 P0.0001; 2-year survival rate: OR 2.1895% CI 1.48 to 3.21; P0.0001). The GRADE grade of the above results was only A grade for abdominal canal transposition, while the others were B or C grade. The overall quality of research is medium. Conclusion: in general, laparoscopic catheterization can reduce catheter displacement and improve catheter survival rate, but it will slightly increase the risk of bleeding. The overall quality of this study is moderate and needs further research support.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：R459.5
本文編號：2309220
[Abstract]:Objective: peritoneal dialysis (Peritoneal Dialysis) is one of the basic methods of modern renal replacement therapy. Peritoneal dialysis tube is the lifeline of peritoneal dialysis patients, but many patients even quit peritoneal dialysis because of various catheter related complications. At present, there have been many observational studies on the incidence of catheter-related complications that can be affected by the implantation of abdominal dialysis tubes. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and survival rate of laparoscopic and conventional peritoneal dialysis catheterization by meta analysis of these clinical studies. Methods: using "peritoneal dialysis" and "laparoscopy" as the main keywords to search the database of China Zhiwang, Weip and other databases, Pubmed,Elsevier Sciencedirect, was searched with the main keywords of "peritoneal dialysis", "peritoneoscopic", "peritoneoscopy", "laparoscopy" and "laparoscopic". Cochrane Library, Springer and other foreign language databases. A randomized controlled trial or observational study was conducted to compare the safety and survival rate of two peritoneal dialysis catheterization methods. R evMan5.3 software is used for statistical processing. Finally, GRADE standard is used to classify the quality of evidence, and a summary table of results is made. The software used is GRADEprofiler3.6.. Results: a total of 553 articles were obtained by computer retrieval. The results of Meta analysis showed that laparoscopic catheterization was superior to traditional operation in controlling catheter displacement (OR 0.2295% CI 0.13 to 0.39; P0.00001, but slightly increased the risk of bleeding (OR 2.1395% CI 1.07 to 4.23; P = 0.03), but there was no significant difference in other catheter-related complications between the two groups. In addition, the catheter survival rate of laparoscopic catheterization was higher than that of conventional catheterization (1-year survival rate: OR 2.64%, 95% CI 1.69 to 4.14 P0.0001; 2-year survival rate: OR 2.1895% CI 1.48 to 3.21; P0.0001). The GRADE grade of the above results was only A grade for abdominal canal transposition, while the others were B or C grade. The overall quality of research is medium. Conclusion: in general, laparoscopic catheterization can reduce catheter displacement and improve catheter survival rate, but it will slightly increase the risk of bleeding. The overall quality of this study is moderate and needs further research support.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：R459.5
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 謝平;袁利;劉峰;;腹腔鏡下腹膜透析置管術(shù)與開腹手術(shù)的療效及安全性比較[J];河北醫(yī)學(xué);2014年04期
2 敖翔;周巧玲;聶晚年;歐陽燕蘭;;腹腔鏡下腹膜透析置管與傳統(tǒng)開腹置管的臨床對比研究[J];中國血液凈化;2012年10期
3 周成明;趙新;張金輝;邰沁文;熱娜古麗·努爾;溫浩;;腹腔鏡與開腹腹膜透析置管術(shù)式比較[J];新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報;2014年05期
，本文編號：2309220
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/huliyixuelunwen/2309220.html
最近更新
教材專著
