本文選題：食胎盤行為 + 羊胎素療法��； 參考：《科普研究》2016年05期

【摘要】：食用胎盤及羊胎素"活細胞療法"的流行伴隨著爭議,支持方與反對方給出的依據(jù)主要涉及"科學"和"歷史"兩個方面。梳理目前的科學研究發(fā)現(xiàn),食用胎盤的療效與危害均無嚴格確鑿的科學證據(jù);羊胎素與"干細胞治療"全無關聯(lián),羊胎素"活細胞療法"也未得到監(jiān)管機構認可。中國古代掩埋胎盤較食用胎盤的歷史更為悠久,且胎盤入藥自古便存在反對聲音,因此歷史悠久不能作為療效證據(jù)。中國悠久的養(yǎng)生觀念、養(yǎng)生產(chǎn)品的高需求和高利潤,以及科學研究的缺失所留下的認知空間,導致此類產(chǎn)品在缺乏科學依據(jù)和歷史依據(jù)的情況下仍然流行。
[Abstract]:The prevalence of "live cell therapy" in placenta and sheep foetus is controversial. The basis given by supporters and opponents mainly involves two aspects: "science" and "history". Combing the current scientific research, we found that there is no strict scientific evidence of the efficacy and harm of eating placenta, there is no relationship between sheep fetal hormone and stem cell therapy, and sheep fetal hormone living cell therapy has not been approved by the regulatory body. The placenta buried in ancient China has a longer history than the edible placenta, and the placenta medicine has been opposed since ancient times, so it can not be used as evidence of curative effect for a long time. China's long concept of health preservation, the high demand and high profit of health products, and the lack of scientific research leave the cognitive space for this kind of products, resulting in the lack of scientific basis and historical basis of this kind of products are still popular.
【作者單位】： 中國科學院大學歷史學系;
【分類號】：R45

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 U.Wedeg釨rtner;S.Popovych;J.Yamamura;H.Kooijman;G.Adam;郭雪梅;;羊胎腦缺氧的3.0T與1.5T MRI ΔR_2~*的對照研究[J];國際醫(yī)學放射學雜志;2009年05期

2 ;[J];;年期

相關會議論文 前1條

1 熊莉;趙博文;黎鵬;;二維超聲應變成像評價慢性貧血羊胎心心肌功能及其對急性后負荷增加的反應[A];2011年浙江省超聲醫(yī)學學術年會論文匯編[C];2011年

，

本文編號：2111753