發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-16 13:12

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 境外中資控股上市公司 紅籌回歸 境內(nèi)上市　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：20世紀(jì)90年代,中國(guó)的國(guó)營(yíng)和民營(yíng)企業(yè)在經(jīng)過(guò)十余年改革開(kāi)放洗禮之后逐漸做強(qiáng)、做大,并隨之產(chǎn)生了巨大的融資需求。但是,當(dāng)時(shí)的國(guó)內(nèi)A股市場(chǎng)尚未完成股權(quán)分置改革,A股市場(chǎng)容納能力也遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不能滿(mǎn)足大型企業(yè)的融資需求。因此,國(guó)企和民企中的佼佼者相繼走上了境外上市融資的“資本朝圣之路”。我們將這些企業(yè)稱(chēng)之為“境外中資控股上市公司”,或者業(yè)界俗稱(chēng)的“紅籌股公司”。隨著我國(guó)證券市場(chǎng)股權(quán)分置改革的完成,資本市場(chǎng)的參與者逐漸成熟,各項(xiàng)配套措施也相繼完善,A股市場(chǎng)也進(jìn)入了一個(gè)高速發(fā)展期。A股市場(chǎng)的高市盈率以及不可估量的市場(chǎng)容量令一些大型紅籌國(guó)企萌生了回歸A股市場(chǎng)的想法。與此同時(shí),自2010年以來(lái),國(guó)際資本市場(chǎng)環(huán)境逐漸惡化,特別是“中國(guó)概念股”在美國(guó)證券市場(chǎng)遭受的冷遇,也使得一部分民企紅籌選擇拆除已經(jīng)搭建的紅籌架構(gòu),重新回歸A股上市。 然而,由于紅籌股公司在法律上屬于外國(guó)公司法人,而我國(guó)現(xiàn)行證券法律體系卻沒(méi)有外國(guó)公司法人發(fā)行A股的制度安排,因此紅籌股回歸面臨著諸多法律問(wèn)題,例如：紅籌股公司的法律屬性是什么?紅籌股公司應(yīng)當(dāng)選擇何種回歸模式?回歸之后的法律監(jiān)管應(yīng)當(dāng)如何進(jìn)行?本文著眼于通過(guò)分析問(wèn)題并提出一些建議來(lái)對(duì)紅籌回歸的脈絡(luò)加以梳理。 本文主要包括四個(gè)部分： 第一部分從研究對(duì)象的概念分析入手,首先澄清幾對(duì)容易混淆的概念,如H股、紅籌股、境外中資控股上市公司、紅籌架構(gòu)等,同時(shí)簡(jiǎn)要分析紅籌回歸的動(dòng)因。第二部分主要介紹紅籌回歸可能會(huì)采用的三種回歸模式,即聯(lián)通模式、A股直接發(fā)行模式和CDR模式,分析其中可能產(chǎn)生的法律問(wèn)題,并對(duì)回歸模式的選擇提出筆者的建議。第三部分就紅籌架構(gòu)回歸的特殊問(wèn)題進(jìn)行研究,分析其中的各種法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)并提出相應(yīng)對(duì)策。第四部分著重分析紅籌回歸后的法律監(jiān)管問(wèn)題。
[Abstract]:In 1990s, after more than a decade of reform and opening up to the outside world, Chinese state-owned and private enterprises gradually became stronger and bigger, with which huge financing needs arose. At that time, the domestic A-share market had not yet completed the reform of the split share structure, and the capacity of the A-share market was far from being able to meet the financing needs of large enterprises. The leaders of state-owned enterprises and private enterprises have successively embarked on the "pilgrimage of capital" to overseas listing and financing. We call these enterprises "overseas Chinese holding and listed companies", or "red chips companies" commonly known in the industry. The completion of the reform of the split share structure in the securities market, Participants in the capital markets are maturing, Various supporting measures have been improved one after another, and the A-share market has entered a period of rapid development. The high price-to-earnings ratio and inestimable market capacity of the A-share market have led some large red-chip state-owned enterprises to come up with the idea of returning to the A-share market. At the same time, Since 2010, the international capital market environment has deteriorated gradually, especially the cold reception of the "Chinese concept stocks" in the U.S. stock market, which has also made some private enterprises choose to dismantle the red chip structure that has been built and return to A-share listing. However, due to the fact that the red chip company is a legal person of a foreign company, but the current securities legal system of our country does not have the system of issuing A shares of a foreign company, the return of the red chip stock is faced with many legal problems. For example: what is the legal attribute of red chip company? What kind of regression model should red chip companies choose? How should the legal supervision be carried out after the reunification? This paper focuses on the analysis of the problem and puts forward some suggestions to sort out the context of red chip regression. This paper mainly includes four parts:. The first part begins with the conceptual analysis of the object of study. First of all, it clarifies several confusing concepts, such as H shares, red chips, overseas Chinese holding listed companies, red chips structure, etc. The second part mainly introduces three possible regression models of red chip regression, that is, Unicom mode, A-share direct issue model and CDR model, and analyzes the possible legal problems. And put forward the author's suggestion on the choice of regression model. The third part studies the special problems of red chip structure regression. Analysis of the various legal risks and put forward the corresponding countermeasures. 4th part focuses on the red chip after the return of legal supervision.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.291.91;F832.51

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳昊;;對(duì)紅籌股回歸促進(jìn)A股市場(chǎng)國(guó)際化的思考[J];北方經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年06期

2 魏剛,陳工孟;IPO公司盈余預(yù)測(cè)精確性之實(shí)證研究——H股、紅籌股上市公司與香港本地企業(yè)的一個(gè)比較[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2001年03期

3 劉澎;;市場(chǎng)分割狀態(tài)下紅籌股回歸A股的經(jīng)濟(jì)影響[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2009年04期

4 徐明;蔣輝宇;;外國(guó)公司在我國(guó)證券發(fā)行與上市的法律問(wèn)題[J];東方法學(xué);2009年02期

5 姜波克;中國(guó)存托憑證(CDR)與人民幣資本帳戶(hù)可兌換關(guān)系探討[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2002年04期

6 吳琳;張紅娣;;紅籌股回歸A股市場(chǎng)的影響分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2009年35期

7 李霖;;紅籌股公司回歸A股市場(chǎng)法律問(wèn)題研究[J];金融理論與實(shí)踐;2007年07期

8 李明輝,何海;對(duì)自愿性信息披露的若干思考[J];蘭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期

9 喬煒;;紅籌公司回歸境內(nèi)市場(chǎng)上市發(fā)行相關(guān)問(wèn)題研究[J];寧夏大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年06期

10 劉鳳元;;存托憑證相關(guān)法律問(wèn)題探討[J];上海金融;2007年12期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 李世剛;跨境上市信息披露問(wèn)題的法律研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2007年

2 章美媛;中國(guó)企業(yè)境外上市的法律問(wèn)題分析[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2009年

3 費(fèi)大可;擬上市公司去“紅籌架構(gòu)”分析[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1515597