發(fā)布時間：2018-01-12 09:43

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：住宅質(zhì)量管理制度研究　出處：《清華大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 住宅質(zhì)量管理 信任品 質(zhì)量信息披露 激勵機制

【摘要】：住宅是人們?nèi)粘Ｉ钭钪匾南M品和投資品之一，，住宅質(zhì)量狀況與人民生命財產(chǎn)安全息息相關(guān)。隨著我國城市化進程的深入和房地產(chǎn)市場的繁榮，每年有大量住宅工程開工建設(shè)，也有大批住宅在市場上交易并投入使用。但長期以來，我國住宅質(zhì)量狀況一直不容樂觀，住宅質(zhì)量事故頻頻發(fā)生。普通消費者雖然關(guān)注住宅質(zhì)量，但卻由于缺乏專業(yè)知識和設(shè)備無法識別住宅質(zhì)量，導(dǎo)致住宅質(zhì)量無法被內(nèi)化到住宅價格中。住宅質(zhì)量信息在買賣雙方間存在嚴(yán)重不對稱導(dǎo)致住宅交易市場上存在大量的質(zhì)量欺詐，房地產(chǎn)開發(fā)企業(yè)也缺乏保證和提高住宅質(zhì)量的激勵。這些都為住宅質(zhì)量管理提出了挑戰(zhàn)。 傳統(tǒng)的住宅質(zhì)量管理研究更多從建筑市場管理入手，討論住宅建設(shè)過程的質(zhì)量管理辦法，而忽略了住宅交易市場上廣泛存在的信息不對稱問題。本研究分別從建筑市場和交易市場兩方面對住宅質(zhì)量管理制度進行研究。首先從不對稱信息和不公平博弈角度分析住宅建筑市場和交易市場上存在的市場失靈和私法失靈，建立住宅質(zhì)量政府管理的理論基礎(chǔ)。結(jié)合信任品理論研究和模型推導(dǎo)，分析住宅產(chǎn)品的信任品特征和市場上存在的質(zhì)量欺詐，提出建立住宅質(zhì)量評價和住宅質(zhì)量信息披露制度是矯正住宅市場不對稱信息，提高房地產(chǎn)開發(fā)企業(yè)住宅質(zhì)量保證激勵的重要途徑。從住宅建筑市場角度切入，本研究通過文獻梳理國內(nèi)外住宅質(zhì)量管理經(jīng)驗和國內(nèi)現(xiàn)行的住宅質(zhì)量管理制度，并結(jié)合專家訪談和實地調(diào)研分析我國當(dāng)前住宅質(zhì)量管理制度中存在的共性問題，包括住宅質(zhì)量管理公法調(diào)節(jié)的必要性、質(zhì)量責(zé)任分配不合理，質(zhì)量責(zé)任無法落實，對從業(yè)人員管理薄弱等；并針對各住宅質(zhì)量責(zé)任主體及參與機構(gòu)存在的問題進行具體分析，提出建立住宅質(zhì)量管理履責(zé)保證機制是確保質(zhì)量責(zé)任落實的重要途徑。其中住宅質(zhì)量管理履責(zé)機制包括激勵機制、責(zé)任追究機制和信用制度。此外，本文還針對住宅質(zhì)量管理的政府管理模式、法律調(diào)節(jié)方式、各責(zé)任主體和參與機構(gòu)存在問題提出了具體建議，包括強化建設(shè)單位質(zhì)量責(zé)任，監(jiān)理回歸業(yè)主咨詢師定位，通過推行質(zhì)量缺陷保險落實保修階段質(zhì)量責(zé)任等。
[Abstract]:Housing is one of the most important consumer goods and investment products in people's daily life. The quality of housing is closely related to the safety of people's lives and property. With the deepening of urbanization and the prosperity of real estate market in China. Every year, a large number of housing projects are started, and a large number of houses are traded and put into use in the market. However, for a long time, the quality of housing in China has not been optimistic. Residential quality accidents occur frequently. Although ordinary consumers are concerned about housing quality, they are unable to identify housing quality because of the lack of professional knowledge and equipment. As a result, housing quality can not be internalized into the housing price. The existence of serious asymmetry between buyers and sellers of housing quality information leads to a large number of quality fraud in the housing trading market. The real estate development enterprises also lack the incentive to guarantee and improve the housing quality, all of which pose a challenge to the housing quality management. Traditional residential quality management studies more from the construction market management, discusses the housing construction process of quality management methods. This study studies the housing quality management system from the construction market and the trading market respectively. First of all, the asymmetric information and unfair game are studied. This paper analyzes the market failure and private law failure in the residential construction market and the trading market. This paper establishes the theoretical basis of government management of housing quality and analyzes the characteristics of trust products and quality fraud in the market by combining the theoretical research and model derivation of trust goods. It is proposed that the establishment of housing quality evaluation and housing quality information disclosure system is an important way to correct the asymmetric information in the housing market and to improve the incentive of housing quality assurance in real estate development enterprises. This research combs the domestic and foreign residence quality management experience and the domestic present residence quality management system through the literature, and combines the expert interview and the field investigation to analyze the common problems existing in the current housing quality management system of our country. Including the necessity of regulation of public law of housing quality management, unreasonable distribution of quality responsibility, failure to implement quality responsibility, weak management of employees and so on; And in view of each residence quality responsibility main body and the participation organization existence question carries on the concrete analysis. It is put forward that establishing the accountability guarantee mechanism of housing quality management is an important way to ensure the implementation of quality responsibility, among which the performance mechanism of residential quality management includes incentive mechanism, accountability mechanism and credit system. This paper also puts forward specific suggestions for the government management mode, the legal regulation mode, the main body of responsibility and the participating organizations of housing quality management, including strengthening the quality responsibility of construction units. Supervision return to owner consultant position, through the implementation of quality defect insurance to implement warranty stage quality responsibility.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：清華大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：TU712.3;F299.23

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 龔剛強;;法體系基本結(jié)構(gòu)的理性基礎(chǔ)——從法經(jīng)濟學(xué)視角看公私法劃分和私法公法化、公法私法化[J];法學(xué)家;2005年03期

2 潘延平;竣工驗收備案制度與政府工程質(zhì)量監(jiān)督機制改革[J];工程質(zhì)量;2001年06期

3 崔曉青;;住宅開發(fā)項目全面質(zhì)量信息公開問題研究[J];工程質(zhì)量;2006年01期

4 姜紅;滕曉敏;;關(guān)于對建筑工程質(zhì)量檢測管理改革的探討(一)[J];工程質(zhì)量;2010年10期

5 王肅元,馮玉軍;國家制定法與民間法的供求分析[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);1999年02期

6 姜紅;滕曉敏;;關(guān)于對建筑工程質(zhì)量檢測管理改革的探討(二)[J];工程質(zhì)量;2010年11期

7 李海濤;;進一步強化建設(shè)單位安全主體責(zé)任的建議[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年10期

8 郭漢丁,劉應(yīng)宗;論建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量政府監(jiān)督機構(gòu)改革[J];建筑;2002年01期

9 郭漢丁,劉應(yīng)宗,王丹;住宅工程質(zhì)量的政府監(jiān)督[J];建筑;2002年06期

10 鞏麗霞;;關(guān)于建筑工程質(zhì)量責(zé)任立法的探討[J];建筑管理現(xiàn)代化;2006年03期

本文編號：1413733