【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全治理是全球治理的重要內(nèi)容之一,地區(qū)組織在其中發(fā)揮著不可或缺的作用。根據(jù)自己的實(shí)際情況,東盟在網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全治理方面積極探索治理之道,初步形成了"東盟方式"。它將網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全更多地視為網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪問(wèn)題,并將網(wǎng)絡(luò)恐怖主義歸為網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪;充分尊重成員國(guó)的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)主權(quán),偏好非正式的制度安排,主要采用聲明、宣言、總體規(guī)劃和行動(dòng)計(jì)劃等較為松散靈活的制度形式;采取"最小限度的組織性",沒(méi)有應(yīng)對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全問(wèn)題的常設(shè)機(jī)構(gòu),只是松散的合作框架;非國(guó)家行為體在東盟網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全治理的過(guò)程中雖然有自己的聲音,但影響有限;與域外大國(guó)進(jìn)行網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全對(duì)話,開展網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全合作,但仍然保持自己的獨(dú)立性。
[Abstract]:Network security governance is one of the important contents of global governance, in which regional organizations play an indispensable role. According to its own actual situation, ASEAN actively explores the way of governance in the aspect of network security governance, and initially forms the "ASEAN way". It regards cybersecurity more as a problem of cybercrime and classifies cyberterrorism as cybercrime; fully respects the Internet sovereignty of member States and prefers informal institutional arrangements, mainly through declarations and declarations, Loose and flexible institutional form such as master plan and action plan; adopt "minimum organization", there is no permanent organization to deal with cybersecurity, only loose cooperation framework; Although non-State actors have their own voices in the process of ASEAN cybersecurity governance, they have limited influence.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治研究所;中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目“國(guó)際組織分析的社會(huì)學(xué)路徑研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):11BGJ003)的資助
【分類號(hào)】：D035;TP393.08

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 袁原,楊桃源;“10+1”聯(lián)手抗“非典”[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號(hào)：2270868