本文選題：互聯(lián)網(wǎng) + 再生資源��； 參考：《北京物資學(xué)院》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái),再生資源產(chǎn)業(yè)對(duì)我國(guó)國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)和環(huán)境保護(hù)的貢獻(xiàn)作用越來(lái)越凸顯。但不可否認(rèn),高效的再生資源回收方式是保證這一產(chǎn)業(yè)健康快速發(fā)展的關(guān)鍵,而研究發(fā)現(xiàn),目前我國(guó)再生資源主要回收方式仍集中在以低效率的傳統(tǒng)人流、物流等信息資源整合方式下的人工回收,其回收價(jià)格不透明、回收過(guò)程監(jiān)管難、安全漏洞大等問(wèn)題較多;當(dāng)前背景下,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的快速發(fā)展使我國(guó)眾多產(chǎn)業(yè)面臨變革,這在再生資源領(lǐng)域主要表現(xiàn)為新出現(xiàn)的以網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)為手段的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)回收模式,其回收方式在回收效率、安全監(jiān)管、回收價(jià)格、發(fā)展?jié)摿Φ确矫孑^傳統(tǒng)回收方式表現(xiàn)出更多的優(yōu)勢(shì)。因此,本文主要選取了當(dāng)前互聯(lián)網(wǎng)背景下再生資源回收領(lǐng)域新出現(xiàn)的O2O、B2C兩種典型回收模式,并結(jié)合具體的企業(yè)案例,根據(jù)層次分析法,構(gòu)造用戶接受程度,回收過(guò)程控制,具體回收效果三維度評(píng)價(jià)體系對(duì)兩種回收模式的特點(diǎn)、適用性等具體實(shí)踐效果做出比較研究,以對(duì)其實(shí)際效用及發(fā)展?jié)摿M(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),O2O回收模式下,其回收方式人性化、回收品種多元化、回收價(jià)格吸引力強(qiáng)等優(yōu)勢(shì)突出,網(wǎng)絡(luò)回收平臺(tái)操作簡(jiǎn)便,趣味性高,用戶對(duì)此接受程度較高;但O2O網(wǎng)絡(luò)回收平臺(tái)功能單一,線上回收監(jiān)管過(guò)程缺乏有力技術(shù)支撐,回收商集體競(jìng)價(jià)可靠程度較低,線下回收交易成本較高,回收處理體系建設(shè)較為困難等使其回收過(guò)程控制較差;具體回收效果方面,由于其目標(biāo)群體主要為個(gè)體投廢者,回收品種量小且分散,末端處理等節(jié)能減排效果較差,綜合實(shí)踐效果一般,但由于其用戶群體潛力巨大,回收范圍廣泛,未來(lái)具備多品種、寬領(lǐng)域再生資源回收的普遍推廣;B2C回收模式下,其回收方式、品種較為單一,網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)操作不便、平臺(tái)趣味性低等使用戶對(duì)此接受程度較低;但其回收平臺(tái)獨(dú)立功能強(qiáng)大,大數(shù)據(jù)管理實(shí)現(xiàn)回收過(guò)程高效監(jiān)管,交易價(jià)格指數(shù)規(guī)范使回收價(jià)格透明可靠,線下配套處理體系完善,線下回收交易成本較低等使其回收過(guò)程控制較好;具體回收效果方面,由于其智能回收技術(shù)對(duì)產(chǎn)品的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化程度要求較高,使其回收品種較為單一,但針對(duì)各類中間商的批量化回收和專業(yè)化處理,使其末端處理量、節(jié)能減排效果顯著,綜合實(shí)踐效果較好,但目前暫不適合多品種、寬領(lǐng)域再生資源回收的普遍推廣。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the contribution of renewable resource industry to national economy and environmental protection has become more and more prominent. However, it is undeniable that efficient recycling of renewable resources is the key to ensure the healthy and rapid development of this industry. However, the study found that the main recycling methods of renewable resources in China are still concentrated in the traditional flow of people with low efficiency. Under the integrated mode of logistics and other information resources, the recovery price is not transparent, the recycling process is difficult to supervise, the security loopholes are large, etc. Under the current background, the rapid development of the Internet makes many industries in our country face the change. In the field of renewable resources, this is mainly manifested in the emerging Internet recycling mode based on network platform, in which recycling efficiency, safety supervision, and price recovery are the main ways of recycling. Development potential and other aspects than the traditional way of recycling shows more advantages. Therefore, this paper mainly selects two typical recycling models of O2OB2C, which are emerging in the field of renewable resource recovery under the current Internet background, and combines with specific enterprise cases, constructs the user acceptance degree and recycling process control according to the Analytic hierarchy process (AHP). In order to evaluate the actual utility and development potential of the two kinds of recycling models, the three-dimensional degree evaluation system makes a comparative study on the characteristics and applicability of the two models. It is found that under the mode of O2O recovery, the recycling mode is humanized, the variety of recovery is diversified, the price of recovery is attractive and so on, the network recovery platform is easy to operate and has high interest, and the user has a high degree of acceptance of it. However, the recovery platform of O2O network has a single function, lack of strong technical support in the process of on-line recycling supervision, low reliability of collective bidding by recyclers, and high transaction cost of off-line recycling. The construction of recycling treatment system is difficult to control the recovery process. In the specific recovery effect, because the target group is mainly individual scrap, the quantity of recovered varieties is small and dispersed, the effect of energy saving and emission reduction such as terminal treatment is poor. The comprehensive practice effect is general, but because its user group potential is huge, the scope of recycling is wide, in the future, there are many varieties, wide range of renewable resources recycling universal promotion of B2C recycling mode, its recycling mode, variety is relatively single, The network platform is inconvenient to operate, and the platform is not interesting enough to make users accept it, but the recovery platform has strong independent function, big data manages and implements the efficient supervision of the recycling process, and the standard of transaction price index makes the recovery price transparent and reliable. Off-line matching treatment system is perfect, and offline recycling transaction cost is low, so that the recycling process is controlled better. In the specific recovery effect, the intelligent recycling technology requires high standardization of products, which makes the variety of recycling relatively single. But the batch recovery and specialized treatment for various kinds of middlemen make their terminal treatment amount, energy saving and emission reduction remarkable, and the comprehensive practice effect is better. But at present, it is not suitable for the general promotion of recycling of renewable resources in many varieties and wide fields.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京物資學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F713.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周永生;高山;;創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動(dòng)下基于O2O視角的城市礦產(chǎn)“互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+回收”模式構(gòu)建研究[J];開發(fā)研究;2015年04期

2 倪元錦;;“互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+”再生資源回收模式拓展京城[J];中華環(huán)境;2015年07期

3 ;江蘇首創(chuàng)“e環(huán)�！ひ谆厥铡本G色循環(huán)模式電子廢棄物回收也來(lái)趕新潮[J];中國(guó)資源綜合利用;2015年06期

4 沖濤;;桑德再生資源O2O弄潮行業(yè)“互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+”藍(lán)海[J];資源再生;2015年05期

5 鄧旭;;“互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+回收”的新模式將促進(jìn)傳統(tǒng)回收行業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)——2015中國(guó)再生資源產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展論壇暨展品展示交易大會(huì)在長(zhǎng)沙開幕[J];資源再生;2015年04期

6 李春發(fā);韓芳旭;楊琪琪;;基于C2B的WEEE網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)回收模式及運(yùn)行機(jī)制分析[J];科技管理研究;2015年06期

7 張茹秀;;基于生態(tài)效益的閉環(huán)供應(yīng)鏈回收模式分析[J];科技管理研究;2014年23期

8 周燕;;對(duì)我國(guó)可再生資源回收利用模式的探索——以有色金屬為例[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者;2014年14期

9 周漢城;;改造集散市場(chǎng) 建設(shè)新型再生資源回收利用體系[J];再生資源與循環(huán)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年04期

10 劉國(guó)秋;黃小勇;賈揚(yáng)蕾;;循環(huán)共生經(jīng)濟(jì)下包裝物逆向物流回收模式研究[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前5條

1 張聰;;廢品回收要建“淘寶網(wǎng)”？[N];中國(guó)環(huán)境報(bào);2015年

2 張成;唐艷菊;;“互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+回收”回收也可以很時(shí)尚[N];中華合作時(shí)報(bào);2015年

3 陳若然;;移動(dòng)互聯(lián)助垃圾回收變商機(jī)[N];南方日?qǐng)?bào);2015年

4 徐衛(wèi)星;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)思維打通回收“痛點(diǎn)”[N];中國(guó)環(huán)境報(bào);2014年

5 張意軒;王舒懷;;中國(guó)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)遭遇創(chuàng)新隱憂？[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 徐建平;再生資源回收利用網(wǎng)絡(luò)研究[D];東華大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 王愛(ài)珍;EPR下電子產(chǎn)品的逆向物流回收模式及供應(yīng)商評(píng)價(jià)[D];重慶交通大學(xué);2014年

2 孟燕莎;基于不同回收模式的閉環(huán)供應(yīng)鏈?zhǔn)找鎱f(xié)調(diào)研究[D];天津大學(xué);2014年

3 李t-t-;基于創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動(dòng)的湖北省再生資源產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展模式研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2013年

4 李文君;循環(huán)經(jīng)濟(jì)下的再生資源回收體系物流網(wǎng)絡(luò)構(gòu)建研究[D];重慶交通大學(xué);2013年

5 林友楷;再生資源回收利用網(wǎng)絡(luò)運(yùn)營(yíng)模式研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2013年

6 張煒一;O2O電子商務(wù)模式下中國(guó)大眾用戶接受行為影響因素探究[D];北京郵電大學(xué);2013年

7 吳鳳娟;面向低碳的網(wǎng)絡(luò)回收車輛路徑問(wèn)題研究[D];天津大學(xué);2012年

8 陳冰冰;模糊環(huán)境下廢舊家電產(chǎn)品回收網(wǎng)絡(luò)設(shè)計(jì)[D];中南大學(xué);2012年

9 郭玉堂;B2C電子商務(wù)模式下顧客感知價(jià)值、顧客滿意與顧客忠誠(chéng)關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2012年

10 張弛;鄭州市再生資源回收物流網(wǎng)絡(luò)優(yōu)化研究[D];河南工業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1777204