本文關(guān)鍵詞： 裝備制造業(yè) 生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè) 產(chǎn)業(yè)融合度　出處：《山西財經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：裝備制造業(yè)與生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)有著天然的關(guān)聯(lián)關(guān)系。生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)作為中間投入性產(chǎn)業(yè),為裝備制造業(yè)的產(chǎn)品生產(chǎn)提供先進的技術(shù)與配套的服務(wù),同時為其提供產(chǎn)后的市場營銷、物流運輸、產(chǎn)品保障等一體化服務(wù),降低裝備制造企業(yè)的制造及交易成本,促進產(chǎn)業(yè)的轉(zhuǎn)型與升級;而裝備制造業(yè)對生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)需求的不斷增加會提高生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的技術(shù)與服務(wù)創(chuàng)新水平,以便更好的為裝備制造企業(yè)提供先進技術(shù)與服務(wù)。因此,裝備制造業(yè)與生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)融合發(fā)展能夠推動裝備制造業(yè)的轉(zhuǎn)型升級,促進生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的多樣化、多元化發(fā)展,同時帶給消費者更多的經(jīng)濟與社會效益。目前,已有文獻(xiàn)對兩大產(chǎn)業(yè)融合的研究大多是從理論層面展開的,主要是對兩大產(chǎn)業(yè)融合的發(fā)展理論、融合的基本模式、融合的路徑等方面的研究。在研究過程中對兩大產(chǎn)業(yè)的融合度測算、融合影響因素有所涉及,但是多數(shù)停留在定性分析的層面,少有做某一地區(qū)的產(chǎn)業(yè)融合度測算和關(guān)于影響機制的研究�；诖�,本文以陜西省的裝備制造業(yè)與生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)為研究對象,從以下兩個方面展開研究:首先,利用投入產(chǎn)出表中的影響力與感應(yīng)度系數(shù)對兩大產(chǎn)業(yè)間的關(guān)聯(lián)關(guān)系進行分析,在此基礎(chǔ)上采用灰色關(guān)聯(lián)度方法對陜西省兩大產(chǎn)業(yè)融合度水平進行測定,并分析陜西省兩大產(chǎn)業(yè)融合過程中可能存在問題。其次,根據(jù)產(chǎn)業(yè)融合存在的問題,建立產(chǎn)業(yè)融合度的影響因素指標(biāo)體系。利用主成分分析法將影響融合度的眾多因素劃分為三個主因子:融合的基礎(chǔ)因素、融合的條件因素以及融合的環(huán)境因素,并結(jié)合多元線性回歸模型分析這三個主因子對陜西省兩大產(chǎn)業(yè)融合度的影響差異。研究結(jié)果顯示:(1)融合的基礎(chǔ)因素、融合的條件因素、融合的環(huán)境因素對兩大產(chǎn)業(yè)的融合有正向推動作用。(2)三個主因子中融合的基礎(chǔ)因素(即產(chǎn)業(yè)的技術(shù)創(chuàng)新水平、研發(fā)資金投入、專業(yè)人才儲備)對融合度的影響是最大的,而裝備制造業(yè)與生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)在這幾大方面存在不足,導(dǎo)致兩大產(chǎn)業(yè)整體的融合水平不高。據(jù)此,文章對陜西省兩大產(chǎn)業(yè)融合發(fā)展提出對策建議,即:提升產(chǎn)業(yè)關(guān)鍵共性技術(shù)的創(chuàng)新水平;積極儲備專業(yè)技術(shù)人才;加大研發(fā)資金的投入;健全融合發(fā)展的政策與制度。
[Abstract]:As an intermediate input industry, the producer service industry provides advanced technology and supporting services for the production of equipment manufacturing industry, and provides postnatal marketing for the equipment manufacturing industry. Logistics, transportation, product support and other integrated services, reduce the manufacturing and transaction costs of equipment manufacturing enterprises, promote the transformation and upgrading of the industry; The increasing demand for producer services in the equipment manufacturing industry will improve the technological and service innovation level of producer services in order to better provide advanced technology and services for equipment manufacturing enterprises. The integration and development of equipment manufacturing and producer services can promote the transformation and upgrading of equipment manufacturing, promote the diversification and diversification of producer services, and at the same time bring more economic and social benefits to consumers. Most of the researches on the integration of the two industries have been carried out from the theoretical level, mainly on the development theory and the basic model of the integration of the two major industries. Research on the path of integration. In the course of the research, the factors affecting the integration of the two industries are involved, but most of them stay at the level of qualitative analysis. Based on this, this paper takes the equipment manufacturing industry and producer service industry in Shaanxi Province as the research object, and carries out the research from the following two aspects: first, Based on the analysis of the relationship between the two industries by using the influence and sensitivity coefficients in the input-output table, the level of financial integration between the two industries in Shaanxi Province is measured by using the grey correlation degree method. And analyzes the possible problems in the process of integration of the two major industries in Shaanxi Province. Secondly, according to the problems of industrial convergence, By using principal component analysis, many factors affecting the degree of financial integration are divided into three main factors: the basic factors of integration, the conditions of integration and the environmental factors of integration. Combined with the multivariate linear regression model, this paper analyzes the difference between the three main factors on the integration degree of the two major industries in Shaanxi Province. The results show that the basic factors and the conditions of the integration are the basic factors and the conditions of the integration of the two major industries in Shaanxi Province. Among the three main factors, the level of technological innovation, the investment of R & D, and the reserve of professional talents have the greatest influence on the degree of integration. However, the equipment manufacturing industry and producer service industry are deficient in these aspects, resulting in a low level of integration of the two industries as a whole. Accordingly, the paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions for the integration and development of the two major industries in Shaanxi Province. That is, to improve the innovation level of key common technologies in industry; to actively reserve professional and technical personnel; to increase the investment of R & D funds; to improve the policies and systems of integration and development.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F426;F719

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 崔莉;;基于VAR模型西部地區(qū)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)互動融合評價[J];學(xué)術(shù)論壇;2016年04期

2 陳俊紅;孫明德;余軍;;北京市鄉(xiāng)村旅游產(chǎn)業(yè)融合度測算及影響因素分析[J];湖北農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2016年09期

3 盧方元;常艷華;盧欣;;中國裝備制造業(yè)R&D投入產(chǎn)出績效分析——基于全國三次經(jīng)濟普查[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟;2016年04期

4 聞乃荻;綦良群;;知識密集型服務(wù)業(yè)與裝備制造業(yè)互動融合過程及影響因素研究[J];科技與管理;2016年02期

5 李逢春;周子元;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對先進制造業(yè)的捕捉與匹配問題研究——基于反應(yīng)與擴散模型的研究方法[J];南京財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2015年06期

6 尹洪濤;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)融合的主要價值增值點[J];管理學(xué)報;2015年08期

7 寧進;;中國裝備制造業(yè)服務(wù)化轉(zhuǎn)型的路徑因子及其績效實證[J];求索;2015年05期

8 綦良群;闞鍇;;區(qū)域裝備制造業(yè)與生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)互動融合政策評估分析[J];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2015年03期

9 林桂軍;何武;;中國裝備制造業(yè)在全球價值鏈的地位及升級趨勢[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2015年04期

10 王成東;綦良群;蔡淵淵;;裝備制造業(yè)與生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)融合影響因素研究[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟;2015年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 朱海艷;旅游產(chǎn)業(yè)融合模式研究[D];西北大學(xué);2014年

2 王成東;我國裝備制造業(yè)與生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)融合機理及保障策略研究[D];哈爾濱理工大學(xué);2014年

3 姜睿清;基于產(chǎn)業(yè)融合的江西農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2013年

4 楊仁發(fā);生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展、制造業(yè)競爭力與產(chǎn)業(yè)融合[D];南開大學(xué);2013年

5 肖建勇;飯店產(chǎn)業(yè)融合的機理、路徑與風(fēng)險研究[D];華僑大學(xué);2012年

6 單元媛;高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)融合成長研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2010年

7 梁偉軍;農(nóng)業(yè)與相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)融合發(fā)展研究[D];華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

8 鄭明高;產(chǎn)業(yè)融合發(fā)展研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2010年

9 胡金星;產(chǎn)業(yè)融合的內(nèi)在機制研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2007年

10 胡永佳;產(chǎn)業(yè)融合的經(jīng)濟學(xué)分析[D];中共中央黨校;2007年

，

本文編號：1483579