【摘要】：隨著旅游業(yè)的快速發(fā)展并成為城鎮(zhèn)化的主要驅(qū)動(dòng)力之一,研究其對(duì)鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)空間的生產(chǎn)具有重要意義。采用訪談法與觀察法,以北京司馬臺(tái)村和陜西袁家村為例,基于列斐伏爾的空間三元辯證框架構(gòu)建了旅游發(fā)展對(duì)鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)空間生產(chǎn)影響的分析框架,并據(jù)此對(duì)比了開發(fā)商主導(dǎo)模式和村集體主導(dǎo)模式下的不同影響。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn):旅游發(fā)展對(duì)鄉(xiāng)村物質(zhì)空間、經(jīng)濟(jì)收益、社會(huì)關(guān)系和權(quán)力結(jié)構(gòu)等方面產(chǎn)生了一定影響;開發(fā)商主導(dǎo)模式下缺乏對(duì)原住民生活空間的有效管理,造成了空間不平等;村集體主導(dǎo)模式下經(jīng)濟(jì)效益共享機(jī)制和社會(huì)關(guān)系網(wǎng)絡(luò)得到良性發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of tourism and become one of the main driving forces of urbanization, it is of great significance to study the production of rural social space. Taking Simatai Village in Beijing and Yuan Jia Village in Shaanxi Province as examples, this paper constructs an analytical framework of the impact of tourism development on rural social spatial production based on the three-dimensional dialectical framework of Lefeivot, using the methods of interview and observation, and taking Simatai Village in Beijing and Yuan Jia Village in Shaanxi Province as examples. Based on this, the author contrasts the different influence between the dominant mode of developer and the mode of village collective. The results show that tourism development has a certain impact on rural material space, economic benefits, social relations and power structure, the lack of effective management of Aboriginal living space under the dominant mode of developers, resulting in spatial inequality; Under the village collective leading mode, the economic benefit sharing mechanism and the social relation network have been well developed.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)城市與環(huán)境學(xué)院旅游研究與規(guī)劃中心;
【基金】：國家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“城郊旅游綜合體(TCAC)形成機(jī)制與發(fā)展模式研究”(41271151)資助
【分類號(hào)】：F327;F592.7

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 王柯敏;;新型農(nóng)村科技服務(wù)體系發(fā)展的主導(dǎo)模式研究[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 上海市農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)推廣服務(wù)中心;按市場(chǎng)化主導(dǎo)模式做好有機(jī)肥推廣[N];東方城鄉(xiāng)報(bào);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2467310