發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-04-10 06:31

【摘要】：本文主要研究的是京津冀區(qū)域旅游一體化程度的評(píng)價(jià)。需要解決的問(wèn)題包括:1.確定評(píng)級(jí)評(píng)價(jià)區(qū)域旅游一體化的指標(biāo),各指標(biāo)是怎樣反映區(qū)域旅游一體化程度的。本文選取了區(qū)域旅游收入離散指數(shù)、區(qū)域游客數(shù)量離散指數(shù)、A級(jí)景區(qū)密度變異系數(shù)以及區(qū)域交通可達(dá)性作為評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo);2.確定各個(gè)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)在評(píng)級(jí)模型中的所占的權(quán)重,本文應(yīng)用層次分析法,通過(guò)調(diào)查問(wèn)卷的方式獲取數(shù)據(jù);3.構(gòu)建評(píng)級(jí)區(qū)域旅游一體化程度的模型,最后對(duì)2005-2015年京津冀區(qū)域旅游一體化程度的趨勢(shì)變化進(jìn)行分析,并給出京津冀區(qū)域旅游一體化發(fā)展的建議。論文的主要結(jié)論包括以下幾個(gè)方面:(1)各個(gè)評(píng)價(jià)因子與區(qū)域旅游一體化程度的關(guān)系:區(qū)域旅游收入離散指數(shù)反映了一個(gè)區(qū)域旅游發(fā)展的總體協(xié)調(diào)程度。該指標(biāo)值越小,區(qū)域內(nèi)旅游業(yè)發(fā)展水平較接近,區(qū)域旅游合作較好,即區(qū)域旅游一體化程度較高;區(qū)域游客數(shù)量離散指數(shù)數(shù)值越小,區(qū)域游客數(shù)量越協(xié)調(diào),區(qū)域內(nèi)各個(gè)地區(qū)旅游吸引力差距越小,旅游一體化水平越高;A級(jí)景區(qū)密度的變異系數(shù)越大,表明京津冀A級(jí)景區(qū)分布差異越大,景區(qū)的分布越集中,該指標(biāo)值越小,區(qū)域旅游一體化程度較好;伴隨區(qū)域交通可達(dá)性的提高,區(qū)域內(nèi)各城市間互通有無(wú),不僅為游客在區(qū)域內(nèi)的流動(dòng)提供了良好的基礎(chǔ),還能夠促進(jìn)區(qū)域旅游一體化的發(fā)展;(2)得出各個(gè)指標(biāo)的演變趨勢(shì)如下結(jié):從趨勢(shì)圖的走向,可以得出近11年間,京津冀區(qū)域旅游業(yè)發(fā)展水平差距在越來(lái)越小,在向著均衡良好的方向發(fā)展;京津冀區(qū)域游客數(shù)量差距在越來(lái)越小,區(qū)域內(nèi)各個(gè)地區(qū)的旅游吸引力在向著均衡協(xié)調(diào)良好的方向發(fā)展;京津冀區(qū)域A級(jí)景區(qū)密度的變異系數(shù)越來(lái)越小,區(qū)域內(nèi)A級(jí)景區(qū)的分布向著均衡良好的方向發(fā)展,但是,從具體數(shù)值上看,京津冀區(qū)域A級(jí)景區(qū)分布非常集中,不利于區(qū)域旅游一體化的提高;京津冀交通可達(dá)性在逐年提高;(3)2005年至2012年,京津冀區(qū)域旅游一體化程度數(shù)值處于0-0.4之間,根據(jù)區(qū)域旅游一體化階段劃分,京津冀區(qū)域旅游一體化處于起步階段,也就是僅僅提出了區(qū)域的旅游合作,但是并沒(méi)有實(shí)質(zhì)性的合作行動(dòng);2013年至2015年,京津冀區(qū)域旅游一體化程度數(shù)值處于0.4-0.6之間,根據(jù)區(qū)域旅游一體化階段劃分,京津冀區(qū)域旅游一體化處于早期發(fā)展階段,即只是在旅游線路規(guī)劃等方面進(jìn)行了一些基礎(chǔ)合作�？傊�,近11年間京津冀區(qū)域旅游一體化程度在穩(wěn)定的推進(jìn),但是,目前京津冀區(qū)域旅游一體化的發(fā)展仍不夠成熟,三地需要繼續(xù)深化協(xié)作,推進(jìn)一體化的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly studies the evaluation of regional tourism integration degree in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. The problems that need to be addressed include: 1. Determine the evaluation index of regional tourism integration, and how each index reflects the degree of regional tourism integration. In this paper, the discrete index of regional tourism income, the discrete index of regional tourist number, the coefficient of density variation of class A scenic spot and the regional traffic reachability are selected as the evaluation indexes. To determine the weight of each evaluation index in the rating model, this paper uses the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to obtain the data through the way of questionnaire; In the end, the trend of regional tourism integration in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from 2005 to 2015 is analyzed, and some suggestions for the development of regional tourism integration in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region are given. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows: (1) the relationship between each evaluation factor and the degree of regional tourism integration: the discrete index of regional tourism income reflects the overall coordination degree of a regional tourism development. The smaller the index value is, the closer the level of tourism development in the region is, and the better regional tourism cooperation is, that is, the higher degree of regional tourism integration; The smaller the discrete index of the number of regional tourists, the more coordinated the number of regional tourists, the smaller the regional tourism attraction gap, the higher the level of tourism integration; The greater the coefficient of variation of the density of A-class scenic spots, the greater the distribution difference of the A-class scenic spots in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, the more concentrated the scenic spots distribution, the smaller the index value, and the better the regional tourism integration degree; With the improvement of regional traffic accessibility, the intercommunion of the cities in the region not only provides a good basis for the flow of tourists in the region, but also promotes the development of regional tourism integration. (2) the evolution trend of each index is concluded as follows: from the trend map, it can be concluded that in the last 11 years, the gap of tourism development level in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region is getting smaller and smaller, and it is developing towards a balanced and good direction; The difference of tourist quantity in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region is getting smaller and smaller, and the tourist attraction of each region in the region is developing towards a balanced and harmonious direction. The coefficient of variation of A-level scenic spots in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region is getting smaller and smaller, and the distribution of A-level scenic spots in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region is developing towards a well-balanced direction. However, in terms of specific values, the distribution of A-level scenic spots in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region is very concentrated. It is not conducive to the improvement of regional tourism integration; The accessibility of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei traffic is increasing year by year; (3) from 2005 to 2012, the value of regional tourism integration in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region is between 0 and 0.4. According to the division of regional tourism integration stage, the regional tourism integration in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region is in the initial stage. That is, only put forward the regional tourism cooperation, but there is no substantive cooperative action; From 2013 to 2015, the value of regional tourism integration in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region is between 0.4 and 0.6. According to the division of regional tourism integration stage, the regional tourism integration in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region is in the early stage of development. That is, only in the tourism route planning and other aspects of some basic cooperation. In short, the degree of regional tourism integration in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region has been steadily promoted in the last 11 years. However, the development of regional tourism integration in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region is still not mature enough, and the three places need to continue to deepen cooperation and promote the development of integration.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F592.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王娟;;基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施對(duì)新絲綢之路經(jīng)濟(jì)帶區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化的影響——基于空間面板杜賓模型的研究[J];學(xué)術(shù)論壇;2015年11期

2 鄧延平;;區(qū)位理論發(fā)展、評(píng)述及其應(yīng)用[J];商;2015年29期

3 盛斌;;區(qū)域一體化亟待建立新型經(jīng)濟(jì)合作體系[J];中國(guó)投資;2015年08期

4 林磊;;關(guān)于區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)效應(yīng)分析研究[J];中國(guó)市場(chǎng);2015年30期

5 羅能生;羅小梅;;交通便捷性對(duì)我國(guó)區(qū)域市場(chǎng)一體化影響的實(shí)證研究[J];湖湘論壇;2015年04期

6 陳曉永;陰明州;;區(qū)域旅游發(fā)展協(xié)同度分析及評(píng)價(jià)模型構(gòu)建——基于京津冀一體化的視角[J];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(綜合版);2015年01期

7 黃莉蘋;侯學(xué)鋼;;京津冀旅游交通一體化的協(xié)同發(fā)展芻議[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2015年01期

8 徐虹;秦達(dá)郅;;我國(guó)區(qū)域旅游一體化發(fā)展比較研究——以京津冀和長(zhǎng)三角旅游區(qū)為例[J];天津商業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2015年01期

9 吉曉靜;;同城化背景下寧鎮(zhèn)揚(yáng)區(qū)域旅游一體化研究[J];太原城市職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年12期

10 陳繼祥;王芳;蔣祥龍;王琴;;皖北區(qū)域旅游一體化信息服務(wù)平臺(tái)的構(gòu)建[J];西昌學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2014年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 吳國(guó)清;;基于區(qū)域旅游一體化的城市旅游資源整合[N];中國(guó)旅游報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 鄧煥彬;珠三角區(qū)域一體化下交通協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展研究[D];清華大學(xué);2012年

2 徐境;呼包鄂區(qū)域一體化發(fā)展模式及空間規(guī)劃策略研究[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 張延偉;京津冀旅游一體化發(fā)展研究[D];河北大學(xué);2015年

2 高美麗;呼倫貝爾市旅游一體化發(fā)展研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué);2014年

3 柳晨靜;基于可拓工程法的冀中南區(qū)域旅游一體化研究[D];燕山大學(xué);2013年

4 呂典瑋;京津冀區(qū)域一體化中市場(chǎng)一體化研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2011年

5 黃泓杰;環(huán)渤海區(qū)域旅游一體化研究[D];沈陽(yáng)大學(xué);2011年

6 安傳艷;中原城市群旅游一體化研究[D];河南大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2455555