【摘要】：H指數(shù)作為評價研究者學(xué)術(shù)影響力的參考依據(jù)得到了學(xué)界的廣泛認(rèn)可。文章在H指數(shù)的基礎(chǔ)上,引入時間因素,構(gòu)建Ht指數(shù),對CNKI數(shù)據(jù)庫中1994—2014年旅游研究領(lǐng)域129位學(xué)者的引文數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計分析,測度了我國旅游研究者的學(xué)術(shù)影響力,在此基礎(chǔ)上探討了我國旅游學(xué)科發(fā)展的趨勢。研究結(jié)果表明,在考慮時間因素的情況下,我國旅游研究者Ht指數(shù)普遍低于H指數(shù);20世紀(jì)60年代出生的旅游研究者是當(dāng)前我國旅游學(xué)術(shù)研究領(lǐng)域中的中堅力量,擁有較為顯著的學(xué)術(shù)影響力;職稱、高校層次等對我國旅游研究者Ht指數(shù)有著顯著的影響。Ht指數(shù)與H指數(shù)的對比可以反映出旅游學(xué)術(shù)研究特定領(lǐng)域變化,其中,旅游規(guī)劃與設(shè)計、旅游地理學(xué)和旅游管理學(xué)等一直是旅游領(lǐng)域的研究熱點(diǎn),而旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)等也日益受到研究者的關(guān)注。
[Abstract]:H index as a reference for evaluating the academic influence of researchers has been widely recognized by academic circles. On the basis of H index, this paper introduces time factor, constructs Ht index, analyzes the citation data of 129 scholars in tourism research field from 1994 to 2014 in CNKI database, and measures the academic influence of tourism researchers in China. On this basis, the development trend of tourism discipline in China is discussed. The results show that the Ht index of tourism researchers in China is generally lower than that of tourism researchers born in the 1960s, which is the main force in the field of tourism academic research in China. The comparison between Ht index and H index can reflect the changes in specific fields of tourism academic research. Tourism planning and design, tourism geography and tourism management have been the research hotspot in tourism field, and tourism economics has been paid more and more attention by researchers.
【作者單位】： 華東師范大學(xué)工商管理學(xué)院;
【分類號】：F590;G353.1
，

本文編號：2167131