本文選題：空間錯位 + 旅游資源　； 參考：《生態(tài)經(jīng)濟》2014年04期

【摘要】：以我國東、西部22個省(市、區(qū))為研究對象,利用重力模型和旅游空間錯位指數(shù)模型分析東、西部兩個區(qū)域旅游資源、旅游人力資本和旅游收入之間的空間錯位現(xiàn)象。研究結果表明:(1)旅游收入指數(shù)和旅游人力資本指數(shù)的重心偏向東部地區(qū),旅游資源豐度指數(shù)的重心偏向西部地區(qū);(2)東、西部各省(市、區(qū))均存在不同程度的空間錯位現(xiàn)象,其中北京、天津、上海、江蘇、福建、廣東、四川、貴州、云南和陜西10個省(市)存在負向錯位,其余12省(市、區(qū))存在正向錯位;(3)根據(jù)錯位程度的不同,東、西部22個省(市、區(qū))分別處于高錯位區(qū)、中錯位區(qū)和低錯位區(qū)。
[Abstract]:Taking 22 provinces (cities and districts) in the east and west of China as the research object, the spatial dislocation between tourism resources, tourism human capital and tourism income in eastern and western regions is analyzed by using gravity model and tourism spatial dislocation index model. The results show that the center of gravity of the tourism income index and the tourism human capital index is inclined to the eastern region, the center of gravity of the tourism resources abundance index is to the west region, and the western provinces (cities and regions) have different degrees of spatial dislocation. Among them, 10 provinces (cities) in Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Fujian, Guangdong, Sichuan, Guizhou, Yunnan, and Shaanxi have negative dislocation, while the remaining 12 provinces (cities, districts) have positive mismatches. The western 22 provinces (cities and districts) are located in the high dislocation area, the middle dislocation area and the low dislocation area respectively.
【作者單位】： 燕山大學經(jīng)濟與管理學院;
【基金】：河北省高等學校自然科學重點研究項目(ZD20131021)
【分類號】：F592.7

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 丁旭生;李永文;呂可文;;基于空間錯位理論的河南省旅游發(fā)展區(qū)域差異研究[J];地理與地理信息科學;2011年02期

2 朱z，

本文編號：1901001