本文選題：旅游生態(tài)足跡　切入點(diǎn)：旅游生態(tài)效率　出處：《四川師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：生態(tài)足跡法以土地面積為基礎(chǔ),定量測算人類對自然的生態(tài)消耗和評價(jià)人類發(fā)展是否可持續(xù);它適用范圍非常廣,如果將其應(yīng)用于旅游業(yè),則就是旅游生態(tài)足跡。在旅游業(yè)蓬勃發(fā)展的背后所隱藏的負(fù)面效應(yīng)也逐漸顯現(xiàn)。作為國家新生“5A”級旅游地的閬中古城旅游業(yè)的發(fā)展是否可持續(xù),目前還有待研究。本文運(yùn)用旅游生態(tài)足跡理論選取閬中市作為研究對象,從旅游交通、旅游住宿、旅游餐飲、旅游娛樂、旅游觀光和購物六個方面對閬中市2009—2015年的旅游生態(tài)足跡進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的實(shí)證分析研究,通過研究得出如下幾條結(jié)論:(1)閬中市旅游生態(tài)足跡的總量和人均足跡都隨著時間的變化呈上升趨勢,2015年旅游足跡總量為2009年足跡總量的3.5倍,人均旅游生態(tài)足跡2015年約為2009年的1.1倍。研究期間一直處于生態(tài)赤字狀態(tài),且赤字量在不斷增大,處于不可持續(xù)的發(fā)展?fàn)顟B(tài)。但通過與桂林、都江堰等不同地區(qū)進(jìn)行橫向?qū)Ρ?發(fā)現(xiàn)閬中市的人均旅游生態(tài)足跡相對較低,說明閬中市目前的旅游環(huán)境相對較好。(2)從2009—2015年七年時間里閬中市旅游交通比重最大,約占各年旅游生態(tài)足跡總量的50%,是旅游生態(tài)足跡的主要組成部分;購物和餐飲足跡分別排在第二和第三,然后是旅游住宿,娛樂和觀光足跡位居第五、六位。從閬中市六種類型旅游土地的足跡來看,化石能源地比重最大,然后依次是建成地、草地、耕地、水域,林地;其中林地為零�？偟穆糜纬休d力有所提高,但總的人均生態(tài)赤字仍然呈上升趨勢,赤字量從2009年的4.948×10-4hm2/人增加到2015年的91.051×10-4hm2/人,人均增量為86.103×10-4hm2/人。在六種類型土地中,各年的草地和化石能源地均出現(xiàn)生態(tài)赤字,化石能源地赤字最為嚴(yán)重,且二者赤字量越來越大,隨時間呈上升趨勢;耕地從2015年開始出現(xiàn)生態(tài)赤字,其余土地尚有生態(tài)盈余。(3)閬中市旅游生態(tài)承載力與旅游生態(tài)足跡在土地類型上存在不匹配的現(xiàn)象,即承載力大的土地,足跡需求小;而承載力小的土地,足跡需求大。(4)研究期間閬中市各年生態(tài)效率中2014年最高為44873元/hm2,在時間序列上旅游生態(tài)效率七年期間變化較小,上升趨勢不明顯。通過與桂林、臺灣、中國和世界平均水平等對比分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)閬中市的旅游生態(tài)效率還是相對較低。(5)通過分析閬中市旅游生態(tài)足跡,發(fā)現(xiàn)決定其大小的關(guān)鍵因素有:游客出行方式、飲食消費(fèi)結(jié)構(gòu)、住宿設(shè)施的數(shù)量和檔次、游客數(shù)量、旅行距離、停留時間和當(dāng)?shù)赝恋氐纳a(chǎn)力等因素。
[Abstract]:The ecological footprint method, which is based on the land area, quantitatively measures the ecological consumption of nature and evaluates the sustainability of human development. This is the ecological footprint of tourism. The hidden negative effects behind the vigorous development of tourism also gradually appear. As a new "5A" class tourist destination of the country, Langzhong ancient city tourism development is sustainable or not. This paper chooses Langzhong City as the object of study, from the aspects of tourism transportation, tourist accommodation, tourism catering, tourism entertainment, tourism ecological footprint theory. The tourism ecological footprint of Langzhong city from 2009 to 2015 is studied in detail from six aspects of tourism and shopping. The conclusions are as follows: (1) the total tourism ecological footprint and the per capita footprint of Langzhong City increase with time, and the total tourism footprint in 2015 is 3.5 times of the total footprint in 2009. The per capita tourism ecological footprint in 2015 is about 1.1 times that of 2009. During the study period, it has been in a state of ecological deficit, and the deficit is constantly increasing, and it is in an unsustainable state of development. But through horizontal comparisons with different regions such as Guilin and Dujiangyan, It is found that the per capita ecological footprint of Langzhong tourism is relatively low, which indicates that Langzhong has a relatively good tourism environment at present) in the seven years from 2009-2015, Langzhong had the largest proportion of tourism transportation. Accounting for about 50 percent of the total tourism ecological footprint in each year, it is the main component of the tourism ecological footprint. Shopping and catering are ranked second and third respectively, followed by tourist accommodation, entertainment and tourism. According to the footprint of six types of tourist land in Langzhong City, fossil energy land has the largest proportion, followed by completed land, grassland, cultivated land, water area and woodland, in which the forest land is zero, and the total tourism carrying capacity has been increased. However, the total per capita ecological deficit is still on the rise, from 4.948 脳 10-4hm2/ in 2009 to 91.051 脳 10-4hm2/ in 2015, and the per capita increase is 86.103 脳 10-4hm2/. Among the six types of land, there are ecological deficits in grassland and fossil energy land in every year. The deficit of fossil energy land is the most serious, and the deficit between them is getting bigger and larger, which is on the rise over time. The cultivated land has been in ecological deficit since 2015. In Langzhong City, there is a mismatch between the ecological carrying capacity of tourism and the ecological footprint of tourism, that is, the land with large carrying capacity has a small footprint, and the land with small carrying capacity has less footprint. During the study period, the maximum ecological efficiency of Langzhong city in 2014 was 44873 yuan / hm ~ (2). In time series, the change of ecological efficiency of tourism in seven years was relatively small, but the trend of rising was not obvious. With Guilin, Taiwan, Through the analysis of Langzhong's tourism ecological footprint, it is found that the key factors determining its size are: tourist travel mode, diet consumption structure. Factors such as the number and level of accommodation, number of visitors, travel distance, length of stay and productivity of local land.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：X22;F592.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐中民,陳東景,張志強(qiáng),程國棟;中國1999年的生態(tài)足跡分析[J];土壤學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期

2 徐中民,張志強(qiáng),程國棟,陳東景;中國1999年生態(tài)足跡計(jì)算與發(fā)展能力分析[J];應(yīng)用生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

3 王書華,毛漢英,王忠靜;生態(tài)足跡研究的國內(nèi)外近期進(jìn)展[J];自然資源學(xué)報(bào);2002年06期

4 李金平,王志石;澳門2001年生態(tài)足跡分析[J];自然資源學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

5 席建超,葛全勝,成升魁,魯春霞;旅游消費(fèi)生態(tài)占用初探——以北京市海外入境旅游者為例[J];自然資源學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

6 蘇筠,成升魁,謝高地;大城市居民生活消費(fèi)的生態(tài)占用初探——對北京、上海的案例研究[J];資源科學(xué);2001年06期

7 謝高地,魯春霞,成升魁,鄭度;中國的生態(tài)空間占用研究[J];資源科學(xué);2001年06期

8 白艷瑩,王效科,歐陽志云,苗鴻;蘇錫常地區(qū)生態(tài)足跡分析[J];資源科學(xué);2003年06期

9 徐中民,張志強(qiáng),程國棟;甘肅省1998年生態(tài)足跡計(jì)算與分析[J];地理學(xué)報(bào);2000年05期

10 張志強(qiáng),徐中民,程國棟,陳東景;中國西部12省(區(qū)市)的生態(tài)足跡[J];地理學(xué)報(bào);2001年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 呂文;;“十三五”旅游業(yè)發(fā)展規(guī)劃首次納入國家重點(diǎn)專項(xiàng)規(guī)劃[N];中國旅游報(bào);2016年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 戶朝雪;崆山白云洞風(fēng)景區(qū)旅游生態(tài)足跡研究[D];河北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

2 閻競軻;基于生態(tài)足跡模型的湘西州旅游業(yè)可持續(xù)發(fā)展研究[D];吉首大學(xué);2015年

3 何歡;上海市旅游生態(tài)足跡評價(jià)分析[D];上海師范大學(xué);2013年

4 張約翰;西寧市旅游業(yè)生態(tài)足跡與可持續(xù)發(fā)展研究[D];青海師范大學(xué);2009年

5 羅佳;九江市旅游生態(tài)足跡分析與研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2008年

6 鄭宇;都江堰市旅游生態(tài)足跡研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2008年

7 韋達(dá);旅游者生態(tài)足跡比較分析[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1674442