本文關(guān)鍵詞：中國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生績(jī)效考核研究系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

中國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生績(jī)效考核研究系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)

The Systematic Review of Performance Evaluation of Public Health Service in China

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

ZHAO Zhi - guang, HOU Wan - li, XU Shu -le, et al.（ Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen 518055, China）

廣東省深圳市疾病預(yù)防控制中心,518055

文章摘要：目的：總結(jié)我國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生績(jī)效考核研究現(xiàn)狀，為公共衛(wèi)生機(jī)構(gòu)改革和績(jī)效工資實(shí)施提供參考和借鑒。方法檢索中國(guó)知網(wǎng)等數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)，納入對(duì)公共衛(wèi)生機(jī)構(gòu)及社區(qū)衛(wèi)生服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)進(jìn)行績(jī)效考核的文獻(xiàn)，萃取考核主題、應(yīng)用理論、研究對(duì)象、研究方法等變量，進(jìn)行合并分析。結(jié)果共納入34項(xiàng)研究，，主要包括疾控機(jī)構(gòu)10項(xiàng)（29.4%），社區(qū)衛(wèi)生服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)16項(xiàng)（47.1%）。制定績(jī)效考核方案的方法以專家咨詢法為主（16項(xiàng)，61.5%）。機(jī)構(gòu)整體績(jī)效考核多（19項(xiàng)，73.1%），個(gè)人績(jī)效考核少（7項(xiàng)，26.9%）。社區(qū)衛(wèi)生服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)多應(yīng)用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)服務(wù)量理論（5項(xiàng)）進(jìn)行績(jī)效考核，而疾控機(jī)構(gòu)主要應(yīng)用“投入-產(chǎn)出”理論（2項(xiàng)）或是關(guān)鍵業(yè)績(jī)指標(biāo)理論（3項(xiàng)）以考核部分容易量化的業(yè)務(wù)工作。結(jié)論我國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生績(jī)效考核工作缺乏定量研究和客觀指標(biāo)，考核內(nèi)容尚不全面，個(gè)人績(jī)效考核研究亟待開展。

Abstr：To summarize the research condition of the performance evaluation of public health service in China,and to provide references for the reform of public health institutions and the implementation of performance pay. Methods Several databases such as Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched for literatures on studies related to performance evaluation of public health institutions and services,and extracted important variables such as theme,theory,subject and method,to conduct the pool-analysis. Results 34 studies were included,main including disease control agencies 10 studies （29.4%）,community health service institutions 16 studies（47.1%）. Expert consultation is the major method of performance evaluation planning（ 16,61.5%） with more institution evaluations（ 19,73.1%） and less individual evaluations（ 7, 26.9%）. The standardized workload measurement was the main theory for the performance evaluation of community health service institutions,while in disease control agencies input-output theory and Key Performance Indicators were the main theories for the performance evaluation of some jobs which were easily quantified. Conclusion The performance evaluation of public health service in China is lack of quantitative studies and objective indicators. The evaluation contents are far from comprehensive,and individual performance evaluation is urgent to be developed.

文章關(guān)鍵詞：

Keyword：:Public health Performance evaluation Systematic review

作者信息：會(huì)員可見

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：中國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生績(jī)效考核研究系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。