【摘要】：歷經(jīng)百年發(fā)展,城市文明化育下的奧運(yùn)會(huì)被賦予了更多的政治意涵、經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值和文化關(guān)切,儼然成為城市大事件。因?yàn)閵W林匹克公園開發(fā)的全過(guò)程(籌建、使用及賽后利用)均圍繞城市事件——奧運(yùn)會(huì)延展開來(lái),奧林匹克公園扮演著奧運(yùn)會(huì)與主辦城市之間最大交互平臺(tái)的角色,所以?shī)W林匹克公園自然成為奧運(yùn)會(huì)調(diào)整城市空間、集成城市功能、延續(xù)城市文脈的結(jié)點(diǎn)。在后奧運(yùn)時(shí)期,如何充分開掘蘊(yùn)藏于奧林匹克公園中的運(yùn)動(dòng)場(chǎng)館、開放綠地、寫字樓、展覽館、博物館、公共藝術(shù)中心、居住區(qū)等物質(zhì)資源,以及由跌宕起伏的賽時(shí)情感體驗(yàn)和賽后記憶所生發(fā)的場(chǎng)所感和認(rèn)同感為主體的精神資源,已成為破解城市開發(fā)的現(xiàn)實(shí)難關(guān)。本研究試圖借助城市設(shè)計(jì)理論工具,重構(gòu)奧林匹克公園開發(fā)的整體圖式。本研究運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)資料法、專家訪談法、邏輯分析法和個(gè)案研究法,得到如下結(jié)論： 1)奧林匹克公園開發(fā)和城市設(shè)計(jì)理論構(gòu)成了本研究的基本語(yǔ)境。奧林匹克公園開發(fā)是指從調(diào)整城市物質(zhì)空間、優(yōu)化集成城市功能、接續(xù)城市文脈等三維度,對(duì)奧林匹克公園這片公共游憩空間進(jìn)行開發(fā)的實(shí)踐過(guò)程。 2)追溯奧林匹克史,現(xiàn)存與在建奧林匹克公園共12個(gè)。其形成與演進(jìn)可分為5個(gè)時(shí)期：醞釀期、初步形成期、緩慢發(fā)展期、波動(dòng)發(fā)展期和穩(wěn)定發(fā)展期。 3)在調(diào)整物質(zhì)空間方面,奧林匹克公園開發(fā)包括選址、土地利用和空間結(jié)構(gòu)安排。將選址和土地利用捆綁,可總結(jié)出三種模式：一是選址市內(nèi),土地單一使用；二是選址市郊,非營(yíng)利性土地用途增加：三是選址市郊,土地混合使用�？臻g結(jié)構(gòu)分為傳統(tǒng)結(jié)構(gòu)組織模式和現(xiàn)代結(jié)構(gòu)組織模式。 4)在優(yōu)化集成城市功能方面,奧林匹克公園開發(fā)通過(guò)以運(yùn)動(dòng)休閑功能為核心,以游憩功能帶動(dòng)多種功能優(yōu)化配置來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)城市功能集成。公園多種功能優(yōu)化配置的途徑有：挖潛游憩功能是核心,開發(fā)商務(wù)功能是動(dòng)力,支持會(huì)展功能是保障,拓展居住功能是趨向。 5)在構(gòu)建“場(chǎng)所”、形成文脈方面,奧林匹克公園開發(fā)通過(guò)構(gòu)筑城市標(biāo)志物和構(gòu)筑文化教育場(chǎng)所,串聯(lián)城市歷史、現(xiàn)實(shí)與未來(lái),形成一條割不斷的城市文脈。 6)初步描繪奧林匹克公園開發(fā)的“應(yīng)然樣貌”——應(yīng)秉持整體觀、人文觀、發(fā)展觀,設(shè)立與自然和諧、與社會(huì)同步、與技術(shù)共生的日標(biāo),體現(xiàn)出土地混合使用、CBD-RBD融合發(fā)展和延續(xù)城市文脈的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)。 7)歷屆奧林匹克公園的開發(fā)利用等經(jīng)驗(yàn)將在更多城市落地,帶來(lái)城市開發(fā)的新理念和模式。
[Abstract]:After a hundred years of development, the Olympic Games, brought up by urban civilization, has been endowed with more political implications, economic values and cultural concerns, and has become a major urban event. Because the entire process of Olympic Park development (preparation, use and post-match utilization) extends around the city event-the Olympic Games, the Olympic Park acts as the largest platform for interaction between the Olympic Games and the host city. Therefore, the Olympic Park naturally becomes the node of the Olympic Games to adjust the urban space, integrate the urban functions and continue the urban context. In the post-Olympic period, how to fully excavate the material resources such as sports venues, open green spaces, office buildings, exhibition halls, museums, public art centers, residential areas and so on, which are contained in the Olympic Park, And the spiritual resources which are made by the emotional experience of the game time and the place feeling and identity created by the post-match memory have become the realistic difficulties in solving the urban development. This study attempts to reconstruct the overall schema of Olympic Park development with the aid of urban design theory tools. The main conclusions are as follows: 1) the development of Olympic Park and the theory of urban design constitute the basic context of this study. The development of Olympic Park refers to the three dimensions of adjusting the urban material space, optimizing the integration of urban functions, and continuing the context of the city. The practice of developing the public recreation space of the Olympic Park. 2) tracing back to the Olympic history, there are 12 Olympic parks in existence and under construction. Its formation and evolution can be divided into five periods: brewing period, initial forming period, slow developing period, fluctuating developing period and stable developing period. 3) in the aspect of adjusting material space, the development of Olympic Park includes site selection. Land use and spatial structure arrangement. The combination of site selection and land use can be summed up into three models: one is siting the city, the other is the single use of the land, the other is the location of the suburb, the increase of the non-profit land use, and the third is the location of the suburb, the mixed use of the land. The spatial structure is divided into the traditional structure organization mode and the modern structure organization mode. 4) in the aspect of optimizing the integrated city function, the Olympic Park develops by taking the sports and leisure function as the core. To realize the integration of urban functions, recreational functions can be used to optimize the allocation of various functions. The ways to optimize the allocation of various functions of the park are as follows: the recreational function of the park is the core, the function of developing business is the motive force, the function of supporting exhibition is the guarantee, and the function of expanding the living function is the trend. 5) in the aspect of constructing "place" and forming context, The development of the Olympic Park links the history, reality and future of the city through the construction of city markers and cultural and educational sites. Forming a continuous urban context. 6) A preliminary description of the "natural appearance" of the development of the Olympic Park should be based on a view of the whole, the humanities, the concept of development, the establishment of a day standard of harmony with nature, synchronization with society, and symbiosis with technology. The development of CBD-RBD and continuation of the development trend of urban context. 7) the development and utilization of previous Olympic Park will fall to the ground in more cities and bring new ideas and models of urban development.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京體育大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：TU986.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李建平;;奧林匹克公園與北京生態(tài)城市建設(shè)[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年02期

2 宋俊嶺;;現(xiàn)代化,城鎮(zhèn)化和城市學(xué)研究[J];北京社會(huì)科學(xué);1992年03期

3 劉宛;城市設(shè)計(jì)概念發(fā)展評(píng)述[J];城市規(guī)劃;2000年12期

4 唐子來(lái),付磊;發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家和地區(qū)的城市設(shè)計(jì)控制[J];城市規(guī)劃匯刊;2002年06期

5 季如進(jìn);李菁;李劍;;奧林匹克公園中心區(qū)賽后誰(shuí)來(lái)管——奧運(yùn)設(shè)施物業(yè)管理研究[J];中國(guó)房地產(chǎn);2008年03期

6 宋蓓;;從“大事件影響城市”談北京奧運(yùn)場(chǎng)館的賽后利用[J];北京規(guī)劃建設(shè);2009年02期

7 付思量;朱文一;;北京奧林匹克公園中心區(qū)城市活力研究[J];北京規(guī)劃建設(shè);2010年02期

8 保繼剛,古詩(shī)韻;城市RBD初步研究[J];規(guī)劃師;1998年04期

9 馮斐菲;融入城市肌理的奧運(yùn)舞臺(tái)——對(duì)北京奧林匹克公園規(guī)劃的思考與探討[J];規(guī)劃師;2003年06期

10 張燕玲;場(chǎng)所精神——以亞特蘭大百年奧林匹克公園為例[J];規(guī)劃師;2005年08期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 本報(bào)記者 林播;[N];中國(guó)房地產(chǎn)報(bào);2007年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 李學(xué)軍;體育館建筑結(jié)構(gòu)概念設(shè)計(jì)研究[D];北京工業(yè)大學(xué);2005年

2 胡振宇;現(xiàn)代城市體育設(shè)施建設(shè)與城市發(fā)展研究[D];東南大學(xué);2006年

3 任磊;百年奧運(yùn)建筑[D];同濟(jì)大學(xué);2006年

4 馮維波;城市游憩空間分析與整合研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2007年

5 樊可;多元視角下的體育建筑研究[D];同濟(jì)大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2211357