本文關鍵詞： 典型區(qū) 入境旅游 差異 對比分析　出處：《陜西師范大學》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：區(qū)域差異是區(qū)域經(jīng)濟發(fā)展中所存在的一種普遍現(xiàn)象,而作為區(qū)域經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的重要組成部分,區(qū)域旅游發(fā)展差異同樣是客觀普遍存在的,其存在和變化又將對經(jīng)濟、社會、環(huán)境等產(chǎn)生多方面復雜的影響,總的來講既有積極的意義,也有消極的影響。隨著中國旅游業(yè)的迅速發(fā)展,旅游業(yè)的區(qū)域差異已經(jīng)日益明顯,由此而產(chǎn)生的問題和負面影響將阻礙中國旅游業(yè)的持續(xù)、健康發(fā)展,因此,對區(qū)域旅游差異的深入分析及研究就成為當前旅游領域的一種必然選擇。 目前國內(nèi)外對區(qū)域旅游發(fā)展的研究大多集中在區(qū)域旅游資源的開發(fā)與管理,市場的營銷和開拓等方面,而對區(qū)域之間旅游發(fā)展的差異進行對比研究的較少,且往往研究的空間尺度比較單一,大多研究僅僅針對旅游發(fā)展差異的某一方面進行分析比較,研究內(nèi)容不夠全面；研究方法也僅僅局限在定性研究或簡單描述性統(tǒng)計分析上,在此基礎上進行的研究,結(jié)論缺乏說服力,研究結(jié)果片面化,因此現(xiàn)實指導意義不大。 本文依托國家自然科學基金項目《中國典型區(qū)域入境旅游流東-西遞進空間演化機理研究》,選取中國六大典型旅游區(qū)做為研究區(qū)域范圍,以六大典型旅游區(qū)所轄的17個旅游省市做為分析比較對象,采用理論與實證相結(jié)合,定性研究與定量研究相結(jié)合的方法,客觀、準確、全面地對中國六大典型區(qū)入境旅游發(fā)展的時空差異進行分析,以期尋求縮小區(qū)域旅游發(fā)展差異并促進其整體協(xié)調(diào)、持續(xù)、健康發(fā)展的路徑,通過此種深層次對比分析為中國六大典型區(qū)旅游的發(fā)展提供理論指導和科學依據(jù)。 本文的研究內(nèi)容主要有以下四個方面：一是介紹入境旅游差異的研究意義,國內(nèi)外對區(qū)域差異研究的現(xiàn)狀；二是界定中國入境旅游典型區(qū),并確定中國入境旅游差異對比研究的空間范圍；三是從宏觀、中觀和微觀的角度,采用不同的差異指標對六大典型區(qū)所轄的17個省市做了對比分析,從區(qū)域角度出發(fā),得出近年來中國入境旅游差異在不同尺度下的變化趨勢和特征；四是提出了提升中國入境旅游持續(xù)、健康、穩(wěn)定發(fā)展的策略和建議。 通過對六大典型旅游區(qū)所轄17個省市的不同尺度下和不同指標的對比分析下,本文主要得出以下幾點結(jié)論： (1)東西旅游帶間旅游外匯收入發(fā)展水平的絕對差異迅速擴大,而相對差異在緩慢上升。六大典型區(qū)區(qū)域內(nèi)旅游外匯收入的絕對差距(除2003年)整體上呈現(xiàn)擴大的趨勢,而六大典型區(qū)區(qū)域內(nèi)旅游外匯收入的相對差距變化并不一致,東部三大區(qū)域內(nèi)旅游外匯收入的相對差異整體上呈下降的趨勢,其中長三角的相對差異程度最小,環(huán)渤海和珠三角的相對差異相對較高。蜀渝旅游區(qū)內(nèi)相對差異波動較大,但變近幾年來相對差異有上升趨勢,云貴旅游區(qū)內(nèi)相對差異波動較小,區(qū)域穩(wěn)定,甘陜旅游區(qū)近幾年有增長趨勢,總體有上升趨勢。 (2)東部旅游帶旅游外匯收入增長速度除個別時段外,均落后于西部旅游帶。東部旅游帶與西部旅游帶旅游外匯收入增長速度的相對差異變化呈下降趨勢。典型區(qū)域旅游外匯收入的增長速度在不斷上升,但區(qū)域間旅游外匯收入增長速度的絕對差距一直在不斷縮小,與此同時,區(qū)域間旅游外匯收入增長速度的相對差距(除2003、2007兩年)也一直比持續(xù)下降。 (3)環(huán)渤海地區(qū)的旅游省際差異波動平緩,但是對六大典型區(qū)的貢獻值偏高,說明環(huán)渤海地區(qū)內(nèi)部的省際差異是造成六大典型區(qū)差異的主要原因。云貴地區(qū)的省際差異貢獻值最小,多年來呈現(xiàn)緩慢的上升趨勢,珠三角地區(qū)的省際差異呈現(xiàn)上升趨勢,說明珠三角地區(qū)近年來入境旅游也的發(fā)展的費均衡性有所加大。長三角地區(qū)的差異則有說下降,說明長三角地區(qū)的入境旅游業(yè)發(fā)展趨于均衡。川渝旅游區(qū)的貢獻值經(jīng)歷了先低后高的變化。甘陜旅游區(qū)的值則是2007年以前一直在增大,2008年出現(xiàn)了極低值。 (4)東部旅游區(qū)中環(huán)渤海的集中程度最低,珠三角最高；西部地區(qū)中是川渝旅游區(qū)的集中程度最低,云貴旅游區(qū)集中程度最高。因此,環(huán)渤海和川渝地區(qū)入境旅游業(yè)的專業(yè)化集中程度還須進一步努力。 本文以國家旅游局歷年統(tǒng)計的入境旅游資料為基礎,并結(jié)合筆者親自參加的旅游市場問卷調(diào)查為輔助參考,在實證案例分析的基礎上,對入境旅游差異的對比研究在以下幾方面進行了創(chuàng)新： (1)目前學術界對于入境旅游差異研究主要集中在省域范圍內(nèi),或者全國范圍內(nèi),對典型旅游區(qū)入境旅游差異的研究較少,本文選取中國六大典型旅游區(qū)作為研究對象,分別從宏觀、中觀和微觀層次進行了入境旅游差異的對比分析,選取發(fā)展水平和發(fā)展速度等經(jīng)濟指標和Theil系數(shù)、區(qū)位熵等差異指標進行了不同尺度的對比研究,為全面科學的揭示中國入境旅游流的東西遞進演化規(guī)律和機理分析做好了鋪墊工作。 (2)注重理論研究與實踐應用相結(jié)合,論文撰寫依據(jù)了作者親自參與的國家自然科學基金項目(編號：40771058)課題組,2008年赴六大典型旅游區(qū)對入境游客實際調(diào)研以及當面訪談,在此基礎上,整理數(shù)據(jù)進行分析研究使得結(jié)論更具有說服力和科學性。 鑒于研究能力有限和資料的限制,在研究區(qū)域上,僅僅針對具有典型代表性的旅游區(qū)差異進行了分析研究,沒有在全國范圍進行差異研究分析,對于全國非典型旅游區(qū)未能進行對比分析,進而得出全國范圍的差異成果,因而有待于進一步去完善。
[Abstract]:Regional difference is a common phenomenon in regional economic development , but as an important component of regional economic development , regional tourism development difference is also objective ubiquitous , its existence and change will have many complex effects on economy , society , environment and so on . At present , most of the researches on regional tourism development focus on the development and management of regional tourism resources , the marketing and exploitation of the market , and the differences of tourism development between the regions are comparatively small , and the research methods are limited to qualitative research or simple descriptive statistics analysis . Based on the study of the evolution mechanism of China ' s typical regional inbound tourism flow in China , the author selects six typical tourist areas in China as the research area , and analyzes the spatial and spatial differences of the inbound tourism development in the six typical areas of China with the combination of theory and demonstration , with a view to finding out the path of the regional tourism development difference and promoting its overall coordination , sustained and healthy development . This paper gives theoretical guidance and scientific basis for the development of tourism in the six typical areas of China . The main contents of this paper are as follows : Firstly , the author introduces the research significance of the difference of inbound tourism and the status quo of regional difference research at home and abroad . Through the comparative analysis of different scales and different indexes of 17 provinces and cities under the six typical tourist areas , the following conclusions are drawn : ( 1 ) The absolute difference of the development level of tourism foreign exchange income between east and west is rapidly expanded , and the relative difference is rising slowly . The relative difference of the tourism foreign exchange income in the six typical areas is relatively high . The relative difference of the tourism foreign exchange earnings in the three major regions is relatively high . ( 2 ) The growth rate of foreign exchange earnings in the eastern tourism zone lags behind the individual period . The relative difference of the growth rate of foreign exchange earnings in the eastern travel zone and the western tourism zone is declining . The absolute difference of the growth rate of foreign exchange earnings in the region has been shrinking continuously . At the same time , the relative difference of the growth rate of foreign exchange earnings between the regions ( except 2003 , 2007 ) has been declining . ( 3 ) The fluctuation of the inter - provincial difference in the Bohai Sea area is gentle , but the contribution value to the six typical areas is high , which indicates that the inter - provincial difference in the Bohai Sea area is the main cause of the difference of the six typical regions . ( 4 ) The concentration of the Bohai Sea is the lowest in the eastern tourist area , the highest in the Pearl River Delta , the lowest in the western region , and the highest concentration in Yungui tourist area . Therefore , the degree of specialization of inbound tourism in the Bohai Sea and Sichuan - Chongqing area must be further efforts . Based on the inbound tourism data collected by the national tourism bureau in the past year and combined with the author ' s own self - participation tourist market questionnaire , this paper makes a comparative study on the difference of inbound tourism on the basis of the empirical case analysis , and makes innovations in the following aspects : ( 1 ) At present , the research on inbound tourism difference is mainly concentrated in the province domain , or in the whole country , the study on the difference of inbound tourism in typical tourist areas is less , and the contrast study of different scales such as the economic indexes such as the development level and the development speed and the difference indexes such as Thom coefficient and location entropy are selected . ( 2 ) Based on the combination of theoretical research and practical application , the paper is based on the research group of the national natural science fund project ( No . 40771,058 ) which the author participated personally . In 2008 , it went to six typical tourist areas to study the inbound tourists and interviews . On the basis of this , the analysis and research on the collated data made the conclusion more persuasive and scientific . In view of the limited research capacity and the limitation of data , only the difference of typical typical tourist areas is analyzed and studied in the study area , and there is no difference research and analysis in the whole country , and the comparative analysis of the national non - representative tourist areas is not conducted , and the nationwide difference results are obtained . Therefore , it is expected to be further improved .

【學位授予單位】：陜西師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：F592

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 高超;陸玉麒;;江蘇省旅游經(jīng)濟空間差異研究[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學;2006年24期

2 王娟;安徽省各市國內(nèi)旅游者空間結(jié)構和地域差異初步研究[J];安徽師范大學學報(自然科學版);2004年02期

3 王良健;鄧瓊芬;;我國旅游業(yè)發(fā)展的區(qū)域差異研究[J];財經(jīng)理論與實踐;2007年01期

4 程海峰;安徽省旅游業(yè)國民經(jīng)濟貢獻率區(qū)域差異分析[J];池州師專學報;2004年05期

5 李小建,喬家君;20世紀90年代中國縣際經(jīng)濟差異的空間分析[J];地理學報;2001年02期

6 陳秀瓊;黃福才;;中國入境旅游的區(qū)域差異特征分析[J];地理學報;2006年12期

7 楊國良;張捷;艾南山;劉波;;旅游流齊夫結(jié)構及空間差異化特征——以四川省為例[J];地理學報;2006年12期

8 保繼剛,龍江智;城市旅游驅(qū)動力的轉(zhuǎn)化及其實踐意義[J];地理研究;2005年02期

9 龐麗;王錚;劉清春;;我國入境旅游和經(jīng)濟增長關系分析[J];地域研究與開發(fā);2006年03期

10 魏后凱,劉楷;我國地區(qū)差異變動趨勢分析與預測[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟研究;1994年03期

相關博士學位論文 前2條

1 劉宏盈;中國長三角入境旅游流西向梯度擴散研究[D];陜西師范大學;2009年

2 張佑印;北京入境集聚擴散旅游流時空演變規(guī)律及動力機制研究[D];陜西師范大學;2010年

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 張京奪;湖南省旅游發(fā)展區(qū)域差異研究[D];湖南師范大學;2008年

2 何麗紅;長江流域旅游發(fā)展績效的地區(qū)差異研究[D];華東師范大學;2008年

3 徐菁;浙江省入境旅游規(guī)模差異研究[D];南京師范大學;2008年

，

本文編號：1539678