【摘要】：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)作為一種特殊的民事權(quán)利,兼有公權(quán)與私權(quán)的屬性。不僅要保護(hù)權(quán)利人的民事權(quán)益,而且還要維護(hù)社會(huì)的公共利益。因此,與其他的民事權(quán)利相比,專利權(quán)的保護(hù)除了采取司法保護(hù)的途徑以外,還可以由管理專利工作的部門通過行政管理的手段進(jìn)行保護(hù)。我國(guó)專利權(quán)實(shí)行的是行政保護(hù)與司法保護(hù)雙軌制模式,是符合我國(guó)社會(huì)主義國(guó)情特色的,同時(shí)也符合有關(guān)國(guó)際公約的規(guī)定。該種模式在維護(hù)我國(guó)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序,制止侵權(quán)行為,保護(hù)專利權(quán)人的合法權(quán)益方面發(fā)揮著重要的作用。一般情況下,行政保護(hù)與司法保護(hù)并沒有沖突可言,但是在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)領(lǐng)域內(nèi),由于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)本身的權(quán)利屬性,特別是相關(guān)權(quán)利的產(chǎn)生來自不同的行政機(jī)關(guān)的授予,對(duì)于同一個(gè)專利侵權(quán)事實(shí),專利權(quán)人可以分別選擇行政保護(hù)或是司法保護(hù)兩個(gè)不同的途徑予以解決,這就使得專利行政保護(hù)與司法保護(hù)之間產(chǎn)生緊密聯(lián)系的同時(shí)又產(chǎn)生了沖突。 隨著越來越多復(fù)雜的專利案件,專利行政保護(hù)與司法保護(hù)雙軌制保護(hù)模式還存在一些需要解決的法律問題。因此,深入分析我國(guó)專利權(quán)行政保護(hù)與司法保護(hù)的不足及之間存在的問題,進(jìn)一步探討如何完善我國(guó)專利雙軌制保護(hù)模式是一個(gè)具有理論研究?jī)r(jià)值和現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)意義的課題。通過對(duì)我國(guó)專利行政保護(hù)與司法保護(hù)的論述,提出了目前我國(guó)專利雙軌制保護(hù)模式的不足主要體現(xiàn)在專利確權(quán)問題、兩者之間的沖突與不協(xié)調(diào)等問題。這些問題一方面造成了有限的行政資源和司法資源的浪費(fèi),另一方面也不利于實(shí)現(xiàn)社會(huì)的公平正義。我們務(wù)必從我國(guó)國(guó)情出發(fā),分析研究現(xiàn)階段專利雙軌制保護(hù)模式的不足,同時(shí)借鑒國(guó)外的專利保護(hù)制度的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn),采取一些具體的措施完善雙軌制保護(hù)模式,如逐步完善相關(guān)立法、建立專利行政保護(hù)與司法保護(hù)機(jī)制的協(xié)調(diào)以及構(gòu)建網(wǎng)上銜接和信息共享平臺(tái)等措施,并在此基礎(chǔ)上實(shí)現(xiàn)專利行政保護(hù)與司法保護(hù)資源的有效整合,實(shí)現(xiàn)更大更優(yōu)的效力。
[Abstract]:As a special civil right, intellectual property has the attributes of public right and private right. Not only to protect the rights of the civil rights and interests, but also to safeguard the public interest. Therefore, compared with other civil rights, the protection of patent rights can be protected by administrative means in addition to judicial protection. The patent right of our country implements the dual track mode of administrative protection and judicial protection, which accords with the characteristics of socialist national conditions of our country, and also accords with the provisions of relevant international conventions. This model plays an important role in maintaining the order of market economy, stopping infringement and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of patentee. In general, there is no conflict between administrative protection and judicial protection, but in the field of intellectual property protection, due to the property of intellectual property itself, especially the emergence of related rights from different administrative organs, For the same patent infringement facts, the patentee can choose two different ways of administrative protection or judicial protection to solve the problem, which makes the patent administrative protection and judicial protection have close connection and conflict. With more and more complex patent cases, there are still some legal problems that need to be solved in the two-track system of patent administrative protection and judicial protection. Therefore, it is a subject of theoretical research value and practical social significance to deeply analyze the shortcomings and problems between the administrative protection of patent rights and judicial protection in China, and to further explore how to perfect the protection mode of the dual track system of patent in our country. Based on the discussion of administrative and judicial protection of patent in China, this paper points out that the shortcomings of the current mode of patent protection in China are mainly reflected in the problem of patent confirmation right, the conflict and incoordination between the two systems, and so on. These problems, on the one hand, lead to the waste of limited administrative and judicial resources, on the other hand, they are not conducive to the realization of social fairness and justice. We must proceed from the national conditions of our country, analyze and study the shortcomings of the current patent dual-track system protection model, at the same time learn from the advanced experience of foreign patent protection system, and take some concrete measures to perfect the dual-track system protection mode. Such measures as perfecting the relevant legislation, establishing the coordination of patent administrative protection and judicial protection mechanism, constructing the online connection and information sharing platform, and realizing the effective integration of patent administrative protection and judicial protection resources on this basis, To achieve greater and better effectiveness.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 任曉玲;;歐盟加強(qiáng)海關(guān)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)——2009年度《歐盟海關(guān)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法報(bào)告》公布[J];中國(guó)發(fā)明與專利;2010年10期

2 陳美章;對(duì)我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)與管理的探討[J];科技與法律;2003年03期

3 劉紅;論行政程序和司法程序的協(xié)調(diào)——以知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突訴訟為視角[J];科技與法律;2004年03期

4 包海波;美國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度的特點(diǎn)及發(fā)展趨勢(shì)[J];科技與經(jīng)濟(jì);2003年06期

5 顧培東;論我國(guó)民事權(quán)利司法保護(hù)的疏失[J];法學(xué)研究;2002年06期

6 胡朝陽;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度運(yùn)行的有效性探析——以創(chuàng)新型國(guó)家建設(shè)為分析視野[J];法學(xué)論壇;2008年02期

7 楊葉璇;臧寶清;;我國(guó)商標(biāo)確權(quán)機(jī)制改革的分析與思考[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 王超;中國(guó)法治進(jìn)程中罪犯知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保障問題研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2010年

2 焦娜;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的行政保護(hù)與司法救濟(jì)[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

3 陳敬;論我國(guó)專利權(quán)雙軌制保護(hù)制度[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

4 李琳;我國(guó)專利權(quán)行政保護(hù)法律問題探究[D];西北大學(xué);2006年

5 唐玉春;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的雙軌制[D];廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2305702