互聯(lián)網(wǎng)活動(dòng)一個(gè)最大的特點(diǎn)是給實(shí)體用戶的監(jiān)管帶來了很大的難度。通過互聯(lián)網(wǎng),數(shù)以千計(jì)的用戶可以和全世界范圍的人進(jìn)行聯(lián)絡(luò),并通過分散的碎片式數(shù)據(jù)創(chuàng)建、修改和傳播內(nèi)容。Internet運(yùn)行的tcp/ip協(xié)議通過承載這些數(shù)據(jù),并不需要使用者提供準(zhǔn)確的身份信息和地理信息,即可操作。自從20世紀(jì)90年代開始,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)開始高速發(fā)展,產(chǎn)生了重要的經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會(huì)效應(yīng),但同時(shí)伴隨著不斷出現(xiàn)的違法活動(dòng)。這些違法活動(dòng)在某種程度上是由于上述所強(qiáng)調(diào)的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的特點(diǎn)（即匿名性、缺乏地點(diǎn)、互聯(lián)網(wǎng)中立）而引起的。以互聯(lián)網(wǎng)為基礎(chǔ)的經(jīng)濟(jì)促進(jìn)了一種新型私營企業(yè)的產(chǎn)生,這些企業(yè)的服務(wù)主要是提供上網(wǎng)或基于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的服務(wù),其服務(wù)覆蓋了所有人類的活動(dòng)。其與傳統(tǒng)方式的不同在于,從互聯(lián)網(wǎng)接入數(shù)據(jù)到數(shù)據(jù)托管,為商業(yè)和社會(huì)活動(dòng)提供一個(gè)數(shù)字空間,包括允許用戶進(jìn)行在線支付,從提供文件共享平臺(tái)到提供城市的數(shù)字地圖。我們稱此類提供線上服務(wù)的企業(yè)為網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供�；ヂ�(lián)網(wǎng)的原始結(jié)構(gòu)通過優(yōu)雅的極簡設(shè)計(jì)會(huì)顯示出某種優(yōu)勢,因?yàn)槠淠涿�、地理位置的模糊性、網(wǎng)絡(luò)中立性,有利于自由和無邊界的網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境。同時(shí),從另一個(gè)角度看,該三個(gè)特性也有其弊端:匿名性給在線交易帶來了不確定性... 

【文章頁數(shù)】：120 頁

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
abstract
摘要
CHAPTER Ⅰ. THE ROLE OF INTERNET INTERMEDIARIES IN INTERNET REGULATION
    1. Why is it so hard to regulate Internet?
    2. Intermediaries and the architecture of Internet
    3. Why and how do Intermediaries gather information?
    4. The relation between intermediary and unlawful conduct online
    5. Types of Liability
CHAPTER Ⅱ. REGULATION OF THE INTERMEDIARY LIABILITY IN THE USA AND IN THE EU
    1. The introduction of the Communication Decency Act and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act: analysis of the provisions
        1.1. The economic context of the introduction of the Communication Decency Act and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act
        1.2. Section 230 (c) of the CDA: the general discipline of Internet Intermediary liability
        1.3. Intermediary liability and copyright: the Safe Harbor and the principle of cooperation between right holders and intermediaries
        1.4 The U.S. system of intermediary liability
    2. The jurisprudential definition of the limits of Intermediary immunity
        2.1 U.S. jurisprudence on Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act
        2.2. The foundation of Section 230 jurisprudence: exceptionality of the cyberspace
        2.3. U.S. jurisprudence on Internet intermediary liability for copyright infringement
        2.4. Evolution of the notice and takedown system: from “artisanal” notices to bots
    3. Intermediaries in the U.S.A. and liability for trademark infringements
    4. The EU discipline of intermediary liability
        4.1. The E-commerce Directive
        4.2. The Cantone Case
CHAPTER Ⅲ. INTERMEDIARY LIABILITY EXCEPTIONS IN CHINA
    1. The Chinese approach to Internet Intermediary liability
        1.1. The structure of Article 36
        1.2. The relation between general monitoring obligations on Internet intermediaries and civil liability
    2. Notice on Takedown procedure and the duty to take effective measures
        2.1 Validity of the notice
        2.2. Necessary measures
    3. Art 36, comma 3. The standard of knowledge
        3.1. Exegesis of the provision
        3.2. Intermediary liability on defamation and slandering
        3.3 Intermediary liability in torts to privacy
        3.4. Intermediary liability for infringements of intellectual property
    4. A systematic overview of the Chinese discipline of Internet intermediary liability
CHAPTER Ⅳ CONFLICTING SYSTEMS AND CONFLICTING JURISDICTIONS
    1. Sovereignty over the cyberspace
        1.1 Cyberspace as an inherently sovereign entity
        1.2. Regulation through code
        1.3 Regulation through intermediaries as a solution to the “problem” of the borderless nature of Internet
    2. The Limits of a policy based on Intermediary immunity
        2.1 Global restrictions affecting free speech
        2.2. Intermediary self-regulation
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY



本文編號(hào)：3674398