我國行政處罰聽證制度研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2019-07-01 17:24
【摘要】:隨著公安部2013《機(jī)動(dòng)車駕駛證申領(lǐng)和使用規(guī)定》的正式實(shí)施,交通處罰越來越受到人們的關(guān)注。在我國,交通處罰作為行政處罰中較為常見的一種,與人們的生活密切相關(guān)。事實(shí)上除了交通處罰之外的其他行政處罰在口常生活中我們也能經(jīng)常見到,甚至能夠親身體會(huì)到。行政處罰作為行政機(jī)關(guān)針對(duì)行政相對(duì)人作出的具體行政行為,對(duì)行政相對(duì)人的合法權(quán)益會(huì)產(chǎn)生一定的影響。如果行政機(jī)關(guān)作出的具體的行政處罰決定侵害了行政相對(duì)人的正當(dāng)權(quán)益,行政相對(duì)人應(yīng)當(dāng)通過何種方式來維護(hù)其權(quán)益就是我們需要考慮的問題,行政復(fù)議、行政訴訟都是行政相對(duì)人能夠采取的維護(hù)自身合法權(quán)益的合法途徑,但是這兩種途徑都存在法定的適用范圍,一旦超出這個(gè)范圍,我們又當(dāng)如何呢?這就是本文探討的問題所在,即通過行政聽證制度來維護(hù)公民的合法權(quán)益。行政聽證制度自1996年被我國《行政處罰法》引入以后獲得一定程度的發(fā)展,但是到目前為止還存在許多的問題,本文從聽證制度的起源談起,通過分析我國聽證制度目前存在的具體問題來尋找能夠完善這一制度的措施,促進(jìn)這一制度發(fā)展,使其在行政處罰領(lǐng)域發(fā)揮更大的作用,以更好地規(guī)范我國行政機(jī)關(guān)行使行政處罰權(quán)。
[Abstract]:With the formal implementation of the 2013 regulations of the Ministry of Public Security on the Application and use of Motor vehicle driving permits, traffic penalties have attracted more and more attention. In our country, traffic punishment, as a more common administrative punishment, is closely related to people's life. In fact, in addition to traffic penalties, we can often see and even experience other administrative penalties in oral life. Administrative punishment, as a specific administrative act made by the administrative organ against the administrative counterpart, will have a certain impact on the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart. If the specific administrative punishment decision made by the administrative organ infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart, the way in which the administrative counterpart should safeguard its rights and interests is the question that we need to consider. Administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation are the legitimate ways that the administrative counterpart can take to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, but both of these ways have legal scope of application, once they are beyond this scope. What are we supposed to do? This is the problem discussed in this paper, that is, through the administrative hearing system to protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens. The administrative hearing system has been developed to a certain extent since it was introduced into the Administrative punishment Law of our country in 1996, but up to now, there are still many problems. Starting from the origin of the hearing system, this paper analyzes the specific problems existing in the hearing system in our country to find out the measures that can perfect this system, promote the development of this system, and make it play a greater role in the field of administrative punishment. In order to better regulate the exercise of administrative punishment power by the administrative organs of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:D922.11
本文編號(hào):2508666
[Abstract]:With the formal implementation of the 2013 regulations of the Ministry of Public Security on the Application and use of Motor vehicle driving permits, traffic penalties have attracted more and more attention. In our country, traffic punishment, as a more common administrative punishment, is closely related to people's life. In fact, in addition to traffic penalties, we can often see and even experience other administrative penalties in oral life. Administrative punishment, as a specific administrative act made by the administrative organ against the administrative counterpart, will have a certain impact on the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart. If the specific administrative punishment decision made by the administrative organ infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart, the way in which the administrative counterpart should safeguard its rights and interests is the question that we need to consider. Administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation are the legitimate ways that the administrative counterpart can take to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, but both of these ways have legal scope of application, once they are beyond this scope. What are we supposed to do? This is the problem discussed in this paper, that is, through the administrative hearing system to protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens. The administrative hearing system has been developed to a certain extent since it was introduced into the Administrative punishment Law of our country in 1996, but up to now, there are still many problems. Starting from the origin of the hearing system, this paper analyzes the specific problems existing in the hearing system in our country to find out the measures that can perfect this system, promote the development of this system, and make it play a greater role in the field of administrative punishment. In order to better regulate the exercise of administrative punishment power by the administrative organs of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:D922.11
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 李金忠;試談我國行政聽證制度的缺陷及完善途徑[J];陜西教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期
,本文編號(hào):2508666
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2508666.html
最近更新
教材專著