【摘要】：在當前的行政法領域中，行政法治化越來越成為當前世界行政發(fā)展的總體趨向，這一方面是由于人們權利意識的增長導致政府人治因素弊端的暴露,而逐漸取代之于法治文明的到來，私權文化向公權領域的擴張，也越來越促使政府行政過程中的透明化，軟行政的發(fā)展，催生著更多的行政領域由原來需要強制措施才能達到目的的行政方式逐漸向著和諧的方向發(fā)展。如此，政府與民眾之間的關系也逐漸地由管理與服從的關系慢慢地向合作的方向轉(zhuǎn)化，這種需要越來越緩和的行政方式的發(fā)展也越來越多地滲透著契約的精神。契約精神在行政法領域的滲透與擴張是社會文明發(fā)展的必然，其對減輕由于社會發(fā)展給經(jīng)政府帶來行政負擔的同時，也促進了社會高素質(zhì)資源的有效利用。但這種契約精神在行政法領域的擴張不是無限的，它有一個限度，這種限度就是傳統(tǒng)行政法領域。 當前世界行政法的發(fā)展已進入法治行政、服務行政、合作行政以至全球行政，但這并不意味著以強權命令為主要方式的傳統(tǒng)行政管理行政已經(jīng)過時，在目前以至將來很長一段時間內(nèi)，以許可、制裁、處罰、強制為支撐的傳統(tǒng)行政行為方式將會一直穩(wěn)定性地存在，因為人們的自覺意識、法治觀念在短時間內(nèi)并不會得到空前的提高到不需要政府強制制裁而能夠自我約束的程度，這個國家維護正常社會秩序所需要的強制力后盾在短時期內(nèi)還不會改變，所以社會的發(fā)展所促生的新的行政行為方式并不是說傳統(tǒng)行政法已經(jīng)過時，，相反，傳統(tǒng)強制政府與新時期的合作行政將共同促進國家的行政秩序。契約理念在行政法領域的擴張只是在隨著當今世界行政法治化的進程促催著政府行政越來越向著透明化、緩和化的方向發(fā)展而出現(xiàn)并越來越廣泛的軟行政法領域的擴張，由于行政權的強權本質(zhì)不可能允許其侵犯到傳統(tǒng)行政管理領域而破壞行政權威而可能威脅到社會的穩(wěn)定性。筆者就是想通過探討契約精神在行政法領域的擴張明確契約精神在減輕政府行政負擔的同時推動社會的多元性快速發(fā)展，但這種契約精神在行政法領域的擴張并不是無限的，在行政法中不可能是完全替代所有行政行為，只是對傳統(tǒng)行政法強權領域的補充。它的擴張只是在隨著社會的發(fā)展而新增加的行政管理領域，這部分管理較為緩和，只要能夠正確引導就完全可以協(xié)商賦權達到自我管理而減輕政府的管理負擔，或者是政府一時性的較為專業(yè)的工作需要而又沒有必要增設某個行政崗位時而能過契約臨時聘用一些專業(yè)社會機構(gòu)或人員來完成本由政府工作部門來完成的工作，這樣既減輕了政府負擔又節(jié)約了社會資源。由此，契約精神隨著人們法治意識的提高和行政法治化的進程而不斷地向行政法領域滲透和擴張，但這種擴張只是在隨著社會的發(fā)展而新增加的行政法領域，它不可能侵犯到代表強權本質(zhì)而作為維護社會秩序最強有力后盾的傳統(tǒng)行政法領域。
[Abstract]:In the current administrative law field, the administrative law is more and more becoming the general trend of the current world's administrative development, on the one hand, because the increase of people's rights consciousness leads to the exposure of the malpractice of the government's people, and gradually to the arrival of the rule of law civilization. The expansion of the government's culture to the realm of public power has also made it more and more important to promote the transparency and the development of the soft administration in the administrative process of the government. In this way, the relationship between the government and the people is gradually transformed from the relationship of management and obedience to the direction of cooperation, and the development of the more and more moderate administrative way is more and more permeable to the spirit of the contract. The infiltration and expansion of the contract spirit in the field of administrative law is the necessity of the development of the social civilization, and it also promotes the effective utilization of the high-quality resources of the society while the administrative burden is brought to the government through the development of the society. But this kind of contract spirit is not unlimited in the field of administrative law, it has a limit, this limit is the traditional administrative law field. The development of the current world administrative law has entered the administration of the rule of law, the service administration, the cooperation administration and the global administration, but this does not mean that the traditional administration and administration, which takes the power order as the main mode, is out of date, The traditional mode of administrative act, which is cut, punished and forced to support, will always exist, because of the self-consciousness of the people, the concept of the rule of law will not be improved in a short period of time, and the course of self-restraint can be self-imposed without the need of the government to impose the sanction. The new administrative act of the development of the society is not to say that the traditional administrative law is out of date, the phase is not to say that the traditional administrative law is out of date, On the contrary, the traditional compulsory government and the cooperation administration in the new period will jointly promote the state's administrative rank The expansion of the concept of contract in the field of administrative law is only in the field of soft administrative law that has emerged and is becoming more and more extensive with the development of the administrative law of the world and the development of the government's administration in the direction of transparency and moderating. Zhang, because the power of the executive power can not be allowed to violate the administrative authority in the traditional administration of administration, and may threaten the stability of the society The author is to explore the expansion of the contract spirit in the field of administrative law, and to promote the rapid development of the social diversity while reducing the administrative burden of the government, but the expansion of the contract spirit in the field of administrative law is not unlimited. In the administrative law, it is impossible to completely replace all administrative acts, but it is only a complement to the traditional power of the traditional administrative law. The expansion of the government is only in the new administrative area with the development of the society, this part of the management is relatively mild, so long as the right guidance is able to negotiate and empower to achieve self-management, the management of the government is reduced It has not only reduced the burden of the government but also saved the social capital, it was not necessary to add a certain administrative post, but it was not necessary to add an administrative post, and it was not necessary to add a certain administrative post. As a result, the spirit of the contract is constantly permeating and expanding in the field of administrative law with the improvement of the consciousness of the rule of law and the process of administrative law, but the expansion is only the new administrative law collar which is newly added with the development of the society The domain, it can't encroach on the traditional administrative law collar that represents the essence of the power and is the most powerful backing of the maintenance of the social orde
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 陳永章;;行政契約的基本理念及其價值選擇[J];重慶科技學院學報(社會科學版);2008年01期

2 楊解君;;行政法的義務、責任之理念與制度創(chuàng)新——契約理念的融入[J];法商研究;2006年03期

3 楊解君;契約文化的變遷及其啟示(上)——契約理念在公法中的確立[J];法學評論;2004年06期

4 楊解君;行政法平等理念之塑造[J];法學;2004年07期

5 余凌云;依法行政理念在行政契約中的貫徹[J];公安大學學報;1998年01期

6 江必新;鄭禮華;;全面深化改革與法治政府建設的完善[J];法學雜志;2014年01期

7 楊解君,顧冶青;行政契約的訴訟制度架構(gòu)探微[J];江蘇社會科學;2003年06期

8 張子成;行政法上私權的梳理[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學院學報;2005年05期

9 張弘;劉佳;;行政法契約意義解讀[J];遼寧大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2009年04期

10 施建輝;;試論行政契約中行政主體的意思表示[J];南京大學學報(哲學.人文科學.社會科學版);2006年04期

本文編號：2502767