【摘要】：面對日漸繁榮的物質(zhì)文化生活,汽車擁堵問題已經(jīng)成為當(dāng)下生活中的棘手問題。本文認(rèn)為,機(jī)動車“尾號限行”這一措施的行使,使行政權(quán)對公民私權(quán)造成了一定侵害,然而作為短期內(nèi)對緩解交通壓力行之有效的行政手段,如何能通過行政法的角度對其加以完善,減少其爭議增加其效用則是本文的研究重點。 本文首先對機(jī)動車“尾號限行”進(jìn)行了綜合概述,簡單介紹了機(jī)動車“尾號限行”的相關(guān)概念、特征、法律性質(zhì),及其理論基礎(chǔ)等基本知識；其次,本文通過從宏觀上對機(jī)動車“尾號限行”的背景與現(xiàn)狀加以描述,為下一章機(jī)動車“尾號限行”的法理分析埋下伏筆；第三章則從合法性、合理性、程序正當(dāng)性三個角度深入研究,探究該措施的法理依據(jù)是否充分；第四章,通過完善相關(guān)的法律法規(guī)使其進(jìn)一步合法化,構(gòu)建利益補(bǔ)償機(jī)制使其更加合理,健全正當(dāng)法律程序使其更趨向于公平、公正。從而,使機(jī)動車“尾號限行”這一措施的爭議減少,能被更多的民眾所理解,更有效地緩解行人、道路、機(jī)動車之間的矛盾,促進(jìn)社會和諧。
[Abstract]:In the face of the increasingly prosperous material and cultural life, the problem of car congestion has become a thorny problem in current life. This paper holds that the exercise of the measure of "tail number restriction" of motor vehicle causes certain infringement of administrative power to citizens' private rights, however, it is an effective administrative means to alleviate traffic pressure in the short term. How to perfect it through the angle of administrative law and reduce its controversy and increase its utility is the focus of this paper. At first, this paper gives a comprehensive overview of the "tail number limit" of motor vehicle, and introduces the basic knowledge of the vehicle "tail number limit", such as the concept, characteristics, legal nature, and theoretical basis of the vehicle's "tail number limit". Secondly, this paper describes the background and current situation of the "tail number limit" of motor vehicle from the macro perspective, and lays the groundwork for the next chapter of the legal theory analysis of the "tail number limit" of motor vehicle. The third chapter is from the legitimacy, rationality, procedural legitimacy of three in-depth research, to explore the legal basis of the measure is adequate; The fourth chapter, by perfecting the relevant laws and regulations to further legalize it, construct the benefit compensation mechanism to make it more reasonable, and perfect the due process of law to make it more fair and just. As a result, the dispute on the measure of "tail limit" of motor vehicle can be reduced, which can be understood by more people, alleviate the contradiction among pedestrians, roads and motor vehicles more effectively, and promote social harmony.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長春理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.14

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙先立;;緩解大型城市交通擁堵的國際經(jīng)驗和我國的解決對策[J];城市觀察;2012年03期

2 胡建淼;張效羽;;有關(guān)對物權(quán)行政限制的幾個法律問題——以全國部分城市小車尾號限行為例[J];法學(xué);2011年11期

3 劉偉;;行政法視野下行政決策的正當(dāng)性分析——以北京、杭州、成都三地汽車限行為例[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年02期

4 鄭新駿;;價格聽證中的公眾參與[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年02期

5 俞佳飛;;從機(jī)動車限行實踐看效果和風(fēng)險[J];交通與運(yùn)輸(學(xué)術(shù)版);2011年01期

6 劉小明;;北京市低碳交通體系發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略[J];建設(shè)科技;2010年17期

7 張魯萍;;試論行政強(qiáng)制的有效實施——以《行政強(qiáng)制法》的反思為視角[J];江漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年04期

8 張微林;;風(fēng)險治理過程中的法律規(guī)制模式轉(zhuǎn)型[J];科技與法律;2012年06期

9 楊治坤;;部門行政職權(quán)相對集中的憲政基礎(chǔ)[J];廣西社會科學(xué);2013年04期

10 陳永強(qiáng);;社會公共利益原則的合同法適用[J];杭州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2013年03期

，

本文編號：2411486