【摘要】：行政合同大量存在于行政管理實(shí)務(wù)中已是不爭(zhēng)的客觀事實(shí),行政合同糾紛因行政合同數(shù)量的增加而增多,如何高效順利的解決行政合同糾紛一直是備受關(guān)注的課題。我國(guó)立法已把行政合同歸入行政訴訟的受案范圍,司法程序是不可缺少的救濟(jì)渠道,對(duì)行政合同進(jìn)行司法審查十分必要�？偨Y(jié)我國(guó)行政合同司法審查中存在的一些問題,比如訴訟模式混亂、審查原則不一、審查模式模糊,這極不利于行政合同糾紛的解決。有些國(guó)家的行政合同制度已逐漸成熟,在行政合同司法審查方面給了我國(guó)很多啟示。因此,借鑒國(guó)外行政合同司法審查制度,根據(jù)我國(guó)國(guó)情,針對(duì)我國(guó)行政合同司法審查中出現(xiàn)的問題,提出以下完善措施:首先,統(tǒng)一行政合同的行政訴訟模式;其次,概括司法審查原則,根據(jù)行政規(guī)范和民事規(guī)范總結(jié)出合法、合理、合約原則;最后,以原告訴訟請(qǐng)求為出發(fā)點(diǎn)和落腳點(diǎn),重點(diǎn)審查行政優(yōu)益權(quán),對(duì)行政合同進(jìn)行全面審查,妥善解決行政合同糾紛,平衡雙方利益,發(fā)揮行政合同的功能。
[Abstract]:It is an indisputable objective fact that a large number of administrative contracts exist in the practice of administrative management. The number of administrative contract disputes increases with the increase of the number of administrative contracts. How to solve administrative contract disputes efficiently and smoothly has been a subject of great concern. The legislation of our country has classified the administrative contract into the scope of accepting the case in the administrative litigation, the judicial procedure is an indispensable relief channel, it is very necessary to carry on the judicial review to the administrative contract. This paper summarizes some problems existing in judicial review of administrative contract in our country, such as confusion of litigation mode, different principles of examination and vague examination mode, which is extremely unfavorable to the settlement of disputes in administrative contract. In some countries, the system of administrative contract has matured gradually, which gives us a lot of enlightenment in judicial review of administrative contract. Therefore, draw lessons from the foreign administrative contract judicial review system, according to the situation of our country, in view of the problems in the judicial review of our administrative contract, put forward the following measures: first, unify the administrative contract administrative litigation mode; secondly, Summarize the principle of judicial review, sum up the principle of legality, reasonableness and contract according to the administrative norm and civil norm; finally, take the plaintiff's lawsuit request as the starting point and the foothold, focus on the examination of the administrative superior interest right, carry on the comprehensive examination to the administrative contract, Properly resolve disputes in administrative contracts, balance the interests of both parties, and give full play to the functions of administrative contracts.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺(tái)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曾哲;韓錦霞;;我國(guó)行政合同司法審查的實(shí)踐梳理及完善路徑[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2016年06期

2 高俊杰;;新《行政訴訟法》下的行政合同訴訟[J];財(cái)經(jīng)法學(xué);2016年02期

3 李廣宇;;審理行政協(xié)議案件對(duì)民事法律規(guī)范的適用[J];中國(guó)法律評(píng)論;2016年01期

4 滿先進(jìn);;論我國(guó)行政合同司法救濟(jì)制度的不足及完善[J];西華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年06期

5 夏文菊;;論我國(guó)行政合同訴訟制度的完善——以新修改的《行政訴訟法》為視角[J];內(nèi)江師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年09期

6 李福忠;;新行政訴訟法確立的行政協(xié)議訴訟制度初探[J];山東審判;2015年04期

7 梁鳳云;;行政協(xié)議案件的審理和判決規(guī)則[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年04期

8 鄭春燕;;大陸行政合同的審查現(xiàn)狀與困境[J];浙江社會(huì)科學(xué);2014年11期

9 王旭軍;;論行政合同案件的類型化[J];人民司法;2014年11期

10 楊解君;陳詠梅;;中國(guó)大陸行政合同的糾紛解決:現(xiàn)狀、問題與路徑選擇[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2014年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2278692