論交通事故認(rèn)定書的性質(zhì)及可訴性研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-15 08:48
【摘要】：在我國的司法審判案件當(dāng)中，民事案件一直占據(jù)大部分的比例。而在民事案件中，又以離婚案件、勞動爭議案件、交通事故及工傷索賠案件等占據(jù)著半壁江山。許多法院為了應(yīng)對大量的同類案件，分離出了專門的審判庭來負(fù)責(zé)審理某一類案件�？梢钥闯觯覈痉ㄟM(jìn)程正逐步向著法治化、專業(yè)化的方向發(fā)展。但是在司法審判越來越專業(yè)化的今天，仍然存在著一些立法的漏洞或者是不合理的部分亟待解決。本文主要探討的就是在審理交通事故類案件所遇到的一些困惑以及理論與實(shí)際的不統(tǒng)一。 交通事故一旦發(fā)生，當(dāng)事人的人身和財(cái)產(chǎn)受到損害，嚴(yán)重時(shí)還會面臨著陰陽相隔的悲痛局面。我國對于交通安全問題一直尤為關(guān)注。一方面，要預(yù)防此類事故的發(fā)生，加強(qiáng)對駕駛?cè)藛T的監(jiān)督。另一方面，一旦發(fā)生事故，要最大限度的確保當(dāng)事人挽回?fù)p失，讓肇事者受到相應(yīng)的法律制裁。近年來，各項(xiàng)法律的出臺都嚴(yán)格規(guī)范了交通安全問題。以上措施確實(shí)起到了一定的效果，但是對于交通事故中的一個(gè)重要環(huán)節(jié)即交通事故認(rèn)定書卻長期為人們忽視，法律規(guī)定上也存在不完備的地方。 文章主要分為五個(gè)部分。第一部分與第二部分介紹了事故認(rèn)定書的定義與作用以及歷史的沿革。要想對事故認(rèn)定書有一個(gè)準(zhǔn)確全面的了解首先就要明確其基本含義，全面了解在不同時(shí)期不同背景下的發(fā)展變化。第三部分討論了交通事故認(rèn)定書的性質(zhì)問題。這一問題在理論上一致存在較大的爭議，通過比較不同學(xué)說的觀點(diǎn)，，最后得出交通事故認(rèn)定書屬于具體行政行為的結(jié)論。第四部分則主要討論交通事故認(rèn)定書提起行政訴訟的必要性與可行性。不論是從權(quán)利救濟(jì)的角度還是權(quán)利監(jiān)督的角度，都應(yīng)將事故認(rèn)定書納入行政訴訟的受案范圍。文章最后一個(gè)部分對完善該制度提出了一些建議和設(shè)想。主要從復(fù)議制度、訴訟制度和賠償制度三個(gè)方面完善其救濟(jì)途徑。因而，最后得出結(jié)論即交通事故認(rèn)定書應(yīng)屬于一種具體行政行為，且是具體行政行為中的行政確認(rèn)行為，同時(shí)也應(yīng)具有可訴訟。
[Abstract]:In our country judicial cases, civil cases have occupied most of the proportion. In civil cases, divorce cases, labor disputes cases, traffic accidents and industrial injury cases occupy half. In order to deal with a large number of similar cases, many courts have separated out specialized divisions to deal with certain types of cases. It can be seen that the judicial process of our country is gradually developing towards the rule of law and specialization. However, there are still some legislative loopholes or unreasonable parts to be solved. This paper mainly discusses some puzzles and disunity between theory and practice in handling traffic accident cases. Once a traffic accident occurs, the person and property of the party concerned are damaged, and when it is serious, it will also face the sad situation of the separation of yin and yang. Our country has been paying special attention to the traffic safety problem. On the one hand, to prevent the occurrence of such accidents, strengthen the supervision of drivers. On the other hand, in the event of an accident, to ensure that the parties to recover the loss, so that the perpetrators of the corresponding legal sanctions. In recent years, the promulgation of various laws have strictly regulated traffic safety issues. The above measures have played a certain effect, but for an important link in the traffic accident, the traffic accident identification document has been ignored for a long time, and the legal provisions are not complete. The article is divided into five parts. The first part and the second part introduce the definition and function of the accident certificate and the history. In order to have an accurate and comprehensive understanding of the accident determination document, we must first make clear its basic meaning and fully understand the development and changes in different periods and different backgrounds. The third part discusses the nature of traffic accident identification document. There is a great dispute on this problem in theory. By comparing different theories, the conclusion that the traffic accident cognizance is a concrete administrative act is concluded. The fourth part mainly discusses the necessity and feasibility of administrative litigation. Whether from the angle of right relief or right supervision, the accident cognizance should be brought into the scope of administrative litigation. The last part of the article puts forward some suggestions and ideas to perfect the system. Mainly from the reconsideration system, litigation system and compensation system three aspects to improve its relief approach. Therefore, it is concluded that the traffic accident identification document should be a specific administrative act, and should be an administrative confirmation act in the specific administrative act, and should also be actionable.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川省社會科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.14;D925.3
本文編號：2272004
[Abstract]:In our country judicial cases, civil cases have occupied most of the proportion. In civil cases, divorce cases, labor disputes cases, traffic accidents and industrial injury cases occupy half. In order to deal with a large number of similar cases, many courts have separated out specialized divisions to deal with certain types of cases. It can be seen that the judicial process of our country is gradually developing towards the rule of law and specialization. However, there are still some legislative loopholes or unreasonable parts to be solved. This paper mainly discusses some puzzles and disunity between theory and practice in handling traffic accident cases. Once a traffic accident occurs, the person and property of the party concerned are damaged, and when it is serious, it will also face the sad situation of the separation of yin and yang. Our country has been paying special attention to the traffic safety problem. On the one hand, to prevent the occurrence of such accidents, strengthen the supervision of drivers. On the other hand, in the event of an accident, to ensure that the parties to recover the loss, so that the perpetrators of the corresponding legal sanctions. In recent years, the promulgation of various laws have strictly regulated traffic safety issues. The above measures have played a certain effect, but for an important link in the traffic accident, the traffic accident identification document has been ignored for a long time, and the legal provisions are not complete. The article is divided into five parts. The first part and the second part introduce the definition and function of the accident certificate and the history. In order to have an accurate and comprehensive understanding of the accident determination document, we must first make clear its basic meaning and fully understand the development and changes in different periods and different backgrounds. The third part discusses the nature of traffic accident identification document. There is a great dispute on this problem in theory. By comparing different theories, the conclusion that the traffic accident cognizance is a concrete administrative act is concluded. The fourth part mainly discusses the necessity and feasibility of administrative litigation. Whether from the angle of right relief or right supervision, the accident cognizance should be brought into the scope of administrative litigation. The last part of the article puts forward some suggestions and ideas to perfect the system. Mainly from the reconsideration system, litigation system and compensation system three aspects to improve its relief approach. Therefore, it is concluded that the traffic accident identification document should be a specific administrative act, and should be an administrative confirmation act in the specific administrative act, and should also be actionable.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川省社會科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.14;D925.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 管滿泉;;論交通事故認(rèn)定書的證據(jù)屬性[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2008年06期
2 胡勝;;交通事故認(rèn)定的法律性質(zhì)辨析[J];湖南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期
3 趙信會;;對交通事故認(rèn)定書證據(jù)屬性的質(zhì)疑[J];法學(xué)論壇;2009年06期
4 李菊萍;;道路交通事故認(rèn)定機(jī)制的完善[J];長安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2009年03期
本文編號：2272004
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2272004.html
最近更新
教材專著
