【摘要】：信息公開是法治公安建設(shè)的必然要求,公安機(jī)關(guān)哪些信息屬于政府信息并可以為公眾所知悉,是推進(jìn)信息公開工作的前提性、基礎(chǔ)性問題。公安機(jī)關(guān)信息具有信息量大、關(guān)注度高、保密信息多、個(gè)案信息公開需要具體分析等特點(diǎn)。真正意義上的公安機(jī)關(guān)信息公開發(fā)源于上世紀(jì)八十年代,并隨著《政府信息公開條例》的實(shí)施和《公安機(jī)關(guān)執(zhí)法公開規(guī)定》的出臺(tái),公開范圍不斷拓展。通過對(duì)各地信息公開總體情況和信息公開訴訟實(shí)踐狀況進(jìn)行考察,發(fā)現(xiàn)公安機(jī)關(guān)信息公開范圍界定存在政府信息與否的認(rèn)定難,法定不予公開事項(xiàng)把握不準(zhǔn)、主動(dòng)公開內(nèi)容隨意性大、熱點(diǎn)事件公開不及時(shí)全面、非正常申請應(yīng)對(duì)乏力等問題。存在問題的主要原因有政府信息的概念易引發(fā)分歧、不公開事項(xiàng)邊界不清、相關(guān)法律規(guī)定存在沖突、公安機(jī)關(guān)執(zhí)法不規(guī)范、信息公開理論研究不深入等。結(jié)合域外信息公開的經(jīng)驗(yàn)及啟示,建議在立法層面,將刑事執(zhí)法信息統(tǒng)一納入《條例》調(diào)整范圍,在明確“公開為原則,不公開為例外”的前提下,全面列舉不予公開的事項(xiàng),依法規(guī)制濫用信息公開申請權(quán)的行為;在實(shí)踐層面,公安機(jī)關(guān)應(yīng)當(dāng)完善信息公開內(nèi)容和方式,將信息公開融入公安執(zhí)法規(guī)范化建設(shè),做到公開與規(guī)范相互促進(jìn),不斷推動(dòng)警務(wù)數(shù)據(jù)開放。
[Abstract]:Information publicity is an inevitable requirement of the construction of public security under the rule of law. Which information of public security organs belongs to the government information and can be known by the public is the prerequisite and basic problem in the work of promoting information disclosure. The information of public security organs has the characteristics of large amount of information, high degree of attention, more confidential information, and the case information disclosure needs specific analysis and so on. The public information of public security organs originated in the eighties of the last century, and with the implementation of the "regulations on the publicity of Government Information" and the publication of the "provisions on the publicity of Law Enforcement by Public Security organs", the scope of publicity has been continuously expanded. Through the investigation of the general situation of information disclosure and the practice of information disclosure litigation in various places, it is found that it is difficult to determine whether the scope of information disclosure of public security organs exists in the determination of government information or not, and that the legal non-disclosure matters are uncertain. The content of active disclosure is arbitrary, the hot issues are not timely and comprehensive, and the abnormal application is weak. The main reasons for the problems are that the concept of government information is liable to lead to disagreement, the boundary of non-disclosure matters is unclear, the relevant laws and regulations are in conflict, the law enforcement of public security organs is not standardized, and the theory of information disclosure is not deeply studied. Combined with the experience and enlightenment of information disclosure outside the country, it is suggested that the criminal law enforcement information should be brought into the regulation scope of the regulations in the legislative level, and on the premise of "openness as the principle and not open as the exception", the items that should not be disclosed should be listed in an all-round way. In practice, the public security organs should perfect the contents and methods of information disclosure, integrate the information publicity into the standardization construction of public security law enforcement, and achieve mutual promotion between openness and standardization. To continuously promote the opening up of police data.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊偉東;;政府信息公開申請人資格及其對(duì)行政訴訟原告資格的發(fā)展——以中華環(huán)保聯(lián)合會(huì)訴修文縣環(huán)保局案為分析基點(diǎn)[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2017年01期

2 王萬華;;開放政府與修改《政府信息公開條例》的內(nèi)容定位[J];北方法學(xué);2016年06期

3 周漢華;;誤讀與被誤讀——從公安機(jī)關(guān)刑事執(zhí)法信息公開看《政府信息公開條例》修改[J];北方法學(xué);2016年06期

4 高一飛;;警務(wù)公開的現(xiàn)狀評(píng)估與完善建議[J];貴州民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年05期

5 后向東;;美國2016年《信息自由法》改革法案述評(píng)[J];電子政務(wù);2016年10期

6 高鴻;;濫訴之殤引發(fā)的再思考[J];中國法律評(píng)論;2016年04期

7 耿寶建;周覓;;政府信息公開領(lǐng)域起訴權(quán)的濫用和限制——兼談陸紅霞訴南通市發(fā)改委政府信息公開案的價(jià)值[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2016年03期

8 梁藝;;“濫訴”之辯:信息公開的制度異化及其矯正[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年01期

9 孟鴻志;張_g;;政府信息公開主體的重構(gòu)——以“三張清單”制度為路徑[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2016年01期

10 肖衛(wèi)兵;;咨詢類政府信息公開申請?zhí)轿鯷J];法學(xué)論壇;2015年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2269927