發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-14 20:34

【摘要】：理論界對《道路交通安全法》有很多的爭議，這些爭議的目的都是期望該法可以在更佳的程度上得以實(shí)施，更好地服務(wù)于社會(huì)，爭論的焦點(diǎn)主要是集中于第76條。比如大量的學(xué)者認(rèn)為司機(jī)與行人發(fā)生交通事故時(shí)，對其雙方進(jìn)行責(zé)任配置的歸責(zé)原則的定性不同的觀點(diǎn)；另外還有的學(xué)者對現(xiàn)行法是否給司機(jī)和行人提供最優(yōu)的激勵(lì)進(jìn)行了研究。關(guān)于第76條的爭論還有很多。筆者在本文僅從兩個(gè)角度進(jìn)行分析，即司機(jī)與行人之間責(zé)任配置的性質(zhì)定性，以及在定性基礎(chǔ)上對司機(jī)與行人之間責(zé)任配置的激勵(lì)狀況進(jìn)行法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的分析，老題新做，發(fā)現(xiàn)不足并提出自己的見解。 本文首先對司機(jī)與行人責(zé)任配置定性，從資料梳理中發(fā)現(xiàn)現(xiàn)行定性中存在的問題，對這些問題進(jìn)行分析后，筆者提出自己的觀點(diǎn)，，認(rèn)為司機(jī)與行人之間交通事故責(zé)任配置性質(zhì)應(yīng)當(dāng)定性為過錯(cuò)責(zé)任與補(bǔ)償責(zé)任的綜合體；緊接著在定性的基礎(chǔ)上，筆者通過法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)中常用的博弈矩陣分析的方法，通過成本-收益分析對現(xiàn)行法下司機(jī)與行人之間的激勵(lì)情況進(jìn)行分析，在更為直觀的層面提出，司機(jī)方的責(zé)任配置份額應(yīng)當(dāng)細(xì)化，并且不應(yīng)當(dāng)過分傾斜地保護(hù)行人一方。賦予司機(jī)方過重的注意義務(wù)會(huì)使其預(yù)防投入過高，其將沒有激勵(lì)去保持適度預(yù)防，無助于交通事故減少。《道路交通安全法》的立法目的是保護(hù)交通安全，維護(hù)交通秩序，降低交通事故的發(fā)生概率，宗旨在于“以人為本”，要真正做到如此，從法律層面至少要保證相關(guān)法律法規(guī)的盡量完善，更好為實(shí)踐服務(wù)。
[Abstract]:There are many controversies about the Road Traffic Safety Law in the theoretical circle. The purpose of these controversies is to hope that the law can be implemented to a better extent and serve the society better. The focus of the controversy is mainly on Article 76. For example, a large number of scholars think that drivers and pedestrians in traffic accidents, the allocation of responsibility for both sides of the principle of liability qualitative differences; Other scholars have studied whether the current law provides optimal incentives for drivers and pedestrians. There is still much debate about article 76. In this paper, the author only analyzes from two angles, that is, the nature and nature of responsibility allocation between drivers and pedestrians, and the incentive status of responsibility allocation between drivers and pedestrians on the basis of qualitative analysis. Find out what's wrong and put forward your own ideas. In this paper, first of all, the qualitative analysis of driver and pedestrian responsibility allocation, from the data combing found the existing problems in the qualitative analysis of these problems, the author put forward his own point of view, The author thinks that the nature of traffic accident liability allocation between drivers and pedestrians should be defined as the combination of fault liability and compensation liability, and then, on the basis of qualitative analysis, the author adopts the method of game matrix analysis, which is commonly used in law and economics. Through cost-benefit analysis, the paper analyzes the incentive situation between driver and pedestrian under the current law, and puts forward that the allocation share of driver's responsibility should be refined, and the pedestrian should not be too inclined to protect the pedestrian. Giving drivers too much duty of care will lead to excessive investment in prevention, and it will have no incentive to maintain proper prevention, which will not help reduce traffic accidents. The legislative purpose of the Road Traffic Safety Law is to protect traffic safety and maintain traffic order. To reduce the probability of traffic accidents, the aim is "people-oriented", to really do so, from the legal level at least to ensure that the relevant laws and regulations as far as possible to better serve the practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.14

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃龍;;民事補(bǔ)償責(zé)任研究[J];廈門大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2004年02期

2 段蕾蕾;吳春眉;鄧曉;蔣煒;王建生;;2006-2008年中國道路交通傷害狀況分析[J];公共衛(wèi)生與預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué);2010年03期

3 林建偉;論交通事故的歸責(zé)原則[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2005年06期

4 謝薇;韓文;;對《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》上機(jī)動(dòng)車交通事故責(zé)任主體的解讀——以與《道路交通安全法》第76條責(zé)任主體的對接為中心[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2010年06期

5 楊立新;;我國道路交通事故責(zé)任歸責(zé)原則研究[J];法學(xué);2008年10期

6 李敏;;論機(jī)動(dòng)車交通事故責(zé)任的歸責(zé)原則與責(zé)任的承擔(dān)[J];寧夏大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年03期

7 張新寶;;道路交通事故責(zé)任歸責(zé)原則的演進(jìn)與《道路交通安全法》第76條[J];法學(xué)論壇;2006年02期

8 朱崇實(shí),陳丕,楊曉莉,林文琴,袁敏;《道路交通安全法》第76條之法律經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[J];廈門大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年05期

9 王成;;關(guān)于道路交通事故侵權(quán)行為歸責(zé)原則變遷的考察——以吳軍發(fā)等訴劉寰道路交通事故人身損害賠償糾紛案為背景[J];政治與法律;2008年07期

10 劉家安;;機(jī)動(dòng)車交通事故責(zé)任的歸責(zé)原則及責(zé)任歸屬[J];政治與法律;2010年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 楊靜毅;醫(yī)療侵權(quán)的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

本文編號(hào)：2184044